ABSTRACT
BackgroundInformation on the safety and immunogenicity of the omicron BA.4/BA.5-containing bivalent booster mRNA-1273.222 are needed. MethodsIn this ongoing, phase 2/3 trial, 50-g mRNA-1273.222 (25-g each ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron BA.4/BA.5 spike mRNAs) is compared to 50-g mRNA-1273, administered as second boosters in adults who previously received a 2-injection (100-g) primary series and first booster (50-g) dose of mRNA-1273. The primary objectives were safety and immunogenicity 28 days post-boost. ResultsParticipants received 50-g of mRNA-1273 (n=376) or mRNA-1273.222 (n=511) as second booster doses. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and ancestral SARS-CoV-2 D614G neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs [95% confidence interval]) after mRNA-1273.222 (2324.6 [1921.2-2812.7] and 7322.4 [6386.2-8395.7]) were significantly higher than mRNA-1273 (488.5 [427.4-558.4] and 5651.4 (5055.7-6317.3) respectively, at day 29 post-boost in participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2-infection. A randomly selected subgroup (N=60) of participants in the mRNA-1273.222 group also exhibited cross-neutralization against the emerging omicron variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1. No new safety concerns were identified with mRNA-1273.222. Vaccine effectiveness was not assessed in this study; in an exploratory analysis 1.6% (8/511) of mRNA-1273.222 recipients had Covid-19 post-boost. ConclusionThe bivalent omicron BA.4/BA.5-containing vaccine mRNA-1273.222 elicited superior neutralizing antibody responses against BA.4/BA.5 compared to mRNA-1273, with no safety concerns identified. (Supported by Moderna; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927065)
ABSTRACT
BackgroundUpdated vaccination strategies against acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern are needed. Interim results of the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent omicron-containing mRNA-1273.214 booster candidate are presented. MethodsIn this ongoing, phase 2/3 trial, the 50-g bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 (25-g each ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron B.1.1.529 spike SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs) was compared to the authorized 50-g mRNA-1273 booster in adults who previously received 2-dose primary series of 100-g mRNA-1273 and a first booster dose of 50-g mRNA-1273 at least 3 months prior. Primary objectives were safety and reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of 50-g mRNA-1273.214 compared with 50-g mRNA-1273. Immunogenicity data 28 days after the booster dose are presented. ResultsFour hundred thirty-seven and 377 participants received 50-g of mRNA-1273.214, or mRNA-1273, respectively. Median time between first and second booster doses of mRNA-1273.214 and mRNA-1273 were similar (136 and 134 days, respectively). In participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, observed omicron neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs [95% confidence interval]) after the mRNA-1273.214 and mRNA-1273 booster doses, were 2372.4 (2070.6-2718.2) and 1473.5 (1270.8-1708.4) respectively and the model-based GMT ratio (97.5% confidence interval) was 1.75 (1.49-2.04). All pre-specified non-inferiority (ancestral SARS-CoV-2 with D614G mutation [D614G] GMT ratio; ancestral SARS-CoV-2 [D614G] and omicron seroresponse rates difference) and superiority primary objectives (omicron GMT ratio) for mRNA-1273.214 compared to mRNA-1273 were met. Additionally, mRNA-1273.214 50-g induced a potent neutralizing antibody response against omicron subvariants BA.4/BA.5 and higher binding antibody responses against alpha, beta, gamma, delta and omicron variants. Safety and reactogenicity profiles were similar and well-tolerated for both vaccines groups. ConclusionThe bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 50-g was well-tolerated and elicited a superior neutralizing antibody response against omicron, compared to mRNA-1273 50-g, and a non-inferior neutralizing antibody response against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (D614G), 28 days after immunization, creating a new tool as we respond to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
ABSTRACT
ImportanceDue to the emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, evaluation of boosters is needed. ObjectivesEvaluate safety and immunogenicity of 100-{micro}g of mRNA-1273 booster dose in adults. DesignOpen-label, Phase 2/3 study. SettingMulticenter study at 8 sites in the U.S. ParticipantsThe mRNA-1273 100-{micro}g booster was administered to adults who previously received a two dose primary series of 100-{micro}g mRNA-1273 in the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) trial, at least 6 months earlier. InterventionLipid nanoparticle containing 100-{micro}g of mRNA encoding the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-HU-1). Main Outcomes and MeasuresSolicited local and systemic adverse reactions, and unsolicited adverse events were collected after vaccination. Primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of the neutralizing antibody (nAb) response against SARS-CoV-2 based on the geometric mean titer (GMTs) and the seroresponse rates (SRRs) (booster dose vs. primary series in a historical control group). nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 variants were also evaluated. ResultsThe 100-{micro}g booster dose had a greater incidence of local and systemic adverse reactions compared to the second dose of mRNA-1273 as well as the 50-{micro}g mRNA-1273 booster in separate studies. The geometric mean titers (GMTs; 95% CI) of SARS-CoV-2 nAbs against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days after the 100-{micro}g booster dose were 4039.5 (3592.7,4541.8) and 1132.0 (1046.7,1224.2) at 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [GMT ratio=3.6 (3.1,4.2)]. SRRs (95% CI) were 100% (98.6,100) at 28 days after the booster and 98.1% (96.7,99.1) 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [percentage difference=1.9% (0.4,3.3)]. The GMT ratio (GMR) and SRR difference for the booster as compared to the primary series met the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. Delta-specific nAbs also increased (GMT fold-rise=233.3) after the 100-{micro}g booster of mRNA-1273. Conclusions and RelevanceThe 100-{micro}g mRNA-1273 booster induced a robust neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, and reactogenicity was higher with the 100-{micro}g booster dose compared to the authorized booster dose level in adults (50-{micro}g). mRNA-1273 100-{micro}g booster dose can be considered when eliciting an antibody response might be challenging such as in moderately or severely immunocompromised hosts. Trial Registration: NCT04927065 Key PointsQuestion: What is the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of 100 {micro}g of mRNA-1273 in adults who previously received the primary series of mRNA-1273? Findings: In this open-label, Phase 2/3 study, the 100 {micro}g booster dose of mRNA-1273 had a greater incidence of local and systemic adverse reactions compared to a 50 {micro}g booster dose of mRNA- 1273 or after the second dose of mRNA-1273 during the primary series. The 100 {micro}g booster dose of mRNA-1273 induced a robust antibody response against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and variants. Meaning: mRNA-1273 100 {micro}g booster dose might be considered when eliciting an antibody response might be challenging, such as in moderately or severely immunocompromised hosts.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe highly transmissible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant is a global concern. This study assessed the neutralization activity of two-dose regimens of mRNA-1273 vaccination against Omicron in adults, adolescents and children. MethodsNeutralizing activity against the Omicron variant was evaluated in serum samples from adults ([≥]18 years) in the phase 3, Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) and from adolescents (12-17 years) in the TeenCOVE trials following a two-dose regimen of 100 {micro}g mRNA-1273 and from children (6-<12 years) in the KidCOVE trial administered two doses of 50 {micro}g mRNA-1273. Neutralizing antibody geometric mean ID50 titers (GMT) were measured using a lentivirus-based pseudovirus neutralizing assay at day 1 and 4 weeks (day 57) following the second mRNA-1273 dose, compared with wild-type (D614G). ResultsAt 4 weeks following a second dose of mRNA-1273 (100 {micro}g), the GMT was reduced 28.8-fold compared with D614G in adults ([≥]18 years). In adolescents (12-17 years), the GMT was 11.8-fold lower than D614G, 4 weeks after a second dose of mRNA-1273 (100 {micro}g), and compared with adults, were 1.5- and 3.8-fold higher for D614G and the Omicron variant, respectively. In children (6-<12 years), 4 weeks post-second dose of 50 {micro}g mRNA-1273, Omicron GMTs were reduced 22.1-fold versus D614G and were 2.0-fold higher for D614G and 2.5-fold higher for Omicron compared with adults. ConclusionsA two-dose regimen of 100 {micro}g mRNA-1273 in adolescents and of 50 {micro}g in children elicited neutralization responses against the Omicron variant that were reduced compared with the wild-type D614G, and numerically higher than those in adults.
ABSTRACT
Rising breakthrough infections of coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in previously immunized individuals has raised concerns for a booster to combat suspected waning immunity and new variants. Participants immunized 6-8 months earlier with a primary series of two doses of 50 or 100 {micro}g of mRNA-1273 were administered a booster injection of 50 {micro}g of mRNA-1273. Neutralizing antibody levels against wild-type virus and the Delta variant at one month after the booster were 1.7-fold and 2.1-fold higher, respectively, than those 28 days post primary series second injection indicating an immune memory response. The reactogenicity after the booster dose was similar to that after the second dose in the primary series of two doses of mRNA-1273 (50 or 100 {micro}g) with no serious adverse events reported in the one-month follow-up period. These results demonstrate that a booster injection of mRNA-1273 in previously immunized individuals stimulated an immune response greater than the primary vaccination series.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundFollowing emergency use authorization in December 2020, the Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) trial was amended to an open-label phase, where participants were unblinded and those randomized to placebo were offered vaccination. Emergence of the delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with increased incidences of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) among unvaccinated and vaccinated persons. This exploratory analysis evaluated the incidence and genetic sequences of Covid-19 cases in the ongoing COVE trial during the open-label phase, with a focus on July-August 2021, when delta-variants surged in the US. MethodsCovid-19 cases were identified in participants initially randomized to mRNA-1273 (vaccinated from July-December 2020) and those initially randomized to the placebo (vaccinated December 2020-April 2021) who received at least one dose and were SARS-CoV-2-negative at baseline in the modified-intent-to-treat population were analyzed. Included were Covid-19 cases occurring after 26-Mar-2021 with positive RT-PCR results in nasopharyngeal samples (central lab test) and reported Covid-19 symptoms. Genetic sequencing of Covid-19 cases was also performed. ResultsThere were 14,746 participants in the earlier mRNA-1273 (mRNA-1273e) group and 11,431 in the later placebo-mRNA1273 (mRNA-1273p) group. Covid-19 cases increased from the start of the open-label phase to July-August 2021. During July and August, 162 Covid-19 cases occurred in the mRNA-1273e group and 88 in the mRNA-1273p group. Of the cases sequenced, 144/149 [97%]) in the mRNA-1273 and 86/88 (99%) in the mRNA-1273p groups were attributed to delta. The incidence rate of Covid-19 was lower for the mRNA-1273p (49.0/1000 person-years) versus mRNA-1273e (77.1/1000 person-years) group [36.4% (95% CI 17.1%-51.5%) reduction]. There were fewer severe Covid-19 cases in the mRNA-1273p (6; 6.2/1000 person-years) than mRNA-1273e (13; 3.3/1000 person-years) [46.0% (95% CI -52.4%-83.2%) reduction]. Three Covid-19 related hospitalizations occurred with two resulting deaths in the mRNA-1273e group. ConclusionIncidence rates of Covid-19 and severe Covid-19 were lower during the months when delta was the dominant variant (July/August 2021) among COVE participants vaccinated more recently. Analysis of COVID-19 cases from the open-label phase of the COVE study is ongoing.
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhage is one of the commonest and dreaded complications especially with pelvic surgeries. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasias (GTN) are notorious for their propensity to bleed torrentially and metastasis to vital organs. GTN is associated with an arterio-venous malformation (AVM) about 10-15% of the time, which can lead to bleeding after surgery or after complete remission. After the failure of conventional management with chemotherapy or surgery one is compelled to take another modality of management. One of such methods is the use of transcatheter artery embolization in cases of GTN or post-hysterectomy cases of GTN. Transcatheter arteryembolization (TAE) was effective in controlling bleeding due to arterio-venous malformation in 96% of cases. CASE: 46 years P2L2A5 (para 2, living issue 2, abortion 5) post-hysterectomy patient presented with bleeding from the vagina after surgery. Twice she underwent vaginal vault repair after hysterectomy but failed. Ultrasonography (USG) showed arterio-venous malformation (AVM); angiography revealed massive extravasation from (left internal iliac artery and abnormal vascularity from the right internal iliac. She was taken up for bilateral internal iliac arteries embolization but again had a heavy bout of bleeding after one week. CT scan confirmed a residual lesion and she underwent a repeat embolization after which the bleeding stopped. Serum BHCG was advised during workup and it was 1997 IU/ml. A diagnosis of GTN was confirmed. The patient was discharged after two cycles of chemotherapy with advice to review for the third one on an outpatient department basis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that TAE is an effective and safer alternative to surgery in postoperative bleeding from AV malformation in the case of GTN. It can be repeated and should be made to more liberal use in emergency settings.
ABSTRACT
Aims@#Microbiota endogenous to oleaginous plants have attracted special attention in recent years for their biotechnological potentials and applications including the production of biodegradable biopolyester poly(3- hydroxybutyrate) [P(3HB)] as an alternative to thermoplastics. The present study is aimed to screen the endophytic bacteria of selected oleaginous plants such as Arachis hypogaea L., Brassica napus L., Brassica nigra L., Helianthus annuus L., Ricinus communis L. and Sesamum indicum L. for the production of P(3HB). @*Methodology and results@#Bacteria endogenous to the oleaginous plants were isolated from surface sterilized healthy tissues following sterilization with 70% ethanol and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and screened for P(3HB) production in mineral salts medium. Nile blue A staining method was used for detection of intracellular P(3HB), while the accumulated biopolyester was quantified spectrophotometrically following chemical conversion to chrotonic acid by treating with sulfuric acid. Five potent P(3HB) accumulating isolates have been selected and identified as Cellulosimicrobium cellulans AHS 01 (KX458038), Beijerinckia fluminensis AHR 02 (KX458039), Exiguobacterium acetylicum BNL 103 (KX458037), Bacillus toyonensis BNS 102 (KX458036) and Bacillus cereus RCL 02 (KX458035) based on morphological, physio-biochemical and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. These endogenously growing bacterial isolates accumulated intracellular biopolyester accounting 43-62% of their cell dry weight (CDW) when grown in mineral salts medium supplemented with yeast extract. Intracellular accumulation of P(3HB) by these isolates have also been confirmed by FTIR spectral analysis of lyophilized cell mass and 1HNMR spectra of the extracted polymer. @*Conclusion, significance and impact of study@#These findings, first of its kind point to exploration of endogenous bacterial communities of oil-producing plants as a potential bioresource for production of P(3HB) bioplastics in a sustainable manner.
ABSTRACT
The occurrence of a second primary cancer in a cancer survivor is well documented. It may be synchronous or metachronous. Incidence of metachronous cancer involving cervix is 0.82% to 1.33%. One such metachronous cancer is that of breast and cervix. We present a case of a woman who received tamoxifen for invasive ductal cancer of breast following a modified radical mastectomy and subsequently developed adenocarcinoma of cervix after six month of tamoxifen therapy. The role of tamoxifen in pathogenesis of cervical cancer and that of human papillomavirus infection in pathogenesis of both cancer of cervix and breast cancer has been well recognized. In our patient, the adenocarcinoma of cervix (rare occurrence) which is likely due to six month of tamoxifen therapy is a perplexing question. Women diagnosed and treated for breast cancer need to be followed up for development of other metachronous gynecological cancers.
