Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 173: 87-91, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574908

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of preliminary testicular core extraction (TCE) as a tool for determining whether to pursue clinic testicular extraction (cTESE) versus microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to minimize both financial burden and procedural complexity. METHODS: All men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) from 2018 to 2022 who underwent clinic TCE were analyzed. Patients who were found to have sperm on initial TCE were recommended cTESE. Patients who did not have sperm on initial TCE were recommended for mTESE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TCE were calculated. Cost reductions were determined based on this institution's fees. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to determine statistical significance between the results of the TCE sperm present and sperm absent groups. RESULTS: Of the 82 NOA patients undergoing TCE, 51 (62.2%) core biopsies were positive for sperm and 31 (37.8%) were negative for sperm. The SRR for 35 men who then underwent cTESE following sperm seen on TCE was 97.1%. The SRR for 8 men who underwent mTESE after no sperm was found on TCE was 75%. The positive predictive value of TCE for successful TESE result is 94.4% for men with NOA. Treatment success rate of TCE and cTESE was 79.1% with a cost reduction of 59.4%. CONCLUSION: TCE is a prognostic tool to guide decision making between cTESE and mTESE and maximize sperm retrieval rate while mitigating financial burden and operative complexity. TCE is important to identify ideal candidates for both procedures to maximize efficacy and safety amongst men with NOA.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Male , Humans , Azoospermia/surgery , Sperm Retrieval , Retrospective Studies , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology
3.
Transl Androl Urol ; 9(Suppl 2): S149-S159, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32257855

ABSTRACT

Male hypogonadism is an increasingly prevalent clinical condition that affects patients' quality of life and overall health. Obesity and metabolic syndrome can both cause and result from hypogonadism. Although testosterone remains the gold standard for hypogonadism management, its benefits are not always conserved across different populations, especially with regards to changes in body composition. Partially in response to this, growth hormone secretagogues (GHS) have emerged as a potential novel adjunctive therapy for some of the symptoms of hypogonadism, although current data on their clinical efficacy largely remain lacking. The present review examines the existing literature on the use of GHS and explores their potential complementary role in the management of hypogonadal and eugonadal males with metabolic syndrome or subclinical hypogonadism (SH). The GHS that will be discussed include sermorelin, growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRP)-2, GHRP-6, ibutamoren, and ipamorelin. All are potent GH and IGF-1 stimulators that can significantly improve body composition while ameliorating specific hypogonadal symptoms including fat gain and muscular atrophy. However, a paucity of data examining the clinical effects of these compounds currently limits our understanding of GHS' role in the treatment of men with hypogonadism, but does open opportunities for future investigation.

4.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(3): 431-442, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139335

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the inability to attain or sustain an erection for sexual intercourse. Affected men endorse difficulties with intimacy and feelings of guilt and shame. Although medical treatments are available, patients are reluctant to discuss ED with physicians and often use dietary supplements to attempt to treat their ED. As such, there is a need to better understand the effects of ingredients used in nutraceuticals for ED treatment. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the literature on the efficacy and safety of the most common ingredients used in ED supplements. METHODS: 10 of the most common ingredients in ED supplements were reviewed using PubMed-indexed literature to assess their efficacy and safety in treating ED. Key findings were summarized to include historical use, active ingredients, prior animal studies, human studies, and toxicity. RESULTS: Nutraceuticals used in ED treatment include a variety of ingredients. Although L-arginine is a safe supplement with clinical data supporting improved erectile function, limited data exist on the efficacy of other ingredients in the treatment of ED. CONCLUSION: Despite the growing use of supplements for treatment of sexual dysfunction, ED supplements remain poorly studied, with limited data demonstrating efficacy of individual ingredients. Further study is required to definitively determine the efficacy of nutraceuticals in ED treatment. Srivatsav A, Balasubramanian A, Pathak UI, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Common Ingredients in Aphrodisiacs Used for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review. J Sex Med 2020;8:431-442.


Subject(s)
Aphrodisiacs/therapeutic use , Erectile Dysfunction/drug therapy , Animals , Aphrodisiacs/adverse effects , Aphrodisiacs/chemistry , Arginine/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Erectile Dysfunction/diet therapy , Humans , Male , Phytotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...