Priority skills for equity-focused, evidence-based cancer control in community-based organizations: A group concept mapping analysis with academics and practitioners.

Introduction: Community-based organizations (CBOs) are important equity-promoting delivery channels for evidence-based interventions (EBIs). However, CBO practitioners often cannot access needed support to build EBI skills. Additionally, the capacity-building literature is hindered by inconsistent definitions, limited use of validated measures, and an emphasis on the perspectives of EBI developers versus implementers. To address these gaps, we explored commonalities and differences between CBO practitioners and academics in conceptualizing and prioritizing core EBI skills. Methods: We utilized Group Concept Mapping, a mixed-methods approach connecting qualitative data (e.g., regarding the range of critical EBI skills) and quantitative data (e.g., sorting and ranking data regarding unique skills) to create conceptual maps integrating perspectives from diverse participants. A total of 34 practitioners and 30 academics working with cancer inequities participated in the study. Results: Participants nominated 581 core skills for EBI use, and our team (including practitioners and academics) identified 98 unique skills from this list. Participants sorted them into conceptual groups, yielding five clusters: (1) using data and evaluation, (2) selecting and adapting EBIs, (3) connecting with community members, (4) building diverse and equitable partnerships, and (5) managing EBI implementation. The ordering of importance and presence of skill clusters were similar across groups. Overall, importance was rated higher than presence, suggesting capacity gaps. Conclusions: There are helpful commonalities between practitioners' and academics' views of core EBI skills in CBOs and apparent capacity gaps. However, underlying patterns suggest that differences between the groups' perceptions warrant further exploration.

Similar skills, different frames: a thematic analysis exploring conceptualizations held by community-based organization practitioners and academics regarding skills to use evidence-based interventions to address cancer inequities.

BACKGROUND: Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical partners in delivering evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to address cancer inequities. However, CBO practitioners do not typically have access to opportunities to build the necessary capacity (skills, knowledge, motivation, and resources) for using EBIs. Although capacity-building interventions can offer a solution, inconsistent definitions and measurements of capacity limit the ability to develop and evaluate such efforts. We explored how and why conceptualizations of core skills for EBI use differ between practitioners and academics addressing cancer and other health inequities. We anchored the inquiry with a commonly used set of target skills for EBI capacity-building efforts. METHODS: The study was conducted by an interdisciplinary team of academic researchers and CBO practitioners. We gathered data through semi-structured, hour-long interviews with practitioners and academics working to address cancer and other health inequities (n = 19). After hearing a brief vignette about a CBO addressing cervical cancer inequities, participants considered a widely accepted list of skills for EBI use that included assessing needs, engaging stakeholders, and selecting, adapting, implementing, evaluating, and sustaining the EBI. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach grounded in critical and constructivist perspectives. RESULTS: Overall, the original list resonated with practitioners and academics and they added new skills to the list (cultural humility and systems change). Practitioners' responses described skills from the reference point of addressing broader community needs and context and achieving change over the long term, emphasizing aspects of health promotion in their descriptions. Academics offered a mix of perspectives, with some focused on addressing community needs (and related flexibility regarding EBIs) but more emphasized skills needed to deliver a specific EBI to achieve a focused set of health and equity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant opportunity to leverage complementary expertise and perspectives held by practitioners and academics addressing cancer inequities. However, the different frames utilized suggest proactive efforts will be required to find alignment across groups, particularly in valuing diverse contributions and identifying relevant outcomes of interest for each group. Such alignment is critical to designing effective capacity-building interventions and supporting the routine utilization of EBIs to address cancer inequities.

"We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ +-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based health communication campaigns can support tobacco control and address tobacco-related inequities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ +) populations. Community organizations focused on LGBTQ + health (e.g., nonprofits, community centers, and community health centers) can be prime channels for delivering evidence-based health communication campaigns. However, it is unclear how to balance the goals of a) designing campaigns to support broad adoption/uptake and b) adaptation addressing the needs of diverse communities and contexts. As part of an effort to support "designing for dissemination," we explored the key challenges and opportunities staff and leaders of LGBTQ + -serving community organizations encounter when adopting or adapting evidence-based health communication campaigns. METHODS: A team of researchers and advisory committee members conducted this study, many of whom have lived, research, and/or practice experience with LGBTQ + health. We interviewed 22 staff members and leaders of community organizations serving LGBTQ + populations in the US in early 2021. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The findings highlight the challenges of attempting to use health communication campaigns misaligned with the assets and needs of organizations and community members. The three major themes identified were as follows: (1) available evidence-based health communication campaigns typically do not sufficiently center LGBTQ + communities, (2) negotiation regarding campaign utilization places additional burden on practitioners who have to act as "gatekeepers," and (3) processes of using health communication campaigns often conflict with organizational efforts to engage community members in adoption and adaptation activities. CONCLUSIONS: We offer a set of considerations to support collaborative design and dissemination of health communication campaigns to organizations serving LGBTQ + communities: (1) develop campaigns with and for LGBTQ + populations, (2) attend to the broader structural forces impacting campaign recipients, (3) support in-house testing and adaptations, and (4) increase access to granular data for community organizations.

Emergency medical services professional behaviors with violent encounters: A prospective study using standardized simulated scenarios.

Introduction: To evaluate emergency medical services (EMS) professional response to escalating threats of violence during simulated patient encounters and describe differences in behaviors by characteristics. Methods: EMS professionals of a large county-based system participated in 1 of 4 standardized patient care scenarios. Each 8-minute scenario included escalated threats of violence such that EMS personnel should escape the scene for safety. Trained evaluators recorded EMS professionals' performance using standardized data elements. Outcomes included EMS personnel escape and verbal de-escalation attempts. Descriptive statistics and univariable odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are reported. Results: There were 270 EMS professionals evaluated as individual members of 2-person crews. Overall, 54% escaped the unsafe scene and 54% made an adequate de-escalation attempt; 20% did not make an adequate de-escalation attempt nor escape the unsafe scene. Paramedics demonstrated lower odds of escaping compared to emergency medical technicians (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.94), yet greater odds of adequate de-escalation (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.38-7.31). EMS professionals with more than 20 years of experience (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.79, ref:2 years or less) and those with military experience (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.81) demonstrated reduced odds of escaping. Crisis intervention team (CIT) training was associated with reduced odds of escape (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21-0.69), but increased odds of adequate de-escalation (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.19-4.04). Conclusions: Nearly half of EMS professionals did not remove themselves from a simulated patient care scenario with an escalating threat of physical violence. EMS-specific training for de-escalation as a first-line technique, recognizing imminent violence, and leaving a dangerous environment is needed.

Public Health Surveillance of Behavioral Health Emergencies through Emergency Medical Services Data.

Objective: To identify the demographic, clinical and EMS characteristics of events documented as behavioral health emergencies (BHE) by EMS. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using the 2018 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) Version 3 dataset. All events that had patient care provided with a documented impression (field diagnosis) of ICD-10 codes F01-F99 (i.e., mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders) were labeled a BHE and included. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: A total of 1,594,821 (7.3%) EMS calls had a BHE impression. The most common was mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use (42.3%). More males than females had BHEs (54.6% vs. 45.4%), and most patients were ages 18-34 (31.5%). Most BHE occurred in urban settings (89.6%). Almost half (47.9%) were dispatched with a complaint unrelated to behavioral health. Conclusion: BHEs were noted in 7.3% of NEMSIS events, and the majority were associated with substance use disorders. EMS professionals need comprehensive training on best practices for BHE. Stakeholders should have information on prevalence of BHEs to ensure proper educational standards, training practices, and resource allocation.

Methods and Implementation of the 2019 EMS Practice Analysis.

Background: The EMS Practice Analysis provides a vision of current prehospital care by defining the work performed by EMS professionals. In this manuscript, we present the National Advanced Life Support (ALS) EMS Practice Analysis for the advanced EMT (AEMT) and paramedic levels of certification. The goal of the 2019 EMS Practice Analysis is to define the work performed by EMS professionals and present a new template for future practice analyses. Methods: The project was executed in three phases. Phase 1 defined the types/frequency of EMS clinical presentations using the 2016 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) dataset. Phase 2 defined the criticality or potential for harm of these clinical presentations through a survey of a random sample of nationally certified EMS professionals and medical directors. Phase 3 defined the tasks and the associated knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) that encompass EMS care through focus groups of subject matter experts. Results: In Phase 1, the most common EMS adult impressions were traumatic injury, abdominal pain/problems, respiratory distress/arrest, behavioral/psychiatric disorder, and syncope/fainting. The most common pediatric impressions were traumatic injury, behavioral/psychiatric disorder, respiratory distress/arrest, seizure, and abdominal pain/problems. Criticality was defined in Phase 2 with the highest risk of harm for adults being airway obstruction, respiratory distress/arrest, cardiac arrest, hypovolemia/shock, allergic reaction, or stroke/CVA. In comparison, pediatric patients presenting with airway obstruction, respiratory distress/arrest, cardiac arrest, hypovolemia/shock, allergic reaction, stroke/CVA, and inhalation injury had the highest potential for harm. Finally, in Phase 3, task statements were generated for both paramedic and AEMT certification levels. A total of 425 tasks and 1,734 KSAs were defined for the paramedic level and 405 tasks and 1,636 KSAs were defined for the AEMT level. Conclusion: The 2019 ALS Practice Analysis describes prehospital practice at the AEMT and paramedic levels. This approach allows for a detailed and robust evaluation of EMS care while focusing on each task conducted at each level of certification in EMS. The data can be leveraged to inform the scope of practice, educational standards, and assist in validating the ALS levels of the certification examination.

Priorities for Prehospital Evidence-Based Guideline Development: A Modified Delphi Analysis.

Objective: Few areas of prehospital care are supported by evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). We aimed to identify gaps in clinical and operational prehospital EBGs to prioritize future EBG development and research funding. Methods: Using modified Delphi methodology, we sought consensus among experts in prehospital care and EBG development. Five rounds of surveys were administered between October 2019 and February 2020. Round 1 asked participants to list the top three gaps in prehospital clinical guidelines and top three gaps in operational guidelines that should be prioritized for guideline development and research funding. Based on responses, 3 reviewers performed thematic analysis to develop a list of prehospital EBG gaps, with participant feedback in Round 2. In Round 3, participants rated each gap's importance using a 5-point Likert scale, and participants' responses were averaged. In Round 4, participants rank-ordered 10 gaps with the highest mean scores identified in Round 3. In Round 5, participants indicated their agreement with sets of the highest ranked gaps. Results: Of 23 invited participants, 14 completed all 5 rounds. In Rounds 1 and 2, participants submitted 65 clinical and 58 operational gaps, and thematic analysis identified 23 unique clinical gaps and 28 unique operational gaps. The final prioritized list of clinical EBG gaps was: 1) airway management in adult and pediatric patients, 2) care of the pediatric patient, and 3) management of prehospital behavioral health emergencies, with 79% of participants agreeing. The final prioritized list of operational EBG gaps was: 1) define and measure the impact of EMS care on patient outcomes, 2) practitioner wellness, and 3) practitioner safety in the out-of-hospital environment, with 86% of participants agreeing. Conclusions: This modified Delphi study identifies gaps in prehospital EBGs that, if prioritized for development and research funding, would be expected to have the greatest impact on prehospital clinical care and operations.

Paramedic and EMT Program Performance on Certification Examinations Varies by Program Size and Geographic Location.

Introduction: The quality of an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) or paramedic training program is likely one factor that contributes to a candidate's success on the National Registry Cognitive Examination. However, program pass rates and their associated geographic location have not previously been evaluated. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of EMT and paramedic programs in the United States, pass rates on the National Registry Cognitive Examinations, and relationship to geography.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMT and paramedic programs' first and cumulative third attempt pass rates on the National Registry Cognitive Examination in 2015. Included were civilian EMT and paramedic programs with >5 graduates testing for certification. Descriptive statistics were calculated for program pass rates, total graduates testing, and pass rates by National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) regions.Results: We included 1,939 EMT programs (6-1,892 graduates testing/program) and 602 paramedic programs (6-689 graduates testing/program). We excluded 262 (11.9%) EMT and 51 (7.8%) paramedic programs with ≤5 graduates testing annually due to unstable estimates of program pass rates. EMT programs in the highest quartile for total number of graduates testing outperformed the lowest quartile in both first attempt (65.7% vs. 61.9%, p < 0.001) and cumulative third attempt pass rates (79.1% vs 72.7%, p < 0.001). This difference was also seen for paramedic programs on first attempt (77.3% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.001) and cumulative third attempt (91.9% vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001). EMT program pass rates for first and cumulative third attempts also varied by NASEMSO region (first: 62-68%; third: 74-78%) with the Great Lakes and West regions outperforming the other regions. Paramedic program pass rates differed by NASEMSO regions as well (first: 65-83%; third: 81-95%) with highest pass rates in the West region.Conclusions Program performance for both EMT and paramedic programs varies by total number of graduates testing and geographic location. Graduates from larger EMT and paramedic programs have higher first and cumulative third attempt pass rates compared to graduates from smaller programs. Additionally, there is variability in program pass rates across NASEMSO regions for both certification levels. Further evaluation is necessary to better understand the variability in program performance in the United States.

EMS Program Graduates Who Did Not Retest after Initial Attempt on the National Certification Exam.

Introduction: Becoming an EMS professional in most of the United States requires successful completion of the National Certification process. While multiple attempts are allowed, some candidates who are unsuccessful on their first cognitive examination attempt do not return despite personal investment. Objective: We describe the demographic and testing characteristics of EMT and paramedic candidates that do not return for a second examination attempt after an initial unsuccessful attempt on the National EMS Certification Cognitive Examination. Methods: This was a cross-sectional evaluation of nonmilitary EMT and paramedic graduates, between ages 18 and 85 years, who completed their education program in 2016, attempted the National Certification Examination, and were unsuccessful. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of retesting for EMT and paramedic graduates for age, sex, initial test length, and elapsed time from course completion to initial examination. Results: Of all EMT graduates eligible to retest (n = 22,088), 33% (n = 7,208) did not retest. Adjusted odds of retesting for EMT graduates decreased with female sex, time from course completion to initial examination, and those with minimal exam length. Adjusted odds of retesting for EMT graduates increased in 20-21 and 22-24 year olds compared to 18-19 year olds. Similarly, of all paramedic graduates eligible to retest (n = 2,755), 14% (n = 390) did not. Adjusted odds of retesting at the paramedic level decreased with time from course completion to initial examination and minimum exam length. Age and sex were not significant contributors to odds of retesting for paramedics. Conclusion: Many EMTs and paramedics who were unsuccessful on the National Certification Exam did not retest. Factors identified that impact the choice varied between EMTs and paramedics but included age, sex, length of initial examination, and time from course completion to that initial examination. These characteristics may present actionable items for EMS educational programs and stakeholders to support EMT and paramedic graduates at risk of not entering the workforce.

Associations between sleep, stress, and cardiovascular health in emergency medical services personnel.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantify the associations between sleep duration and perceived and chronic stress with ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) among emergency medical services (EMS) personnel from county-based EMS agencies. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-free EMS personnel from 4 US EMS agencies. The questionnaire consisted of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Chronic Burden Scale, and the CVH components (smoking, body mass index, physical activity, diet, blood glucose, blood pressure, cholesterol, each scored 0-2 points). The components were summed and ideal CVH considered 11-14 points. Mixed effects logistic regression models with a random intercept for agency were used to estimate the odds of ideal CVH for good sleep quality (PSQI < 5 points), recommended sleep duration (7 to < 9h), low perceived stress (PSS < 26 points), and low chronic stress (0 recent stressful events). RESULTS: We received 379 responses (response rate = 32%). There was low prevalence of good sleep quality (23%) and recommended sleep duration (25%), but 95% reported low perceived stress, and 33% had low chronic stress. Ideal CVH was reported by 30%. No significant associations between ideal CVH and sleep quality, perceived stress, or chronic stress were found. There was a nearly 2-fold increase in the odds of ideal CVH with recommended sleep duration (odds ratio: 1.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-3.10). CONCLUSION: In this sample of EMS personnel, only recommended sleep duration was associated with ideal CVH. Future longitudinal studies are needed to understand the relationship between sleep, stress, and CVD in this understudied occupational group.

Barriers to Physical Activity Among Emergency Medical Services Professionals.

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) professionals demonstrate low adherence to physical activity guidelines and experience a high prevalence of obesity and incidence of injury. The authors investigate the barriers to participating in physical activity among EMS professionals. METHODS: The EMS professionals employed by 15 North Carolina EMS agencies were surveyed with validated items. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) of not meeting physical activity guidelines for each barrier to being active, controlling for age, sex, body mass index category, race/ethnicity, certification and education level, and work hours. RESULTS: A total of 1367 EMS professionals were invited to participate, and 359 complete responses were recorded. Half of the respondents (48.2%) met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention physical activity guidelines. According to standard body mass index categories, 55.9% were obese. There were increased odds of not meeting physical activity guidelines for the following barriers: lack of energy (5.32, 3.12-9.09), lack of willpower (4.31, 2.57-7.22), lack of time (3.55, 2.12-5.94), social influence (3.02, 1.66-5.48), and lack of resources (2.14, 1.12-4.11). The barriers of fear of injury and lack of skill were not associated with meeting physical activity guidelines. CONCLUSION: Half of EMS professionals did not meet physical activity guidelines, and the majority were obese. Significant associations exist between several modifiable barriers and not meeting physical activity guidelines.

The Association of Death Notification and Related Training with Burnout among Emergency Medical Services Professionals.

INTRODUCTION: Death notification is a difficult task commonly encountered during prehospital care and may lead to burnout among EMS professionals. Lack of training could potentiate the relationship between death notification and burnout. The first objective of this study was to describe EMS professionals' experience with death notification and related training. The secondary objective was to assess the associations between death notification delivery, training, and burnout. Methods: We administered an electronic questionnaire to a random sample of nationally-certified EMS professionals. Work-related burnout was measured using the validated Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Analysis was stratified by certification level to basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). The association between the number of adult (≥18 years) patient death notifications delivered in the prior 12 months and burnout was assessed using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding variables. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to assess the adjusted association between training and burnout among those who reported delivering at least one death notification in the prior 12 months. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals are reported (95% CI). Results: We received 2,333/19,330 (12%) responses and 1,514 were included in the analysis. Most ALS respondents (77%) and one-third of BLS respondents (33%) reported at least one adult death notification in the past year. Approximately half of respondents reported receiving death notification training as part of their initial EMS education program (51% BLS; 52% ALS) and fewer reported receiving continuing education (30% BLS; 44% ALS). Delivering a greater number of death notifications was associated with increased odds of burnout. Among those who delivered at least one death notification, continuing education was associated with reduced odds of burnout. Conclusion: Many EMS professionals reported delivering at least one death notification within the past year. Yet, fewer than half reported training related to death notification during initial EMS education and even fewer reported receiving continuing education. More of those who delivered death notifications experienced burnout, while continuing education was associated with reduced odds of burnout. Future work is needed to develop and evaluate death notification training specifically for EMS professionals.

Demography of the National Emergency Medical Services Workforce: A Description of Those Providing Patient Care in the Prehospital Setting.

BACKGROUND: The emergency medical services (EMS) workforce is a key component of healthcare in the U.S. Characteristics of active EMS professionals who are treating patients in the prehospital setting is unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe the roles and settings in which nationally certified EMS professionals are providing patient care and to evaluate similarities and differences of the demographics and practice settings of the three major certification levels. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of all nationally certified EMS professionals in the U.S. that recertified between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2018 and October 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Within the recertification application, EMS professionals completed an optional demographic profile. Those who were nationally certified, functioning as a patient care provider for at least one nonmilitary EMS organization, aged 18 to 85 years, and recertified at the EMT level or higher were included. Demographic, agency and job characteristics were assessed and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: In 2017-2018, 101,363 EMS professionals recertified and 87,471 (86%) completed the profile; in 2018-2019, 106,893 EMS professionals recertified and 92,640 (87%) completed the profile. Of the 142,751 EMS professionals who met inclusion criteria, the population was primarily male (76%) and age increased by certification level. By race/ethnicity, 85% were white, 5% were Hispanic/Latino, 5% were Black/African American, 2% were American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2% were Asian and 1% were Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander.Paramedics had the highest proportion of associate degrees (EMT:16.0%; AEMT:16.6%; paramedic:28.5%); some college experience was common for all certification levels (EMT:34.7%; AEMT:37.2%; paramedic:31.6%). Most EMS professionals reported 3-7 years of experience, were working full-time (78%) and 28% were working for 2 or more agencies. Most were working for a fire department (48%) or private agency (21%) and providing 9-1-1 service (72%). No substantial differences were observed between the two recertification cycles. CONCLUSION: This is the most comprehensive study evaluating the demographics of the national EMS workforce of active patient care providers. Understanding the characteristics of EMS professionals and the settings they practice in is important for educational and training initiatives, as well as protocols and policies.

Development and Validation of Content Domains for Paramedic Prehospital Performance Assessment: A Focus Group and Delphi Method Approach.

BACKGROUND: The chaotic and complex nature of delivering patient care in the prehospital setting complicates the provision of real-time formative feedback to paramedic students. Although the use of simulations is widespread in emergency medical services (EMS) education, a high degree of variability precludes consistent performance assessment in EMS. Objectives: The objective of this study was to define and validate key domains required to evaluate paramedic prehospital performance. Methods: We conducted a two-phase study that combined focus group and Delphi methodology. Participants were purposefully selected to attain diverse panels regarding sex, race, ethnicity, professional roles, levels of education, geographical area, and experience as a paramedic and educator. In Phase I, a panel of 11 subject matter experts (SMEs) were tasked with identifying the essential domains to be evaluated in a paramedic performance assessment. In Phase II, another panel of 11 SMEs and a four-round modified Delphi method with 28 paramedic program directors were used to validate the domains identified in Phase I. Results: The first focus group identified and achieved consensus on five domains: (1) effective communication, (2) scene management, (3) patient assessment, (4) patient management, and (5) professional behavior. These domains were validated by the second focus group. The first round of the Delphi process generated 64 content domains, which were reduced to nine unique content domains via thematic analysis. These nine content domains fit well within the broader domains identified by the focus groups with one specific area, critical thinking and reasoning, being listed in two key areas based on the definitions of the focus group domains of patient assessment and patient management. Conclusion: The content domains identified in this study provide EMS educators a theoretical framework for designing the performance assessment of newly trained professionals in the prehospital setting.

Comparison of Volunteer and Paid EMS Professionals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical response is provided by volunteer emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in many parts of the United States. However, little is known about those who serve as volunteer EMS professionals, especially as their main EMS job. Our objective was to compare the characteristics of nationally-certified volunteer versus paid EMS professionals in the U.S. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS professionals who recertified their National EMS Certification between October 1, 2017-March 31, 2018 or October 1, 2018-March 31, 2019. Data were obtained from 2 cycles of the biennial National EMS Certification recertification application. We included currently working, nonmilitary EMS professionals aged 18-85 years at the emergency medical technician (EMT) or higher certification level. Volunteer was defined as receiving nominal or no compensation for the provision of EMS services at an agency as the main EMS job. Comparisons were made, accounting for the large sample size, to determine notable differences between volunteer and paid EMS professionals. Results: Of the 154,229 EMS professionals that met inclusion criteria (response rate = 86%), 13% volunteered at their main EMS job. More volunteer than paid EMS professionals were female (38% vs. 22%). There was also a significant difference in certification level between volunteer and paid (EMT: 82% vs. 46%). Three-quarters (74%) of volunteer EMS professionals reported working in rural communities compared to 30% of paid. The states with the largest proportion of volunteers to any currently working EMS professionals who recertified were Vermont (47%) and North Dakota (45%). Conclusion: Approximately 13% of the EMS workforce held a primary job in EMS as a volunteer, and these volunteer EMS professionals differed from their paid counterparts - e.g., volunteers were more likely to be women, have EMT certification, and work in rural areas. We encourage further research to understand motivations for volunteering in EMS.

Comparison of Air Force, Army, and Navy Emergency Medical Technician Candidates' Performance on the National Registry Cognitive Examination.

INTRODUCTION: Military medics function similarly to civilian emergency medical technicians (EMTs); however, they perform their emergency medical care in combat zones and military treatment facilities. Both civilian and military EMTs must take and pass the National Registry of EMT's cognitive examination to be certified as a Nationally Registered EMT; however, there is a discrepancy in requirements for obtaining and maintaining National EMT Certification between the military branches of the DoD. In our study, we aimed to compare the performance of the U.S. Air Force (USAF), U.S. Army (USA), and U.S. Navy (USN) EMT candidates on the National EMT Certification cognitive examination from 2015 to 2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the National Registry of EMT's database for the examination results of all military EMT candidates who attempted the National EMT Certification cognitive examination between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. First and cumulative third attempt pass rates and cognitive performance from mean ability estimates (MAEs) on the examination were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated and comparisons between branches with regard to passing rates and MAEs were made using chi-square tests and ANOVA, respectively, at the alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS: During the 3-year study period, a total of 3,642 USAF, 14,050 USA, and 1,187 USN candidates attempted the cognitive examination one or more times. The USA candidates demonstrated the highest first attempt pass rates (2015: 78%; 2016: 78%; and 2017: 81%) followed by the USAF candidates (2015: 58%; 2016: 62%; and 2017: 64%) and the USN candidates (2015: 41%; 2016: 56%; and 2017: 62%). The cumulative third attempt pass rates followed a similar trend (e.g., USA: 2015: 94%; 2016: 95%; and 2017: 96%). These differences by branch were statistically significant for each year (P < .001). The overall test MAE scores also differed by branch, but only the USN candidates' MAE scores differed by year. The USA candidates demonstrated the highest MAE from 2015 to 2017 (523) followed by the USAF (489) and the USN (464) candidates. The overall test MAE scores for the USN candidates improved over the study period (2015: 449; 2016: 475; and 2017: 479, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Military EMT candidates had different performances on the EMT cognitive examination between branches. The USA candidates demonstrated higher pass rates and cognitive performance on the examination compared to their counterparts from the USAF and USN from 2015 to 2017. Further work should be directed at defining the cause of the differences in military EMT candidate performance and determining the characteristics that impact these differences.

Emergency Medical Services Personnel Awareness and Training about Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: With the emergence of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), appropriate training for emergency medical services (EMS) personnel on personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential. We aimed: 1) to examine the change in proportions of EMS personnel reporting awareness of and training in PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic; and 2) to determine factors associated with reporting these outcomes.We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from October 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 from currently working, nationally certified EMS personnel (n = 15,339), assessing N95 respirator fit testing; training in air purified respirators (APR) or powered APR (PAPR) use; and training on PPE use for chemical, biological, and nuclear (CBN) threats. We used an interrupted time series analysis to determine changes in proportions of EMS personnel reporting training per week, using the date of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) initial EMS guidance (February 6, 2020) as the interruption. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to understand factors associated with each outcome.Results: We found high awareness of N95 respirators (99%) and APR/PAPR (91%), but only 61% reported N95 fit testing and 64% reported training on PPE for CBN threats in the prior 12 months. There was a significant, positive slope change after CDC guidance for N95 respirator fit testing, and significant post-interruption mean increases for fit testing (0.9%, 95% CI 0.6-1.1%), APR/PAPR training (0.3%, 95% CI 0.2-0.5%), and PPE for CBN threats training (0.6%, 95% CI 0.3-0.9%). Factors consistently associated with lower odds of awareness/training included part-time employment, providing 9-1-1 response service, working at a non-fire-based EMS agency, and working in a rural setting.Conclusions: CDC guidance on COVID-19 for EMS may have increased N95 fit testing and training, but there remain substantial gaps in training on PPE use among EMS personnel. As the pandemic continues in our communities, EMS agencies should be supported in efforts to adequately prepare their staff.

Ultrasound Use in the Prehospital Setting for Trauma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a leading cause of death in the United States. Ultrasound use in the prehospital environment has the potential to change trauma management. Although ultrasound use for prehospital trauma is increasing, the role of this modality is not clearly defined. OBJECTIVES: We examined the use of prehospital ultrasound (PHUS) for trauma patients and the use by different provider types. Specific factors of interest were if prehospital ultrasound has been shown to improve providers' ability to recognize conditions that can be managed in the prehospital setting, treat these conditions, change transport destination, or improve overall mortality rates for trauma patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, and Embase medical literature databases for articles that addressed our outcomes. Abstracts and articles were examined and studies that did not specifically evaluate ultrasound in the prehospital setting for trauma and duplicates were eliminated. Studies included in this comprehensive review were assessed for the use of ultrasound in the prehospital setting to aid in the diagnosis, treatment, and transport of trauma patients. We also conducted an analysis of bias in the included articles. Due to the large heterogeneity in the included studies, no meta-analysis could be performed. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified comprising 3,317 patients. One study evaluated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) professionals as the ultrasound operator while five studies involved mixed practitioners and ten studies involved only physicians. Diagnostic accuracy was similar amongst physicians and mixed practitioners with no studies reporting PHUS accuracy for EMS providers alone. Seven studies evaluated treatment and transport impact of PHUS though the variables measured were inconsistent and results varied by protocol and outcomes measured. There were no studies that evaluated PHUS and its impact on patient mortality. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound use in the prehospital setting for trauma is feasible and demonstrates potential. However, the evidence in the medical literature mainly consists of prospective observational studies of physicians utilizing ultrasound for trauma in a HEMS setting. Further scientific research must be undertaken to firmly establish the role of prehospital ultrasound in trauma management by all types of EMS providers.

The association of job demands and resources with burnout among emergency medical services professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Although burnout has been linked to negative workplace-level effects, prior studies have primarily focused on individuals rather than job-related characteristics. This study sought to evaluate variation in burnout between agencies and to quantify the relationship between burnout and job-related demands/resources among emergency medical services (EMS) professionals. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to all licensed, practicing EMS professionals in South Carolina. Work-related burnout was measured using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for specific job demands and resources while adjusting for confounding variables. Composite scores were used to simultaneously assess the relationship between burnout and job-related demands and resources. RESULTS: Among 1271 EMS professionals working at 248 EMS agencies, the median agency-level burnout was 35% (interquartile range [IQR]: 13% to 50%). Job-related demands, including time pressure, were associated with increased burnout. Traditional job-related resources, including pay and benefits, were associated with reduced burnout. Less tangible job resources, including autonomy, clinical performance feedback, social support, and adequate training demonstrated strong associations with reduced burnout. EMS professionals facing high job demands and low job resources demonstrated nearly a 10-fold increase in odds of burnout compared with those exposed to low demands and high resources (adjusted OR [aOR]: 9.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.39-14.10). High job resources attenuated the impact of high job demands. CONCLUSION: The proportion of EMS professionals experiencing burnout varied substantially across EMS agencies. Job resources, including those reflective of organizational culture, were associated with reduced burnout. Collectively, these findings suggest an opportunity to address burnout at the EMS agency level.

Comparing the Prevalence of Poor Sleep and Stress Metrics in Basic versus Advanced Life Support Emergency Medical Services Personnel.

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel frequently encounter occupational factors that increase the risk of poor sleep and stress. The national prevalence of poor sleep and stress in EMS personnel is unclear, especially differences between personnel at the basic (BLS) versus advanced (ALS) life support levels. The objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate the prevalence of sleep and stress metrics in EMS personnel; and (2) compare these metrics between BLS and ALS-certified personnel. Methods: This study was a survey of recertifying nationally-certified EMS personnel working in civilian settings. Respondents completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their sleep quality; workday, non-workday, and average sleep duration; sleep debt; perceived stress; and chronic stress. Survey-weighted Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) comparing BLS (emergency medical technician) to ALS (advanced emergency medical technician and paramedic) for each metric. Models were adjusted for age, sex, minority status, education level, EMS agency type, service type, EMS role, and significant interactions. Results: A total of 17,913 (response rate = 19%) responses were received with 17,522 included in the analysis. Adjusted PRs were significantly higher for ALS-certified personnel compared to BLS-certified for poor sleep quality (PR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.20-1.27) and short (<7 hours) or long (≥9 hours) workday sleep duration (PR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15-1.19). Significant interactions were found between certification level and sex (average sleep duration) or age category (sleep debt, perceived stress, and chronic stress). The highest prevalence of short or long average sleep duration was among ALS men. Sleep debt, perceived stress, and chronic stress differed by age group between certification levels with higher PRs for ALS regardless of age group. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of poor sleep and stress in EMS personnel, with evidence of the highest prevalence among ALS-certified personnel. Evidence of effect modification by age category and among BLS and ALS personnel suggests that interventions could target certain subgroups, such as older ALS personnel, to be most effective. Continued focus on sleep health and stress reduction is needed to improve the health and well-being of the EMS workforce.