ABSTRACT
A circular economy based on symbiotic relationships among sectors, where the waste from one is resource to another, holds promise for cost-effective and sustainable production. This research explores such a model for the agriculture, energy, and construction sectors in California. Here, we develop new an understanding for the synergistic utilization mechanisms for rice hull, a byproduct from rice production, as a feedstock for electricity generation and rice hull ash (RHA) used as a supplementary cementitious material in concrete. A suite of methods including experimental analysis, techno-economic analysis (TEA), and life-cycle assessment (LCA) were applied to estimate the cost and environmental performance of the system. TEA results showed that the electricity price required for break even on expenses without selling RHA is $0.07/kWh, lower than the market price. As such, RHA may be available at little to no cost to concrete producers. Our experimental results showed the viability of RHA to be used as a supplementary cementitious material, meaning it can replace a portion of the cement used in concrete. LCA results showed that replacing 15% of cement with RHA in concrete can reduce carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions by 15% while still meeting material performance targets. While the substitution rate of RHA for cement may be modest, RHA generated from California alone could mitigate 0.2% of total CO2e from the entire cement production sector in the United States and 1% in California.
ABSTRACT
This study quantifies the financial and environmental impacts of a microalgal bioenergy system that attempts to maximize circular flows by recovering and reusing the carbon, nutrients, and water within the system. The system produces microalgal biomass using liquid digestate of an anaerobic digester that processes 45 metric tons of food waste and generates 28.6 m3 of permeate daily in California, and three energy production scenarios from the biomass are considered: producing biodiesel, electricity, and both. In all scenarios, the resulting energy products delivered only modest reductions in environmental impacts as measured by carbon dioxide equivalent emissions. The carbon intensities (CIs) of biodiesel from this study were 91.0 gCO2e/MJ and 93.3 gCO2e/MJ, which were lower than 94.71 gCO2e/MJ of conventional petroleum diesel, and the CI of electricity from this study was 70.6 gCO2e/MJ, lower than the average electricity grid CI in California (82.92 gCO2e/MJ). The economic analysis results show that generating electricity alone can be profitable, while biodiesel produced via this system is not cost competitive with conventional diesel due to high capital expenses. Thus, generating electricity in lieu of biodiesel appears to be a better option to maximize the use of waste flows and supply lower-carbon energy.
