ABSTRACT
The present in vivo randomized, triple-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study evaluated the effectiveness of a hybrid light (HL) source on the color change, stability, and tooth sensitivity in patients submitted to different in-office bleaching techniques. Twenty volunteers were divided into two groups and four subgroups. A split-mouth design was conducted to compare two in-office bleaching techniques (with and without light activation): 35% Lase Peroxide Sensy (LPS) + HL: 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) + HL; 35% LPS: 35% HP; 25% LPS + HL: 25% HP + HL; and 35% Whiteness HP (WHP): 35% HP. For the groups activated with HL, the HP was applied on the enamel surface three consecutive times using a 3 × 2-minute protocol (three HL activations for two minutes each, with a 30-second interval for a total of seven minutes and 30 seconds) for each gel application, totaling 22 minutes and 30 seconds. For the other groups, HP was applied 3 × 15 minutes, totaling 45 minutes. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color change (ΔE) before the treatment and 24 hours, one week, and one, 12, and 36 months after. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate the tooth sensitivity before the treatment, immediately following treatment, 24 hours, and one week after. Analysis of variance, Tukey's, Kruskall-Wallis, and Wilcoxon tests, all with α = 0.05 were performed. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences (ΔE) between the in-office bleaching techniques with or without HL in the periods evaluated; the activation with HL required 50% less time to achieve such results. The groups without HL presented statistical differences for ΔE when comparing 24 hours with the other follow-up times (intergroup) and an increase in tooth sensitivity in the initial periods. All techniques and bleaching agents were effective on bleaching during a 36-month evaluation of color stability. The groups activated with HL presented lower sensitivity and required a lower activation time.
