Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oncogene ; 41(50): 5347-5360, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36344675

ABSTRACT

ARID1a (BAF250), a component of human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes, is frequently mutated across numerous cancers, and its loss of function has been putatively linked to glucocorticoid resistance. Here, we interrogate the impact of siRNA knockdown of ARID1a compared to a functional interference approach in the HeLa human cervical cancer cell line. We report that ARID1a knockdown resulted in a significant global decrease in chromatin accessibility in ATAC-Seq analysis, as well as affecting a subset of genome-wide GR binding sites determined by analyzing GR ChIP-Seq data. Interestingly, the specific effects on gene expression were limited to a relatively small subset of glucocorticoid-regulated genes, notably those involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA repair. The vast majority of glucocorticoid-regulated genes were largely unaffected by ARID1a knockdown or functional interference, consistent with a more specific role for ARID1a in glucocorticoid function than previously speculated. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we have identified a chromatin-associated protein complex comprising GR, ARID1a, and several DNA damage repair proteins including P53 binding protein 1 (P53BP1), Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 (PARP1), DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1), DNA mismatch repair protein MSH6 and splicing factor proline and glutamine-rich protein (SFPQ), as well as the histone acetyltransferase KAT7, an epigenetic regulator of steroid-dependent transcription, DNA damage repair and cell cycle regulation. Not only was this protein complex ablated with both ARID1a knockdown and functional interference, but spontaneously arising DNA damage was also found to accumulate in a manner consistent with impaired DNA damage repair mechanisms. Recovery from dexamethasone-dependent cell cycle arrest was also significantly impaired. Taken together, our data demonstrate that although glucocorticoids can still promote cell cycle arrest in the absence of ARID1a, the purpose of this arrest to allow time for DNA damage repair is hindered.


Subject(s)
DNA Repair , Nuclear Proteins , Receptors, Glucocorticoid , Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1 , Humans , Cell Cycle , Cell Cycle Checkpoints , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin/genetics , DNA Damage , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Histone Acetyltransferases/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1/metabolism
2.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227520, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923266

ABSTRACT

Glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) are believed to classically bind DNA as homodimers or MR-GR heterodimers to influence gene regulation in response to pulsatile basal or stress-evoked glucocorticoid secretion. Pulsed corticosterone presentation reveals MR and GR co-occupy DNA only at the peaks of glucocorticoid oscillations, allowing interaction. GR DNA occupancy was pulsatile, while MR DNA occupancy was prolonged through the inter-pulse interval. In mouse mammary 3617 cells MR-GR interacted in the nucleus and at a chromatin-associated DNA binding site. Interactions occurred irrespective of ligand type and receptors formed complexes of higher order than heterodimers. We also detected MR-GR interactions ex-vivo in rat hippocampus. An expanded range of MR-GR interactions predicts structural allostery allowing a variety of transcriptional outcomes and is applicable to the multiple tissue types that co-express both receptors in the same cells whether activated by the same or different hormones.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid/metabolism , Allosteric Regulation , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Binding Sites , Cell Line , Chromatin/metabolism , Corticosterone/pharmacology , DNA/chemistry , Dimerization , Hippocampus/metabolism , Male , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs/drug effects , Protein Structure, Quaternary , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/chemistry , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid/chemistry , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid/genetics , Sequence Alignment , Ultradian Rhythm
3.
Endocrinology ; 160(5): 1044-1056, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980716

ABSTRACT

Mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors (MRs and GRs) constitute a functionally important dual receptor system detecting and transmitting circulating corticosteroid signals. High expression of MRs and GRs occurs in the same cells in the limbic system, the primary site of glucocorticoid action on cognition, behavior, and mood; however, modes of interaction between the receptors are poorly characterized. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation with nucleotide resolution using exonuclease digestion, unique barcode, and single ligation (ChIP-nexus) for high-resolution genome-wide characterization of MR and GR DNA binding profiles in neuroblastoma cells and demonstrate recruitment to highly similar DNA binding sites. Expressed MR or GR showed differential regulation of endogenous gene targets, including Syt2 and Ddc, whereas coexpression produced augmented transcriptional responses even when MRs were unable to bind DNA (MR-XDBD). ChIP confirmed that MR-XDBD could be tethered to chromatin by GR. Our data demonstrate that MR can interact at individual genomic DNA sites in multiple modes and suggest a role for MR in increasing the transcriptional response to glucocorticoids.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Animals , Base Sequence , Binding Sites/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , DNA/genetics , DNA/metabolism , Mice , Protein Binding , RNA Interference , Rats , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Mineralocorticoid/genetics , Response Elements/genetics
4.
Endocrinology ; 158(5): 1486-1501, 2017 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28200020

ABSTRACT

Glucocorticoids regulate hippocampal function in part by modulating gene expression through the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR binding is highly cell type specific, directed to accessible chromatin regions established during tissue differentiation. Distinct classes of GR binding sites are dependent on the activity of additional signal-activated transcription factors that prime chromatin toward context-specific organization. We hypothesized a stress context dependency for GR binding in hippocampus as a consequence of rapidly induced stress mediators priming chromatin accessibility. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing to interrogate GR binding, we found no effect of restraint stress context on GR binding, although analysis of sequences underlying GR binding sites revealed mechanistic detail for hippocampal GR function. We note enrichment of GR binding sites proximal to genes linked to structural and organizational roles, an absence of major tethering partners for GRs, and little or no evidence for binding at negative glucocorticoid response elements. A basic helix-loop-helix motif closely resembling a NeuroD1 or Olig2 binding site was found underlying a subset of GR binding sites and is proposed as a candidate lineage-determining transcription factor directing hippocampal chromatin access for GRs. Of our GR binding sites, 54% additionally contained half-sites for nuclear factor (NF)-1 that we propose as a collaborative or general transcription factor involved in hippocampal GR function. Our findings imply a dose-dependent and context-independent action of GRs in the hippocampus. Alterations in the expression or activity of NF-1/basic helix-loop-helix factors may play an as yet undetermined role in glucocorticoid-related disease susceptibility and outcome by altering GR access to hippocampal binding sites.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs , Hippocampus/metabolism , NFI Transcription Factors/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Binding Sites , Chromatin/metabolism , Disease Susceptibility , Gene Expression Regulation , Genome , Immunoprecipitation , Male , Protein Binding , Rats , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/chemistry , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Sequence Analysis , Stress, Physiological
5.
J Biol Chem ; 283(39): 26612-23, 2008 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18650424

ABSTRACT

Although many stimuli activate extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), the kinetics and compartmentalization of ERK1/2 signals are stimulus-dependent and dictate physiological consequences. ERKs can be inactivated by dual specificity phosphatases (DUSPs), notably the MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) and atypical DUSPs, that can both dephosphorylate and scaffold ERK1/2. Using a cell imaging model (based on knockdown of endogenous ERKs and add-back of wild-type or mutated ERK2-GFP reporters), we explored possible effects of DUSPs on responses to transient or sustained ERK2 activators (epidermal growth factor and phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate, respectively). For both stimuli, a D319N mutation (which impairs DUSP binding) increased ERK2 activity and reduced nuclear accumulation. These stimuli also increased mRNA levels for eight DUSPs. In a short inhibitory RNA screen, 12 of 16 DUSPs influenced ERK2 responses. These effects were evident among nuclear inducible MKP, cytoplasmic ERK MKP, JNK/p38 MKP, and atypical DUSP subtypes and, with the exception of the nuclear inducible MKPs, were paralleled by corresponding changes in Egr-1 luciferase activation. Simultaneous removal of all JNK/p38 MKPs or nuclear inducible MKPs revealed them as positive and negative regulators of ERK2 signaling, respectively. The effects of JNK/p38 MKP short inhibitory RNAs were not dependent on protein neosynthesis but were reversed in the presence of JNK and p38 kinase inhibitors, indicating DUSP-mediated cross-talk between MAPK pathways. Overall, our data reveal that a large number of DUSPs influence ERK2 signaling. Together with the known tissue-specific expression of DUSPs and the importance of ERK1/2 in cell regulation, our data support the potential value of DUSPs as targets for drug therapy.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/enzymology , Dual-Specificity Phosphatases/metabolism , MAP Kinase Signaling System/physiology , Models, Biological , Amino Acid Substitution , Dual-Specificity Phosphatases/genetics , Enzyme Activators/pharmacology , HeLa Cells , Humans , Kinetics , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1 , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3/metabolism , Mutation, Missense , Phosphorylation/drug effects
6.
J Biol Chem ; 283(10): 6241-52, 2008 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18178562

ABSTRACT

Spatiotemporal aspects of ERK activation are stimulus-specific and dictate cellular consequences. They are dependent upon dual specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) that bind ERK via docking domains and can both inactivate and anchor ERK in cellular compartments. Using high throughput fluorescence microscopy in combination with a system where endogenous ERKs are removed and replaced with wild-type or mutated ERK2-green fluorescent protein (GFP), we show that ERK2 activation responses to epidermal growth factor (EGF) and protein kinase C (PKC) are transient and sustained, respectively. PKC-mediated ERK2 activation is associated with prolonged nuclear localization in the dephosphorylated form, whereas EGF-stimulated ERK2 activation mediates only transient nuclear accumulation. By using short inhibitory RNAs to nuclear inducible DUSP1, -2, or -4 (alone or in combination), we demonstrate that all three of these enzymes contribute to the dephosphorylation of PKC (but not EGF)-activated ERK2 in the nucleus but that they have opposing effects on localization. DUSP2 and -4 inactivate and anchor ERK2, whereas DUSP1 dephosphorylates ERK in the nucleus but allows its traffic back to the cytoplasm. Overexpression of DUSP1, -2, or -4 prevented ERK2 activation, but only DUSP2 and -4 caused ERK2-GFP nuclear accumulation or could be immunoprecipitated with ERK2. Furthermore, protein synthesis inhibition or replacement of wild-type ERK2-GFP with docking domain mutants selectively increased PKC effects on ERK activity and altered ERK2-GFP localization. These mutations also impaired the ability of ERK2-GFP to bind DUSP2 and -4. Together, our data reveal a novel, stimulus-specific, and phosphatase-specific mechanism of ERK2 regulation in the nucleus by DUSP1, -2, and -4.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/enzymology , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , MAP Kinase Signaling System/physiology , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/metabolism , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatases/metabolism , Protein Kinase C/metabolism , Active Transport, Cell Nucleus/physiology , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Cytoplasm/enzymology , Cytoplasm/genetics , Enzyme Activation/physiology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , HeLa Cells , Humans , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatases/genetics , Mutation , Phosphorylation , Protein Kinase C/genetics , Protein Structure, Tertiary/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...