Catalytic use of TiO2 nanowires in the photodegradation of Benzophenone-4 as an active ingredient in sunscreens.

Water contamination has compromised the quality of this resource during the last years with the presence of persistent organic pollutants. Because of the resistance of these compounds to degradation, several advance oxidation techniques have been proposed. In this study, we report the employment of an advance oxidation technique in the degradation of benzophenone-4 (BP-4), using TiO2 as catalyst, which was obtained following a fast-hydrothermal method. TiO2 nanowires (TiO2NWs) were fully characterized considering the morphology, elemental composition, oxidation states, vibrational modes and crystalline structure with SEM and TEM, EDS, XPS, FTIR and XRD, respectively. The photocatalytic degradation was carried out using a home-made photoreactor under slightly acidic conditions achieving an average of 90% removal. It was determined that the photocatalysis is the most probable route of degradation since the photolysis or catalysis procedures produce negligible contributions. An apparent kinetic constant of 1.29 × 10-2 min-1 was determined, according to a pseudo-first order reaction.

Genetic ancestry and prostate cancer susceptibility SNPs in Puerto Rican and African American men.

BACKGROUND: The Puerto Rican (PR) population is a racially admixed population that has a high prostate cancer (PCa) mortality rate. We hypothesized in this pilot study that West African Ancestry (WAA) was associated with PCa in this heterogeneous (PR) population. METHODS: A case/case and case/control study was performed. Controls, 207 African American (AA) and 133 PR were defined as men with no PCa, a serum PSA < 2.5 ng/mL and a negative rectal examination. Cases were patients with pathological specimens from radical prostatectomies (RP) (291 PR and 200 AA). DNA was extracted from whole blood of controls and from paraffin embedded normal seminal vesicle from the RPs. We assessed the association of PCa and aggressiveness with genetic ancestry using an ancestry informative marker panel (AIMs) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the association of PCa and aggressiveness with 15 previously PCa associated SNPs using Chi square test. Gleason Score (GS) and tumor stage (TS) were used to define low risk (GS ≤ 7[3 + 4]), TS ≤ pT2) and high risk (GS≥ 7[4 + 3], TS > pT2) PCa. Statistical analyses were done using SAS. RESULTS: No difference in overall percent WAA was found between PR cases and controls. Among PR or AA cases WAA was not associated with disease severity based upon risk group, Gleason score or stage. Among AA controls WAA was significantly higher than in cases. The SNP rs7824364 (chromosome 8q24) PCa risk allele was significantly increased among cases versus controls for both AA (P < 0.0001) and PR (P = 0.0001) men. PR men with ≥1 risk allele exhibited a higher percent of WAA (39% vs 29%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: The SNP rs7824364, a local marker of WAA in the 8q24 region was associated with PCa among both AA and PR men and with increased WAA among PR men. This novel relationship of PCA risk loci, WAA with PCa and its phenotype among PR men deserves further study.