Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Subst Abus ; 42(2): 205-212, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684331

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has exacerbated income inequality, structural racism, and social isolation-issues that drive addiction and have previously manifested in the epidemic of opioid-associated overdose. The co-existence of these epidemics has necessitated care practice changes, including the use of telehealth-based encounters for the diagnosis and management of opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: We describe the development of the "Addiction Telehealth Program" (ATP), a telephone-based program to reduce treatment access barriers for people with substance use disorders staying at San Francisco's COVID-19 Isolation and Quarantine (I&Q) sites. Telehealth encounters were documented in the electronic medical record and an internal tracking system for the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) COVID-19 Containment Response. Descriptive statistics were collected on a case series of patients initiated on buprenorphine at I&Q sites and indicators of feasibility were measured. RESULTS: Between April 10 and May 25, 2020, ATP consulted on the management of opioid, alcohol, GHB, marijuana, and stimulant use for 59 I&Q site guests. Twelve patients were identified with untreated OUD and newly prescribed buprenorphine. Of these, all were marginally housed, 67% were Black, and 58% had never previously been prescribed medications for OUD. Four self-directed early discharge from I&Q-1 prior to and 3 after initiating buprenorphine. Of the remaining 8 patients, 7 reported continuing to take buprenorphine at the time of I&Q discharge and 1 discontinued. No patients started on buprenorphine sustained significant adverse effects, required emergency care, or experienced overdose. CONCLUSIONS: ATP demonstrates the feasibility of telephone-based management of OUD among a highly marginalized patient population in San Francisco and supports the implementation of similar programs in areas of the U.S. where access to addiction treatment is limited. Legal changes permitting the prescribing of buprenorphine via telehealth without the requirement of an in-person visit should persist beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Marijuana Abuse/therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Quarantine , Telemedicine/methods , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Methadone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco , Sodium Oxybate , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telephone
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 57(5): 1373-83, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22466077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have found that a major proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) do not receive antiviral therapy. The objective of this study was to characterize treatment eligibility on the basis of current guidelines, determine whether eligible patients actually receive treatment, and examine associated predictors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were evaluated for CHB at two community gastroenterology clinics between April 2007 and February 2009. Using criteria published by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) in 2007-2009 and by a panel of US hepatologists (US Panel) in 2006-2008, treatment eligibility was determined for the patients. RESULTS: Of 612 consecutive CHB patients included, mean age was 44 ± 13 years, 54 % were male, and 99 % were Asian. Half (51 %) were eligible for treatment on the basis of the US Panel algorithm and 47 % of these patients also met AASLD treatment criteria. Overall, antiviral therapy was initiated for 50 % of eligible patients: 72 % of AASLD-eligible patients and 29 % of patients who were US Panel-eligible only. Independent predictors for actual treatment initiation were higher ALT for AASLD-eligible patients and higher ALT and older age for patients who were US Panel-eligible only. The leading reasons for nontreatment were further observation recommended by the physician, followed by loss of follow-up and patient refusal. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the CHB patients evaluated at community referral clinics met treatment criteria of at least one guideline; however, only about half received antiviral therapy within 12 months of presentation. Further studies are needed to optimize treatment of eligible CHB patients.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Eligibility Determination , Guideline Adherence , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Alanine Transaminase/metabolism , Asian , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , DNA, Viral/blood , Data Collection , Eligibility Determination/methods , Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/ethnology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/metabolism , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , United States/ethnology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...