ABSTRACT
AIM: To identify risk factors associated with the development of DMO among patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes managed in a primary care setting in the UK. METHODS: A case-control study nested in a cohort of incident Type 2 diabetes identified in The Health Improvement Network database from 2000-2007. Cases were people with DMO (N=211) and controls were a DMO-free sample (N=2194). No age restrictions were applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95%CIs were estimated (OR; 95%CI). RESULTS: DMO increased with high alcohol use (2.88; 1.49-5.55), cataracts (4.10; 2.73-6.15), HbA1c ≥7% (1.58; 1.08-2.32), systolic blood pressure ≥160mm Hg (2.03; 1.17-3.53), total cholesterol ≥5mmol/L (1.66; 1.15-2.39), LDL ≥3mmol/L (1.73; 1.14-2.61), and microalbuminuria (1.78; 1.16-2.73). Diuretic drugs were associated with a reduced risk of DMO (0.68; 0.47-0.99), as did smoking (0.47; 0.28-0.77), overweight (0.53; 0.30-0.96) or obesity (0.52; 0.30-0.91) at diabetes diagnosis, and high triglyceride levels (0.51; 0.35-0.74). Patients treated with anti-diabetic drugs showed higher risk of DMO than non-treated patients, particularly those with sulphonylureas (3.40; 2.42-4.78), insulin (3.21; 1.92-5.36) or glitazones (1.88; 1.17-3.04). CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes managed in primary care, multiple factors associated with DMO were identified, such as cataracts, microalbuminuria and high levels of HbA1c, systolic BP, total cholesterol, and LDL. Diuretic drugs were associated with a reduced risk of DMO. Treated diabetes, particularly with sulphonylureas, insulin or glitazones showed highest risk of DMO. The inverse association between smoking, obesity, and triglycerides and DMO deserves further research.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Macular Edema/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Electronic Health Records , Female , Health Status , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Logistic Models , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Breast cancer screening has proved to be efficacious only in clinical trials or structured programs. However, little is known of its effectiveness as a regular practice. This study is an assessment of breast cancer screening in regular practice in a Spanish area of 350,000 inhabitants through analysis of existing sources of information. It is evident that this screening is insufficient, inefficient, very variable, nonspecific, and probably ineffective, although there is insufficient information to prove it. The immediate implementation of a well-structured and accredited screening program is essential to overcome the current limitations.
