Peanut allergy in Italy: A unique Italian perspective.

Background: Peanut allergy has not been well characterized in Italy. Objective: Our aim was to better define the clinical features of peanut allergy in Italy and to detect the peanut proteins involved in allergic reactions. Methods: A total of 22 centers participated in a prospective survey of peanut allergy over a 6-month period. Clinical histories were confirmed by in vivo and/or in vitro diagnostic means in all cases. Potential risk factors for peanut allergy occurrence were considered. Levels of IgE to Arachis hypogea (Ara h) 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 and profilin were measured. Results: A total of 395 patients (aged 2-80 years) were enrolled. Of the participants, 35% reported local reactions, 38.2% reported systemic reactions, and 26.6% experienced anaphylaxis. The sensitization profile was dominated by Ara h 9 (77% of patients were sensitized to it), whereas 35% were sensitized to pathogenesis-related protein 10 (PR-10) and 26% were sensitized to seed storage proteins (SSPs). Sensitization to 2S albumins (Ara h 2 and Ara h 6) or lipid transfer protein (LTP) was associated with the occurrence of more severe symptoms, whereas profilin and PR-10 sensitization were associated with milder symptoms. Cosensitization to profilin reduced the risk of severe reactions in both Ara h 2- and LTP-sensitized patients. SSP sensitization prevailed in younger patients whereas LTP prevailed in older patients (P < .01). SSP sensitization occurred mainly in northern Italy, whereas LTP sensitization prevailed in Italy's center and south. Atopic dermatitis, frequency of peanut ingestion, peanut consumption by other family members, or use of peanut butter did not seem to be risk factors for peanut allergy onset. Conclusions: In Italy, peanut allergy is rare and dominated by LTP in the country's center and south and by SSP in the north. These 2 sensitizations seem mutually exclusive. The picture differs from that in Anglo-Saxon countries.

Anaphylactic Reactions After Discontinuation of Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy: A Clonal Mast Cell Disorder Should Be Suspected.

BACKGROUND: Up to 75% of patients with severe anaphylactic reactions after Hymenoptera sting are at risk of further severe reactions if re-stung. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is highly effective in protecting individuals with ascertained Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) and previous severe reactions. After a 3- to 5-year VIT course, most patients remain protected after VIT discontinuation. Otherwise, a lifelong treatment should be considered in high-risk patients (eg, in mastocytosis). Several case reports evidenced that patients with mastocytosis and HVA, although protected during VIT, can re-experience severe and sometimes fatal reactions after VIT discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patients who lost protection after VIT discontinuation may suffer from clonal mast cell disorders. METHODS: The survey describes the characteristics of patients who received a full course of VIT for previous severe reactions and who experienced another severe reaction at re-sting after VIT discontinuation. Those with a Red Española de Mastocitosis score of 2 or more or a serum basal tryptase level of more than 25 ng/mL underwent a hematological workup (bone marrow biopsy, KIT mutation, expression of aberrant CD25) and/or skin biopsy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age, 56.3 years; 89.5% males) were evaluated. All of them had received at least 4 years of VIT and were protected. After VIT discontinuation they were re-stung and developed, in all but 1 case, severe anaphylactic reactions (12 with loss of consciousness, in the absence of urticaria/angioedema). Eighteen patients (94.7%) had a clonal mast cell disorder, 8 of them with normal tryptase. CONCLUSIONS: Looking at this selected population, we suggest that mastocytosis should be considered in patients developing severe reactions at re-sting after VIT discontinuation and, as a speculation, patients with mastocytosis and HVA should be VIT-treated lifelong.

Chronic cough and eosinophilic esophagitis: an uncommon association.

An increasing number of children, usually with gastrointestinal symptoms, is diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE), and a particular subset of these patients complains of airway manifestations. We present the case of a 2-year-old child with chronic dry cough in whom EE was found after a first diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) due to pathological 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Traditional allergologic tests were negative, while patch tests were diagnostic for cow's milk allergy. We discuss the intriguing relationship between GERD and EE and the use of patch test for the allergologic screening of patients.

Local angioedema following sun exposures: a report of five cases.

Angioedema is a hereditary or acquired disease characterized by localized non-pitting swelling of the subcutaneous tissue which can affect either skin or mucous membranes. Acquired angioedema can often be related to a heterogeneous group of etiological factors including physical stimuli, although up to 38% of cases remain idiopathic. We describe 5 patients who developed an angioedema following sun exposures. All patients reported an intensely stinging angioedema strictly limited to face and extremities, when exposed to solar light. Urticarial wheals were never observed or reported by patients, and oral antihistamines proved to be of no help in preventing or improving the condition of lesions. Laboratory and phototesting data allowed ruling out all other acquired or inherited diseases characterized by photosensitivity. We propose that solar angioedema should be considered a novel clinical entity.

Flexible approaches in the design of subcutaneous immunotherapy protocols for Hymenoptera venom allergy.

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy is an effective method for the treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Different extracts and treatment schedules are available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in 3 cohorts of patients sensitized to Vespula species. METHODS: In this open study, 43 patients were treated with a subcutaneous aqueous extract for induction and maintenance (AA), 34 with a subcutaneous depot extract for induction and maintenance (DD), and 29 with subcutaneous aqueous and subcutaneous depot extracts for induction and maintenance, respectively (AD). Cluster schedules were followed to reach maintenance, and adverse effects during treatment and after naturally occurring stings were recorded. RESULTS: Depot immunotherapy was better tolerated mainly owing to the lower frequency of local adverse effects in the induction phase (5.9% vs 42.5% and 1.3% vs 5.1% on a per patient and per dose basis, respectively; P < .001 for both) and for effects occurring within 60 minutes after vaccination (2.9% vs 19.2% and 0.2% vs 2.8% on a per patient and per dose basis; P = .03 and P < .001, respectively). Furthermore, 19 of 20 AA, 9 of 9 AD, and 10 of 10 DD patients who were restung experienced only minor local effects. CONCLUSIONS: Venom immunotherapy is efficacious. Although there was no decrease in systemic reactions, depot immunotherapy to Vespula venom induced fewer early local adverse effects. Patients undergoing an induction phase with an aqueous extract can benefit from switching to a depot extract during maintenance. Increasing the flexibility of the immunization schedules may improve compliance with this potentially lifesaving treatment.