Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Arch Dermatol ; 143(2): 239-42, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17310004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate the current severity criteria of mild, moderate, and severe psoriasis and to make recommendations concerning a 2-tiered categorization of severity based on current clinical practice and related to intent to treat. PARTICIPANTS: This volunteer task force, led by David M. Pariser, MD, included Jerry Bagel, MD, Joel M. Gelfand, MD, MSCE, Neil J. Korman, MD, PhD, Christopher T. Ritchlin, MD, Bruce E. Strober, MD, PhD, Abby S. Van Voorhees, MD, and Melodie Young, MSN, RN, ANP. Meetings were held by teleconference and were coordinated and funded by the National Psoriasis Foundation. EVIDENCE: This task force reviewed psoriasis severity criteria and other published psoriasis consensus statements. Current standards of care and expert opinion were used to inform the process. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Based on meetings of the task force and under the guidance of David M. Pariser, MD, a statement was drafted by Elizabeth J. Horn, PhD, presented to the task force, and reviewed and approved by the task force. This statement was then reviewed and approved by Robert E. Kalb, MD, Gerald G. Krueger, MD, and Alan Menter, MD. The National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board reviewed and endorsed this statement by a majority vote on March 2, 2006, at the medical board meeting. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical consensus statement proposes a 2-tiered system for plaque psoriasis therapy that reflects more accurately than the current system how patients are treated in clinical practice. This statement, focused on plaque psoriasis, is intended to assist medical professionals and insurance payers in understanding these 2 categories of patients with psoriasis and choosing appropriate therapies for these patients.


Subject(s)
Psoriasis/classification , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Needs Assessment , Psoriasis/pathology , Psoriasis/psychology , Quality of Life
3.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 17(6): 359-61, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17853310

ABSTRACT

The use of phototherapy for psoriasis has declined because of inconvenience, managed care disincentives, and poor reimbursements. However, phototherapy is safer than other options, and the efficacy rates for different methods of phototherapy are among the highest of all available treatment options. Phototherapy is also one of the least costly treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We hypothesize that utilization management controls on phototherapy shift patients to more expensive and risky systemic treatments. Reducing disincentives on phototherapy will benefit both patients and payors, while increasing physicians' ability to manage this debilitating disease.


Subject(s)
Phototherapy/statistics & numerical data , Psoriasis/therapy , Utilization Review , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Phototherapy/economics , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...