Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) Scores > 55 at 6 Months Postoperative Predict Ability to Achieve Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State at Minimum 1 Year Postoperative Following Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Grade IV Chondral Defects About the Patellofemoral Joint.

PURPOSE: The primary aim is to evaluate the relationship between MOCART scores and patient satisfaction, as evaluated by achievement of (1) the Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) and (2) the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Quality of Life (KOOS QoL), for patients undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for focal Grade IV patellofemoral chondral defects. The secondary aim is to determine the threshold MOCART score which predicts the ability to meet the PASS and the MCID for KOOS QoL. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACI for grade IV patellofemoral chondral defects by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2020 were identified by search of the EMR. To determine PASS status, patients were asked, "Do you consider your current level of symptoms to be acceptable?" KOOS QoL scores were also collected. Patients with 6-month postoperative knee MRI, PASS scores, and minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. Paired t tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to evaluate the relationship between MOCART scores and (1) PASS achievement and (2) achievement of the MCID for KOOS QoL (12.8). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included, with a median age of 35.1 years [IQR: 24.6, 37.1], and BMI of 24.0 kg/m2 [IQR: 21.5, 28.1]. The median time to postoperative MRI was 6.7 months [IQR: 5.8, 7.9], and average follow-up time was 3.7 ± 1.2 years. Twenty-five patients (74%) achieved PASS, and 18 patients (out of 27 who had postop KOOS QoL Scores, 67%) achieved the MCID for KOOS QoL. Patients who achieved PASS had higher average MOCART scores (61.8 ± 16.0) than those who did not achieve PASS (45.0 ± 12.8, p=0.011), whereas patients who achieved the MCID for KOOS QoL did not have higher MOCART scores than those who did not achieve the MCID (61.9 ± 18.3 versus 53.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.25). There was no relationship between age, sex, lesion size, and lesion location and ability to achieve PASS or MCID for KOOS QoL (p>0.05). A threshold MOCART value of 55 was associated with the highest AUC on ROC analysis for likelihood of achieving PASS (0.778) and MCID for KOOS QoL (0.667). CONCLUSION: Higher MOCART scores are associated with an increased likelihood of achieving PASS following patellofemoral ACI. Moreover, MOCART scores > 55 predict the ability to achieve PASS and the MCID for KOOS QoL following patellofemoral ACI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Incidence of Complications After Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy With Distalization.

BACKGROUND: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a well-established surgical treatment option for patellofemoral instability and pain. TTO with distalization (TTO-D) is indicated for patients with patellofemoral instability, patellar malalignment, and patella alta. The current literature demonstrates several complications that may be associated with TTO, with reportedly higher rates of complications associated with TTO-D. PURPOSE: To analyze and compare complication rates after TTO without distalization (TTO-ND) and TTO-D and assess risk factors associated with complications. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients who underwent TTO with or without distalization by a single surgeon between September 2014 and May 2023 with a minimum of 6 months of clinical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patient factors, surgical indications, perioperative data, and complications were collected via a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Concomitant procedures were categorized as intra-articular, extra-articular, and osteotomies. RESULTS: A total of 251 TTOs (117 TTO-D, 134 TTO-ND) were included in the study group. Postoperative complications were observed in 15 operations (6%), with arthrofibrosis as the most common complication (10 operations [4%]). TTO-D and TTO-ND had similar rates of complication (5% vs 7%; P = .793). Clinical nonunion was observed in 3 operations (3%) in the TTO-D cohort and 1 operation (1%) in the TTO-ND cohort. In the TTO-D cohort, concomitant intra-articular procedures were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of complications in a univariate model. In the TTO-ND cohort, an increased tourniquet time was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of complications in a univariate model. For all TTOs as well as the TTO-D and TTO-ND cohorts, there were no significant associations between patient or surgical variables in a multivariate model. CONCLUSION: TTO with and without distalization is a safe procedure with low rates of complication. TTO-D was not associated with a higher rate of complications compared with TTO-ND. There was no association between complications and surgical variables for TTO procedures.

Increased Host Bone Marrow Edema on 6-Month MRI Is a Risk Factor for Osteochondral Allograft Failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the presence of host bone marrow edema (BME) surrounding osteochondral allograft (OCA) plugs on routine 6-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to determine whether such BME is correlated with subsequent failure. METHODS: The present study was approved under our institutional review board-approved database (#2020-2123). We included patients who underwent cartilage repair with OCA for focal chondral and osteochondral defects of the distal femur by 2 senior surgeons between January 2016 and May 2021 with minimum 2-year follow-up. OCA is frequently performed with concomitant procedures, and therefore ligament reconstruction, meniscal surgery, and osteotomy were not exclusion criteria. Failure was defined as (1) poor clinical outcome with graft collapse on follow-up MRI or second-look arthroscopy, (2) primary OCA removal or revision, or (3) conversion to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty. Routine MRI scans were performed at 6 ± 2 months postoperatively. All postoperative MRI scans were reviewed from our imaging record by 2 blinded fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were divided for analyses into 2 groups: BME ≥10 cm3 versus BME <10 cm3. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients eligible for the study, 56 patients (30 female, mean age 31.69 ± 11.34 years) had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Nonfailure cases had a mean clinical follow-up of 3.13 ± 0.93 years. The mean time from surgery to failure in our cohort was 1.67 ± 0.91 years. There were 12 (21.4%) patients with BME ≥10 cm³ and 44 (78.6%) patients with BME <10 cm³. No statistically significant differences were found between groups when compared for sex, age, body mass index, OCA size, time to MRI, mean follow-up, number of plugs, graft location, diagnosis, previous surgeries, or concomitant procedures. All OCA failures of the study cohort were in the BME ≥10 cm³ group, representing 50% of this group (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test demonstrated significant difference in survival distributions between groups (P < .001). Patients who ultimately failed had a mean BME volume of 18.49 ± 5.82 cm3, while the nonfailure group had a mean volume of 4.66 ± 4.97 cm3 (P < .001). Cutoff values around 10 cm³ in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 100% sensitivity and close to 90% specificity for OCA failure diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Host BME with a volume greater than 10 cm³ on 6-month postoperative MRI is predictive of an increased subsequent failure rate after OCA transplantation with a failure rate of 50%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.

Multi-Surface Cartilage Defects about the Knee Treated with Cartilage Restoration Procedures Show Good Outcomes and Survivorship at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes, survivorship, and complications following multi-surface cartilage procedures at minimum 2-year follow-up. DESIGN: Patients with either (1) single-surface osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) with third-generation matrix-induced autologous cultured chondrocyte implantation (MACI) or particulated juvenile cartilage implantation (DeNovo), or (2) multiple-surface OCAT ± associated MACI/DeNovo procedures for grade IV chondral or osteochondral defects about the knee with minimum 2-year follow-up were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, were obtained preoperatively and at minimum 2 years postoperatively. The percentage of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM was reported. Failure was defined as revision OCAT, conversion to patellofemoral/total/unicompartmental joint arthroplasty, or Arthrosurface HemiCAP placement. RESULTS: Of 257 patients identified, 35 were included. There was a significant increase in IKDC, KOOS-pain, KOOS-symptom, KOOS-sport, and KOOS-quality of life scores from preoperative to postoperative evaluation (P < 0.03 for all). More than 50% of patients met the MCID for each PROM. There were 2 failures, 1 of the patella and 1 of the medial femoral condyle, at 39.7 and 38.6 months postoperatively, respectively. DISCUSSION: Multi-surface cartilage procedures are a safe, efficacious treatment option for multifocal cartilage defects about the knee at short-term follow-up.

Predilection of Patellofemoral Cartilage Lesions in Patients with Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to compare the presence and severity of patellofemoral osteoarthritis between patients with root lesions and non-root lesions. DESIGN: A total of 102 patients were included in this study (51 root lesions and 51 non-root lesions). The root lesion cohort was matched to a non-root lesion cohort based on sex, body mass index, and age at the time of surgery. Radiographic evaluation with modified Outerbridge scoring of MRI of the knee was performed to determine the severity of degeneration of the knee joint preoperatively. Mann-Whitney and Independent t tests were used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The root lesion group had statistically greater Outerbridge patella scores (M = 2.45 ± 1.12) and trochlear scores (M = 2.27 ± 1.37) than the non-root lesion patients (M = 1.78 ± 1.30, P = 0.006, and M = 1.55 ± 1.40, P = 0.010, respectively). When using a new scale for grading patellofemoral arthritis, the root lesion group had statistically greater scores (M = 8.33 ± 3.38) than the non-root lesion patients (M = 5.67 ± 3.07) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with root lesions have a greater degree of patellofemoral cartilage lesions than patients without root lesions. The presence of cartilage lesions preoperatively in root lesion patients has presented the question of whether repair is worthwhile or if one should delay surgery until arthroplasty is indicated. Future research should be carried out on outcomes of root repair surgery in patients with patellofemoral cartilage lesions, in addition to considering the patient's age, activity level, and other risk factors.

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy With Distalization for the Treatment of Patella Alta.

One of the most common osseous abnormalities associated with patellar instability and patellofemoral osteochondral disease is patella alta, characterized by an Insall-Salvati ratio ≥1.2 or a Caton-Deschamps Index ≥1.2. Despite being the most common surgical treatment option for patella alta, tibial tubercle osteotomy with distalization raises concerns due to the complete detachment of the tubercle, which may lead to damage of local vascularity from periosteal detachment and increased mechanical stress at the attachment site. These factors are related to greater risk of complications, such as fractures, loss of fixation, delayed union, or nonunion of the tuberosity. We describe a technique for tibial tubercle osteotomy with distalization that aims to minimize these complications through care with the osteotomy, stabilization, bone cut thickness, and local periosteum.

Establishing minimal detectable change thresholds for the international knee documentation committee and Kujala scores at one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To define the minimal detectable change (MDC) for the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) and Kujala scores one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA). METHODS: A distribution-based method (one-half the standard deviation of the mean difference between postoperative and preoperative outcome scores) was applied to establish MDC thresholds among 225 patients undergoing primary PFA at a single high-volume musculoskeletal-care center. Stability of change in MDC achievement was explored by quantifying the proportion of achievement at one- and two-year postoperative timepoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association between sociodemographic and operative features on MDC achievement. RESULTS: MDC thresholds for the Kujala score were 10.3 (71.1% achievement) and 10.6 (70.4% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. The MDC thresholds for the IKDC score were 11.2 (78.1% achievement) and 12.3 (69.0% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. Predictors of achieving the MDC for the Kujala and IKDC scores at both time points were lower preoperative Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 24.1 and 7.6 for the Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively, were associated with a 90% MDC achievement probability. When preoperative thresholds approached 64.3 and 48.3 for the Kujala and IKDC, respectively, MDC achievement probability reduced to 50%. CONCLUSION: The MDC thresholds for the Kujala and IKDC scores two years after PFA were 10.6 and 12.3, respectively. Clinically significant health status changes were maintained overall, with a slight decrease in achievement rates between one and two years. MDC achievement was associated with disability at presentation, and several probability-based preoperative thresholds were defined. These findings may assist knee surgeons with patient selection and the decision to proceed with PFA by better understanding the patient-specific propensity for MDC achievement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.