Eligibility of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the Colombian heart failure registry (RECOLFACA).

Background: The value of Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitor) therapy in individuals with heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) was unknown until the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. We aimed to assess the proportion of patients with HFpEF that are eligible for empagliflozin therapy within the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA). Methods: RECOLFACA enrolled adult patients with a HF diagnosis during 2017-2019 from 60 medical centers in Colombia. Criteria of the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial were used to recruit participants. The main outcome was individual eligibility with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) criteria, while the secondary outcome was eligibility without NT-proBNP data. Results: RECOLFACA had 799 patients with HFpEF (mean age70.7 ± 13.5; 50.7 % males). According to the major selection criteria of the EMPEROR Preserved Trial, 73.7 % patients would be eligible for empagliflozin therapy initiation when considering the NT-proBNP threshold. The NT-proBNP threshold represented the main determinant of ineligibility in patients with this biomarker measure (13.6 %; n = 16). In patients without NT-proBNP data, the main reasons for exclusion were the diagnosis of symptomatic hypotension or a systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg (7.5 %), having an eGFR < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 (4.3 %), and haemoglobin < 9 g/dl (3.1 %). Excluding NT-proBNP criteria increased empagliflozin eligibility to 80.6 %. Conclusion: Most patients with HFpEF from RECOLFACA are potential candidates for empagliflozin therapy initiation according to the EMPEROR-Preserved trial criteria. These findings favor the utilization of SGLT-2 inhibitor medications in daily medical practice, which may further decrease morbidity and mortality in HF patients, regardless of their EF classification.

Characterization of Patients With Heart Failure of Chagas Etiology in Colombia: An Analysis Based on the Colombian Registry of Heart Failure (RECOLFACA).

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM) represents a relevant origin of Heart Failure (HF) in countries where the disease is endemic. CCM exhibits distinct myocardial involvement and is associated with a poorer prognosis compared to different HF etiologies. The aim is to explain the features and prognosis of individuals with HF resultant to CCM registered in the Colombian Registry of Heart Failure (RECOLFACA). RECOLFACA registry enrolled 2528 adult patients with HF. A comparison was made between patients diagnosed with CCM and those diagnosed with other etiologies of HF. Eighty-eight patients (3.5%) present CCM diagnosis. The individuals diagnosed with both HF and CCM were notably younger in age, had less comorbidities, poorer functional class, and significantly inferior ejection fraction. Finally, the presence of CCM diagnosis was linked to a substantially elevated mortality risk throughout the follow-up period (HR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.01-4.00) according to a multivariate model adjusted. CCM represents an important etiology of HF in Colombia, drawing attention to a distinct clinical profile and a higher risk of mortality compared to other HF etiologies.

Terapia de resincronización cardíaca con o sin cardiodesfibrilador versus terapia con desfibrilador automático, Pereira (Colombia): un estudio de cohorte / Terapia de ressincronização cardíaca com ou sem cardiodesfibrilador versus terapia desfibrilador automático, Pereira (Colômbia): Um estudo de coorte / Cardiac resyncronization therapy with or without cardioverter-defibrillator versus defibrillator therapy alone, Pereira (Colombia): a cohort study

Comparar la supervivencia de pacientes con resincronizador cardíaco con o sin desfibrilador con la de pacientes con cardiodesfibrilador. Materiales y métodos: cohorte retrospectiva cuyo desenlace primario fue la mortalidad de origen cardíaco; la exposición fueron las terapias electrofisiológicas y la información se obtuvo de las historias clínicas y de otros registros médicos. Resultados: se estudiaron 70 pacientes de edad avanzada con dispositivos funcionales. El 82 % recibieron tratamiento farmacológico optimizado. No se encontró asociación significativa entre la probabilidad de supervivencia y la terapia de resincronización cardíaca con o sin cardiodesfibrilador versus la terapia con cardiodesfibrilador (log rank test p = 0,54), pero sí un mayor tiempo de supervivencia en los primeros (ANOVA p = 0,0012). La tasa de peligro fue 0,017 para el día 371 y del 0,15 para el día 2169. Durante el período de observación se presentaron 14 muertes, tres de ellas atribuibles a etiología no cardíaca. Conclusión: se observó que la terapia con resincronizador cardíaco se asoció de forma significativa con un mayor tiempo supervivencia...

To evaluate survival in patients with cardiac resynchronization with or without cardioverterdefibrillatorversus patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator alone. Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort, the primary end point was death from cardiac causes, the exposure was electrophysiological therapies, and the information sources were medical files and other records. Results: 70 elderly patients with functional devices; 82 % of them received optimized medical therapy. Nosignificant association was found between survival of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy withor without defibrillator and cardioverter-defibrillator therapy alone (log rank test, p = 0.54), but the formerhad a longer survival time (ANOVA p = 0.0012). The hazard ratio was 0.017 for day 371 and 0.15 for day 169. Fourteen deaths occurred during the observation period, three of them from non-cardiac causes. Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with significantly longer survival time...

Comparar a sobrevivência de pacientes com ressincronizador cardíaco com ou sem desfibrilador em pacientes com desfibriladores. Materiais e métodos: corte retrospectivo de cujo principal resultado primário foi a mortalidade de origem cardíaca; a exposição foram as terapias e eletrofisiológicos e a informação foi obtida a partir da história clínica e outros registros médicos. Resultados: Foram estudados 70 pacientes idosos com dispositivos funcionais. 82 % receberam tratamento farmacológico otimizado. Não foi encontrado associação significativa entre a probabilidade de sobrevivencia e terapia de ressincronização cardíaca com ou sem cardiodesfibrilador versus a terapia cardiodesfibrilador (log rank test, p = 0,54 ), mas há um maior tempo de sobrevivência no primeiro (ANOVA, p = 0,0012 ). A taxa de risco foi 0,017 para o dia 371 e 0,15 para o dia 2169. Durante o período de observação, apresentaram 14 mortes, três deles atribuíveis a etiologia não cardíaca. Conclusão: constatou-se que a terapia com ressincronizador cardíaco foi significativamente asociado com um maior tempo de sobrevivência...