The Persistence of Nystatin Use for Dermatophyte Infections.

BACKGROUND: Despite the limited use of nystatin for tinea infections, physicians may continue to use it. METHODS: We assessed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for all to determine the extent of topical nystatin use in tinea infections. RESULTS: Topical nystatin was used at 4.3% (2.1%, 6.0%) of all tinea infection visits. It was not used at visits with dermatologists and was most common among family medicine physicians (P=.02). DISCUSSION: Physicians are continuing to use nystatin for the treatment of tinea infections. Dermatologists have discontinued this treatment regimen, whereas other specialties have an opportunity to further improve their knowledge in this regard. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):e49-e50.     doi:10.36849/JDD.5606e.

Workforce requirements for keratinous cysts: clinicians expend 1200 full-time effort years annually.

Keratinous cysts are amongst the 10 most common dermatologic ambulatory diagnoses. Thus, we aimed to estimate the time and cost spent annually on management of keratinous cysts. We conducted a cross-sectional study using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2007 and 2018 (most recent years available). Conservatively, $2.1 billion per year was spent on healthcare for keratinous cysts. On average, the full-time work of 1200 (840-1800) physicians and non-physician providers are required to manage keratinous cysts yearly in the outpatient and emergency departments.We used Medicare reimbursement rates for the cost analysis which provides a conservative estimate of the total cost. Keratinous cysts impose a significant time and cost burden on the healthcare system. Treating inflamed, draining, or painful keratinous cysts or ones that occur in undesirable locations such as the face are likely of high-value due to the quality of life impact. Managing asymptomatic keratinous cysts may be of lower value. Given this burden, clinicians should continue to evaluate the value they are providing to the patient when managing keratinous cysts.

Women of Childbearing Age With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Frequently Prescribed Medications With Pregnancy Risk.

Copy: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) disproportionately affects women of childbearing age. As almost half of pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, dermatologists must give special consideration to medication safety when managing patients in this population. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional analysis utilizing the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2007 to 2018 (most recent years available) in order to characterize the treatment modalities most commonly being used for treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa in women of childbearing age. RESULTS: There were 43.8 million estimated total visits for females ages 15 to 44 with HS. Women of childbearing age with HS were most commonly seen by general and family practice (28.6%), general surgery (26.9%), and dermatologists (24.6%). Obstetricians saw 1.84% of all visits. Oral clindamycin was the most commonly prescribed drug, followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate, minocycline, naproxen, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Adalimumab was prescribed at an estimated 10.3 thousand visits (0.211%). At visits in which medication from the 30 most common therapies was prescribed, 31% of visits included a medication that was pregnancy category C or above. DISCUSSION: Nearly a third of women of childbearing age with HS are receiving medications considered teratogenic. As many female patients feel that their physicians are not counseling them regarding the impact of HS therapy on childbearing, the results of this study serve as a reminder to dermatologists and non-dermatologists managing skin disease to continue to facilitate conversations about potential pregnancy risk when prescribing medications with pregnancy risk. Peck G, Fleischer AB Jr. Women of childbearing age with hidradenitis suppurativa frequently prescribed medications with pregnancy risk. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(7):706-709. doi:10.36849/JDD.6818.