Comparative safety and tolerability of duloxetine vs. pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and tolerability of three treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were compared. METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, open-label study confirming the non-inferiority of duloxetine (N = 138) vs. pregabalin (N = 134) and the combination of duloxetine plus gabapentin (N = 135) as the primary outcome was previously published. Patients had an inadequate pain response to a stable dose of gabapentin (≥ 900 mg/day) for ≥ 5 weeks prior to study enrolment. Data from that study were assessed in this current analysis for a detailed report of safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Completion rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Discontinuation because of adverse events was significantly greater in the duloxetine (19.6%) vs. pregabalin group (10.4%; p = 0.04); no differences emerged between the duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin (13.3%) groups (p = 0.19) or pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin groups (p = 0.57). Adverse event rates varied: nausea, insomnia, hyperhidrosis and decreased appetite were reported significantly more often in patients treated with duloxetine vs. patients treated with pregabalin (each p ≤ 0.01); insomnia significantly more in patients treated with duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin (p = 0.01); peripheral oedema significantly more in patients treated with pregabalin vs. duloxetine and duloxetine plus gabapentin (p ≤ 0.001 each) and nausea, hyperhidrosis, decreased appetite and vomiting significantly more in patients treated with duloxetine plus gabapentin vs. pregabalin (each p ≤ 0.05). At end-point, weight change differed significantly among treatment groups: patients in the pregabalin group on average gained weight (1.0 ± 0.04 kg); while, patients in the duloxetine and duloxetine plus gabapentin groups on average lost weight (-2.39 ± 0.04 and -1.06 ± 0.04 kg, respectively) (pregabalin vs. duloxetine, p ≤ 0.001; pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin, p ≤ 0.001; duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Duloxetine, pregabalin and duloxetine plus gabapentin were generally safe and tolerable for the treatment of DPNP.

Responsiveness of the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) scale in a trial of duloxetine for treatment of osteoarthritis knee pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)-scale scores in patients taking duloxetine or placebo and to characterize the responsiveness of the ICOAP by comparing the effect size associated with its scales to effect sizes seen with other pain scales used in this study. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from a 10-week, double-blind, randomized, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled patients who had persistent moderate pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, despite having received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. The pain measures used in this study (focusing on the drug-placebo difference at week 8) were patient-rated pain severity, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the ICOAP. RESULTS: The mean difference between duloxetine and placebo at week 8 for patient-rated pain severity, the BPI average pain, WOMAC pain, and each ICOAP scale was statistically significant (P < 0.001 for each). The ICOAP total showed a moderate effect size of 0.53, whereas the constant and intermittent scores showed effect sizes of 0.47 and 0.49, respectively. The patient-rated pain severity and the BPI average pain showed similar moderate effect sizes of 0.59 and 0.53, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated efficacy of duloxetine compared with placebo when using the ICOAP scale in a placebo-controlled trial. The observed treatment effect size for the ICOAP scores was similar to that for other reliable, valid and responsive pain assessments. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT01018680.

Duloxetine added to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of knee pain due to osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of duloxetine when added to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee with pain of moderate or greater severity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 10-week randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose (duloxetine 60/120 mg/day), placebo-controlled trial that enrolled adult outpatients who had persistent moderate pain (≥4 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale) due to OA of the knee, despite, per protocol, having received optimized oral NSAID therapy (specific drug, dose, and frequency at investigator discretion). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01018680. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients entered daily pain ratings in a telephone-based diary. The primary efficacy outcome was the weekly mean of the daily average pain rating at week 8. Safety outcomes were assessed during the entire 10-week study. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients randomly received duloxetine 60/120 mg/day (N = 264) or placebo (N = 260). In total, 74% of the patients completed the study. Mean age was 61 years (SD 9.2), 57% were female, and 81% were white. Duloxetine-treated patients had significantly greater pain reduction at week 8 (p < 0.001) than placebo-treated patients. In addition, relative to placebo at week 8, duloxetine-treated patients had significant improvements in physical function as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (p < 0.001), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (p < 0.001). Compared to placebo, significantly more nausea, dry mouth, constipation, fatigue and decreased appetite were reported by patients taking duloxetine (each p < 0.05). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more commonly in the duloxetine group than the placebo group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Duloxetine added to oral NSAID therapy provided additional significant pain reduction, improved function, and patient-rated impression of improvement. Adverse events were consistent with those seen in previous duloxetine trials. The short duration of the study may not reflect the longer term efficacy and safety of NSAID/duloxetine cotherapy.

The impact of analytic method on interpretation of outcomes in longitudinal clinical trials.

AIMS: Various analytical strategies for addressing missing data in clinical trials are utilised in reporting study results. The most commonly used analytical methods include the last observation carried forward (LOCF), observed case (OC) and the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Each method requires certain assumptions regarding the characteristics of the missing data. If the assumptions for any particular method are not valid, results from that method can be biased. Results based on these different analytical methods can, therefore, be inconsistent, thereby making interpretation of clinical study results confusing. In this investigation, we compare results from MMRM, LOCF and OC in order to illustrate the potential biases and problems in interpretation. METHODS: Data from an 8-month, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled (placebo; n = 137), outpatient depression clinical trial comparing a serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor (SNRI; n = 273) with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI; n = 274) were used. The study visit schedule included efficacy and safety assessments weekly to week 4, bi-weekly to week 8, and then monthly. Visitwise mean changes for the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)) Maier subscale (primary efficacy outcome), blood pressure, and body weight were analysed using LOCF, MMRM and OC. RESULTS: Last observation carried forward consistently underestimated within-group mean changes in efficacy (benefit) and safety (risk) for both drugs compared with MMRM, whereas OC tended to overestimate within-group changes. CONCLUSIONS: Inferences are based on between-group comparisons. Therefore, whether or not underestimating (overestimating) within-group changes was conservative or anticonservative depended on the relative magnitude of the bias in each treatment and on whether within-group changes represented improvement or worsening. Preference should be given in analytic plans to methods whose assumptions are more likely to be valid rather than relying on a method based on the hope that its results, if biased, will be conservative.

Using non-linear methods to investigate the criterion validity of traffic-psychological test batteries.

In several countries in Europe (among others Germany and Austria) persons who have lost their drivers licence have to undergo a psychological test in order to regain their licence. The article discusses the validity of two test batteries of the Expert System Traffic using standardized driving tests [Schuhfried, G., 2005. Manual Expert System Traffic (XPSV). Schuhfried GmbH, Mödling]. A global evaluation of the respondents' performance in a standardized driving test was used as criterion measure in order to divide the subjects into drivers, who were classified as relatively safe or unsafe according to their performance in a standardized driving test. Artificial neural networks were used to calculate the criterion validity. This yielded superior classification rates and validity coefficients compared to classical multivariate methods such as a logistic regression. The stability and generalizability of the results was empirically demonstrated using a jack-knife validation, an internal bootstrap validation and an independent validation sample which completed the test batteries and the standardized driving test as part of a so-called traffic-psychological assessment which is compulsory in Austria in all cases, where the driver's licence has been withdrawn, e.g., when caught driving under the influence of alcohol. Moreover, the procedure allows calculating incremental validities which enable the assessment of the relative importance of the individual predictor variables. This contributes to the transparency of the results obtained with artificial neural networks. In summary it can be said that the results provide empirical evidence of the validity of the traffic-psychological tests batteries used in this study. The practical implications of the results for traffic-psychological assessment are described.

A prospective open-label treatment trial of olanzapine monotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of olanzapine in the treatment of acute mania in children and adolescents. METHODS: This was an 8-week, open-label, prospective study of olanzapine monotherapy (dose range 2.5-20 mg/day) involving 23 bipolar youths (manic, mixed, or hypomanic; 5-14 years old). Weekly assessments were made using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impressions Severity Scale (CGI-S), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Children's Depression Rating Scale. Adverse events were assessed through self-reports, vital sign and weight monitoring, laboratory analytes, and extrapyramidal symptom rating scales (Barnes Akathisia Scale, Simpson-Angus Scale, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale). RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 23 youths (96%) completed the study. Olanzapine treatment was associated with significant improvement in mean YMRS score (-19.0 +/- 9.2, p < 0.001). Using predefined criteria for improvement of > or = 30% decline in the YMRS and a CGI-S Mania score of < or = 3 at endpoint, the overall response rate was 61%. Overall, olanzapine was well tolerated, and extrapyramidal symptom measures were not significantly different from baseline. Body weight increased significantly over the study (5.0 +/- 2.3 kg, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Open-label olanzapine treatment was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of acute mania in youths with bipolar disorder. Future placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are warranted.

Olanzapine versus haloperidol in schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

BACKGROUND: The present analysis was performed on data from a subsample of patients with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, who participated in a multicenter, double-blind study comparing olanzapine to haloperidol. METHODS: Patients with schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, characterized as currently manic, mixed, depressed, or euthymic, were assessed weekly for 6 weeks during treatment with either olanzapine or haloperidol. Manic symptoms were measured using the sum of six items of the BPRS, and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. In addition, cognitive functioning was measured using the sum of seven items from the PANSS. Repeated measures analyses were performed using random coefficients regression of the serial measurement of manic, cognitive, and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: A significant treatment difference was detected overall, indicating that olanzapine was significantly more effective than haloperidol in reducing symptoms of depression and improving patients' cognitive symptoms. The superiority of olanzapine over haloperidol in the reduction of manic symptoms did not reach statistical significance (P=.052). The greatest improvement in both manic and cognitive symptoms was seen in the olanzapine-treated 'currently manic' subgroup, and least improvement in the haloperidol-treated 'euthymic' subgroup. Depressive symptoms were most improved in the olanzapine-treated 'depressed' subgroup, and least improved in the corresponding haloperidol subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, olanzapine was superior to haloperidol with respect to thymoleptic effects in patients with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

Efficacy of olanzapine in acute bipolar mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Olanzipine HGGW Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and safety of olanzapine vs placebo for the treatment of acute bipolar mania. METHODS: Four-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study. A total of 115 patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder, manic or mixed, were randomized to olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 55), or placebo (n = 60). The primary efficacy measure was the Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) total score. Response and euthymia were defined, a priori, as at least a 50% improvement from baseline to end point and as a score of no less than 12 at end point in the Y-MRS total score, respectively. Safety was assessed using adverse events, Extrapyramidal Symptom (EPS) rating scales, laboratory values, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and weight change. RESULTS: Olanzapine-treated patients demonstrated a statistically significant greater mean (+/- SD) improvement in Y-MRS total score than placebo-treated patients (-14.8 +/- 12.5 and -8.1 +/- 12.7, respectively; P<.001), which was evident at the first postbaseline observation 1 week after randomization and was maintained throughout the study (last observation carried forward). Olanzapine-treated patients demonstrated a higher rate of response (65% vs 43%, respectively; P =.02) and euthymia (61% vs 36%, respectively; P =. 01) than placebo-treated patients. There were no statistically significant differences in EPSs between groups. However, olanzapine-treated patients had a statistically significant greater mean (+/- SD) weight gain than placebo-treated patients (2.1 +/- 2.8 vs 0.45 +/- 2.3 kg, respectively) and also experienced more treatment-emergent somnolence (21 patients [38.2%] vs 5 [8.3% ], respectively). CONCLUSION: Olanzapine demonstrated greater efficacy than placebo in the treatment of acute bipolar mania and was generally well tolerated.

Reducing relapse in depressed outpatients with atypical features: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and atypical features have reactive mood plus at least two symptoms: hypersomnia, hyperphagia, leaden paralysis or a lifetime sensitivity to rejection. These patients respond to cognitive therapy (CT) or phenelzine (PHZ) significantly more than pill placebo (PBO). The purpose of this report is to motivate research on tolerable continuation phase treatment designed to reduce the significant risk of relapse and recurrence which depressed patients with atypical features face. METHODS: Outpatients with DSM-III-R MDD and atypical features who responded to acute-phase CT, clinical management plus PHZ or PBO (n = 31) were randomized to continue or discontinue treatment for 8 months and participate in 16 months or treatment-free follow-up. RESULTS: A log-rank test showed that the relapse and recurrence-free survival over the 24 months after the acute phase was significantly greater for the responders who continued treatment than for those who discontinued treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of relapse and recurrence were significantly higher for patients whose treatment was discontinued than for those whose treatment continued (83 vs 49% based on unblinded ratings of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for MDD or of self/other referral for treatment of depressive symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: We note several important limitations of the design and analysis of these pilot data. We hypothesize that not only pharmacotherapy, but also CT used as a continuation phase treatment may reduce relapse in this population. This hypothesis warrants rigorous evaluation in samples of outpatients with MDD and atypical features that are large enough to allow comparative tests.

Biliary bile acids in primary biliary cirrhosis: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Bile acid composition in fasting duodenal bile was assessed at entry and at 2 years in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (10-12 mg/kg/d) taken as a single bedtime dose. Specimens were analyzed by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method that had been validated against gas chromatography. Percent composition in bile (mean +/- SD) for 98 patients at entry for cholic (CA), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), deoxycholic (DCA), lithocholic (LCA), and ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) acids, respectively, were 57.4 +/- 18.6, 31.5 +/- 15.5, 8.0 +/- 9.3, 0.3 +/- 1.0, and 0.6 +/- 0.9. Values for CA were increased, whereas those for CDCA, DCA, LCA, and UDCA were decreased when compared with values in normal persons. Bile acid composition of the major bile acids did not change after 2 years on placebo medication. By contrast, in patients receiving UDCA for 2 years, bile became enriched with UDCA on average to 40.1%, and significant decreases were noted for CA (to 32.2%) and CDCA (to 19.5%). No change in percent composition was observed for DCA and LCA. Percent composition at entry and changes in composition after 2 years on UDCA were similar in patients with varying severity of PBC. In patients whose bile was not enriched in UDCA (entry and placebo-treated specimens), CA, CDCA, DCA, and the small amount of UDCA found in some of these specimens were conjugated to a greater extent with glycine (52%-64%) than with taurine (36%-48%). Treatment with UDCA caused the proportion of all endogenous bile acids conjugated with glycine to increase to 69% to 78%, while the proportion conjugated with taurine (22%-31%) fell (P <.05). Administered UDCA was also conjugated predominantly with glycine (87%).

Treatment of atypical depression with cognitive therapy or phenelzine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atypical depression are more likely to respond to monoamine oxidase inhibitors than to tricyclic antidepressants. They are frequently offered psychotherapy in the absence of controlled tests. There are no prospective, randomized, controlled trials, to our knowledge, of psychotherapy for atypical depression or of cognitive therapy compared with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Since there is only 1 placebo-controlled trial of cognitive therapy, this trial fills a gap in the literature on psychotherapy for depression. METHODS: Outpatients with DSM-III-R major depressive disorder and atypical features (N = 108) were treated in a 10-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing acute-phase cognitive therapy or clinical management plus either phenelzine sulfate or placebo. Atypical features were defined as reactive mood plus at least 2 additional symptoms: hypersomnia, hyperphagia, leaden paralysis, or lifetime sensitivity to rejection. RESULTS: With the use of an intention-to-treat strategy, the response rates (21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score, < or =9) were significantly greater after cognitive therapy (58%) and phenelzine (58%) than after pill placebo (28%). Phenelzine and cognitive therapy also reduced symptoms significantly more than placebo according to contrasts after a repeated-measures analysis of covariance and random regression with the use of the blind evaluator's final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score. The scores between cognitive therapy and phenelzine did not differ significantly. Supplemental analyses of other symptom severity measures confirm the finding. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive therapy may offer an effective alternative to standard acute-phase treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor for outpatients with major depressive disorder and atypical features.

Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4, other risk factors, and course of Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: The epsilon 4 allele of apolipoprotein E (apoE epsilon 4) is associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its relationship to various aspects of AD has become increasingly unclear. We studied the relationship of apoE genotype in AD to educational attainment, history of heart disease or head injury, age of onset, gender, severity of illness, depression, psychotic symptoms, rate of dementia progression, and time from initial evaluation to nursing home placement. METHODS: ApoE epsilon 4 genotype was determined for 97 clinically diagnosed AD patients and 61 neuropathologically confirmed cases of AD. RESULTS: Presence of one or more epsilon 4 alleles occurred in 66% of AD cases as compared with 27% in control subjects (allele frequency was .40 for AD, .15 for control subjects). Among AD subjects there was no significant relationship between epsilon 4 alleles and educational attainment, history of heart disease, head injury, age of onset, severity of illness, depression, history of depression, rate of dementia progression, or time to nursing home placement. Marginal correlations emerged between number of epsilon 4 alleles, and delusions (p = .05) and hallucinations (p = .05). There was a trend toward increased epsilon 4 homozygosity in patients with onset between ages 65 and 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that individuals with one or two apoE epsilon 4 alleles differed significantly in clinical course of AD from those without epsilon 4 except for a trend toward increased psychotic symptoms in the group as a whole and an increase in epsilon 4 homozygosity in patients with reported symptom onset in the late 60s.

Neocortical synapse density and Braak stage in the Lewy body variant of Alzheimer disease: a comparison with classic Alzheimer disease and normal aging.

Substantial numbers of cortical and subcortical Lewy bodies are seen in approximately one quarter of patients whose brains show sufficient histopathologic changes for a neuropathologic diagnosis of definite Alzheimer disease (AD). This subset of cases has been named the Lewy body variant of AD (LBV). Despite comparable dementia and the presence of neocortical senile plaques in LBV patients, the overall burden of neuropathologic changes, in particular neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), is less than in classic AD. While NFT frequency correlates with dementia severity in classic AD, the cognitive impairment in patients with LBV cannot be completely explained by such changes. Since several studies have suggested a role for synapse loss in relation to dementia severity in classic AD, we decided to investigate the role of synapse loss as a candidate for the cognitive impairment of LBV. The Braak staging method is based upon the distribution and severity of neurofibrillary changes, and one therefore would expect LBV cases to be assigned to lower Braak stages. In the present study we assigned a Braak stage to 14 LBV cases, 31 classic AD cases, and a group of 10 non-demented aged controls. We compared the severity of synapse loss as determined by ELISA immunoassay for synaptophysin and Braak stage among the three diagnostic groups. When compared to normal controls, synaptophysin concentrations were statistically significantly lower in both demented groups. There was comparable synapse loss in LBV and AD despite significantly lower Braak stages in the LBV cases. These results suggest a major role for loss of synapses as the substrate of cognitive impairment in LBV.

Correlation of bcl-2, p53, and MIB-1 expression with ependymoma grade and subtype.

In this study, we report our results on the proliferative activity of ependymomas as determined by MIB-1 (also known as Ki-67) immunohistochemical analysis, and we compare our results with those obtained by immunolabeling with monoclonal antibodies to p53 and bcl-2 proteins to assess whether expression correlated with ependymoma subtype or tumor grade. The study included 4 myxopapillary ependymomas (Grade I of the World Health Organization [WHO] scale), 10 subependymomas (WHO Grade I), 17 ependymomas (WHO Grade II), 2 papillary ependymomas (WHO grade II), and 4 anaplastic ependymomas (WHO Grade III). The MIB-1 proliferation index was significantly higher in tumors diagnosed as anaplastic ependymoma (P < .001), with a moderate level of correlation (Kendall's tau-b = 0.557, asymptotic standard error = 108). In addition, one ependymoma (WHO Grade II) not considered overtly anaplastic by routine histologic criteria showed a high MIB-1 labeling index, suggesting that the MIB-1 proliferation index might be a more objective indicator of tumor grade. The remaining WHO Grade I and Grade II ependymomas showed low proliferative activity. bcl-2 oncoprotein expression was identified in all of the four myxopapillary and in both papillary ependymomas. An additional observation was the correlation of p53 expression with increasing WHO grade. These data suggest that high MIB-1 and p53 immunolabeling might be objective indicators of high grade in ependymomas that do not otherwise meet routine histologic criteria for high-grade ependymoma. Subsequent clinicopathologic analyses will be important in assessing whether these markers are useful as independent predictors of survival.

Neuropathologic evidence that the Lewy body variant of Alzheimer disease represents coexistence of Alzheimer disease and idiopathic Parkinson disease.

We undertook this study to investigate the neuropathologic relationships among Alzheimer disease (AD), idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD), and the Lewy body variant of AD (AD/LBV). We retrieved 30 autopsy cases in which Lewy bodies (LB) had been identified in the substantia nigra (SN) in routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Twenty-two of the cases had a primary clinical diagnosis of dementia and neuropathologic changes of AD; 12 of these demented patients also had clinical parkinsonism. Eight cases had clinical and neuropathologic evidence of PD with minimal or no AD neuropathology, though 6 had clinical dementia. Controls consisted of 6 cases of AD without SN LB by hematoxylin-eosin, and 5 neurologically normal aged controls. Paraffin sections of SN, superior temporal gyrus, and cingulate gyrus from each case were immunostained with rabbit anti-ubiquitin antiserum, randomized, and analyzed individually by light microscopy, and the density of LB-like profiles in each section were graded. None of 5 nondemented aged controls showed any neocortical LB, even though 2 had significant numbers of incidental SN LB by ubiquitin immunostaining. Of 6 AD cases without SN LB by hematoxylin-eosin, 3 had rare SN LB on ubiquitin stain, 1 of which showed rare neocortical Lewy-like profiles. Seven of 8 PD cases showed neocortical LB, including the 6 with dementia. Twenty-one of 22 AD cases with SN LB showed ubiquitin-immunoreactive Lewy-like bodies in the neocortex that were statistically significantly greater in number than in either pure PD or pure AD cases. The frequent occurrence of LB in the neocortex in PD alone suggests that AD/LBV likely represents mixed AD/PD. However, AD neuropathology may favor or promote the formation of neocortical LB in patients who go on to develop mixed AD/PD pathology.

Relationship of uric acid concentrations and severe intraventricular hemorrhage/leukomalacia in the premature infant.

The purine metabolite hypoxanthine accumulates with hypoxia ischemia and with reperfusion is converted to uric acid (UA). We hypothesized that elevated UA concentration is a marker of previous hypoxia ischemia and would identify infants at greatest risk for having subsequent intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)/periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). We determined the relationship between UA concentrations in the first postnatal day and the development of severe IVH, PVL, or both in 58 infants of birth weight 865 +/- 177 gm and gestational age 27 +/- 2 weeks. Severe IVH developed in 10 (17%) infants and PVL in 3 (5.1%) infants. UA concentrations on day 1 (obtained at 16 +/- 4 hours) were 7.9 +/- 2.8 mg/dl and increased to 9.5 +/- 2.58 mg/dl on day 2. UA concentrations on day 1 were higher in infants with severe IVH/PVL versus those in infants with neither condition: 10.2 vs 7.3 mg/dl (p = 0.005). Infants with hyperkalemia on the second postnatal day had higher UA concentrations on the first day versus infants with normal potassium levels: 11.7 +/- 2 mg/dl versus 6.8 +/- 1.8 mg/dl (p < 0.0005). Infants with severe IVH/PVL had higher potassium levels on day 2 versus infants with neither condition: 11.9 vs 6.9 mg/dl (p < 0.048). By univariate analysis UA concentrations were significantly related to gestational age (p = 0.005) and birth weight (p = 0.03). Only UA concentration (p = 0.004) and gestational age (p = 0.02) were related to IVH/PVL. By multivariate analysis UA remained significantly related to IVH/PVL even when adjusted for other clinical variables, with an odds ratio estimate of 1.63 (95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.31). In conclusion, higher UA concentrations on the first postnatal day were associated with the subsequent development of severe IVH/PVL and with subsequent hyperkalemia. Elevated UA concentrations in the first postnatal day may help to identify a subset of premature infants at greatest risk for having subsequent hemorrhagic ischemic injury.

Is there a role for continuation phase cognitive therapy for depressed outpatients?

Two pilot studies evaluated the rate of relapse or recurrence (i.e., major depressive disorder) after cognitive therapy (CT). Two sequential cohorts included outpatients who responded to acute phase CT (A-CT) and who agreed to monthly, treatment-free follow-up. In Study 1, the Kaplan-Meier technique estimated relapse and recurrence rates of 40% at 6 months, 45% at 8 months, 50% at 12 months, 67% at 18 months, and 74% at 24 months. In Study 2, responders to A-CT received 8 months (10 sessions) of continuation phase CT (C-CT). In Study 2, relapse or recurrence was 20% at 6 and 8 months, 27% at 12 months, and 36% at 18 and 24 months after A-CT. An exploratory log-rank test showed that relapse or recurrence-free survival was greater in Study 2 than in Study 1. If replicated, this result suggests that C-CT can reduce depressive relapse or recurrence. Alternative explanations are presented.

Cortisol secretion and Alzheimer's disease progression.

BACKGROUND: Mild hypercortisolemia is a frequent concomitant of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In an effort to ascertain the relationship between serum cortisol concentration (CORT) and disease progression, aging, and survival, we followed 9 persons with AD, ages from 56 to 84 years, from an original cohort of 19 enrollees with serial cognitive testing and CORT determinations. METHODS: The cognitive instrument was a modification of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (mADAS-COG). Serum cortisol determinations were performed at noon, and an Afternoon Cortisol Test (ACT) was used to obtain an estimate of average CORT. RESULTS: Baseline 12:00 hours CORT but not ACT correlated significantly with the change in mADAS-COG (r = .90, p < .01). ACT levels increased as the mADAS-COG increased over time (p = .037), by 0.156 +/- 0.06 microgram/dL for each one-point increase (indicating greater impairment) in cognitive test score. ACT levels did not increase significantly simply with aging. For the entire cohort of 19 subjects, neither baseline ACT nor 12:00 hours CORT was significantly related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercortisolemia in AD appears related to the clinical progression of the disease, but not to aging or length of survival.

Expression of telomerase RNA component correlates with the MIB-1 proliferation index in ependymomas.

Although there is general agreement that certain morphologic subtypes of ependymoma are benign, the biologic behavior of other ependymal neoplasms is poorly understood and not clearly related to conventional histopathologic criteria. The absence of universally accepted standards has prompted the search for more objective biologic markers. Telomerase is an RNA-containing enzyme associated with immortality in proliferating stem cells and many tumors. We investigated the proliferative activity of 26 ependymomas as determined by MIB-1 immunolabeling and compared the results with the in situ expression of human telomerase RNA (hTR) and WHO tumor grade. The study included 9 WHO grade I ependymomas (6 subependymomas and 3 myxopapillary ependymomas), 13 WHO grade II ependymomas, and 4 anaplastic (WHO grade III) ependymomas. The proliferation index (PI) and telomerase RNA expression were significantly increased in grade III ependymomas (p < 0.0001 for PI and p = 0.0015 for hTR). In these tumors, the PI and hTR expression were highly correlated (p = 0.0001). Of note, a single case designated grade II showed both increased proliferative activity and the highest hTR expression detected in this series of ependymal neoplasms. Our results suggest that the PI and hTR expression may be important biologic markers, independent of other histopathologic criteria of tumor grade. Future studies examining the correlation of MIB-1 cell kinetics and hTR expression with clinical parameters in selected ependymoma subtypes are needed to determine the prognostic relevance of these markers.

Pregnancy-induced hypertension and reduced intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants.

Increasing evidence suggests that the incidence of periventricular intraventricular hemorrhage (PV-IVH) is lower in infants born to mothers with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). The mechanism or mechanisms accounting for this reduction remain unclear but may be related to PIH itself, medications used to treat the mother (e.g., magnesium sulfate), or to obstetrical management. In this retrospective analysis, we determined the incidence of PV-IVH in singleton preterm infants weighing less than 1,500 gm born to mothers with PIH who were also administered magnesium sulfate. Between January 1988 and December 1994, 254 singleton infants born to mothers with PIH and 1,083 born to mothers without PIH were studied. PV-IVH developed in 360 (26.9%) of the 1,337 infants; 977 (74.1%) infants did not exhibit PV-IVH. The incidence of total as well as severe PV-IVH was lower in infants born to mothers with PIH than in those without PIH [i.e., 16% vs 30% (total) and 8.2% vs 14.5% (severe), P < .001] with an odds ratio (OR) estimate of 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30, 0.61]. Infants born to mothers with PIH weighed more, (1,152 +/- 250 gm vs 1,058 +/- 283 gm, P < .001) and were more mature (30.1 +/- 2.9 vs 27.7 +/- 31 weeks, P < .001) than infants born to mothers without PIH. These infants were also less likely to be exposed to labor (57% vs 93%), to be delivered by cesarean section (81% vs 35%), and to require intubation (49% vs 58%), but more likely to exhibit respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (47% vs 38%, P < .01). By logistic regression analysis, after seven variables (i.e., PIH, gestational age, and birthweight, both modeled as cubic polynomials; labor; intubation; RDS; and race) were included in the analytic model, PIH remained a significant predictor of IVH: P = .006, OR = 0.54 (95% CI 0.349, 0.847). These data indicate a significantly lower incidence of PV-IVH of approximately 50% in infants born to mothers with PIH as compared with the incidence in infants born to mothers without PIH, despite their higher incidence of RDS. The reduction in PV-IVH may be directly related to the PIH; however, the independent role of antenatal magnesium sulfate administration requires further study.