PET/CT and SPECT/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2)-positive breast cancer is characterized by amplification of the HER2 gene and is associated with more aggressive tumor growth, increased risk of metastasis, and poorer prognosis when compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. HER2 expression is therefore a critical tumor feature that can be used to diagnose and treat breast cancer. Moving forward, advances in HER2 in vivo imaging, involving the use of techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), may allow for a greater role for HER2 status in guiding the management of breast cancer patients. This will apply both to patients who are HER2-positive and those who have limited-to-minimal immunohistochemical HER2 expression (HER2-low), with imaging ultimately helping clinicians determine the size and location of tumors. Additionally, PET and SPECT could help evaluate effectiveness of HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab or pertuzumab for HER2-positive cancers, and specially modified antibody drug conjugates (ADC), such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan, for HER2-low variants. This review will explore the current and future role of HER2 imaging in personalizing the care of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer.

One out of eight women will be affected by breast cancer during her lifetime. Imaging plays a key role in breast cancer detection and management, providing physicians with information about tumor location, heterogeneity, and dissemination. In this review, we describe the latest advances in PET/CT imaging of breast cancer, including novel applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT and the development and testing of new agents for primary and metastatic breast tumor imaging and therapy. Ultimately, these radiopharmaceuticals may guide personalized approaches to optimize treatment based on the patient's specific tumor profile, and may become a new standard of care. In addition, they may enhance the assessment of treatment efficacy and lead to improved outcomes for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis.

Imaging the Side Effects of CAR T Cell Therapy: A Primer for the Practicing Radiologist.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a revolutionary form of immunotherapy that has proven to be efficacious in the treatment of many hematologic cancers. CARs are modified T lymphocytes that express an artificial receptor specific to a tumor-associated antigen. These engineered cells are then reintroduced to upregulate the host immune responses and eradicate malignant cells. While the use of CAR T cell therapy is rapidly expanding, little is known about how common side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) present radiographically. Here we provide a comprehensive review of how side effects present in different organ systems and how they can be optimally imaged. Early and accurate recognition of the radiographic presentation of these side effects is critical to the practicing radiologist and their patients so that these side effects can be promptly identified and treated.

Novel Targets, Novel Treatments: The Changing Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift. Once a disease with limited potential therapies, treatment options for patients have exploded with the availability of molecular testing to direct management and targeted therapies to treat tumors with specific driver mutations. New in vitro diagnostics allow for the early and non-invasive detection of disease, and emerging in vivo imaging techniques allow for better detection and monitoring. The development of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has arguably been the biggest advance in lung cancer treatment, given that the vast majority of NSCLC tumors can be treated with these therapies. Specific targeted therapies, including those against KRAS, EGFR, RTK, and others have also improved the outcomes for those individuals bearing an actionable mutation. New and emerging therapies, such as bispecific antibodies, CAR T cell therapy, and molecular targeted radiotherapy, offer promise to patients for whom none of the existing therapies have proved effective. In this review, we provide the most up-to-date survey to our knowledge regarding emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for lung cancer to provide clinicians with a comprehensive reference of the options for treatment available now and those which are soon to come.

Differential effects of exposure to toxic or nontoxic mold spores on brain inflammation and Morris water maze performance.

People who live or work in moldy buildings often complain of "brain fog" that interferes with cognitive performance. Until recently, there was no published research on the effects of controlled exposure to mold stimuli on cognitive function or an obvious mechanism of action, fueling controversy over these claims. The constellation of health problems reported by mold-exposed individuals (respiratory issues, fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and cognitive deficits) correspond to those caused by innate immune activation following exposure to bacterial or viral stimuli. To determine if mold-induced innate immune activation might cause cognitive issues, we quantified the effects of both toxic and nontoxic mold on brain immune activation and spatial memory in the Morris water maze. We intranasally administered either 1) intact, toxic Stachybotrys chartarum spores; 2) ethanol-extracted, nontoxic Stachybotrys chartarum spores; or 3) control saline vehicle to mice. Inhalation of nontoxic spores caused significant deficits in the test of long-term memory of platform location, while not affecting short-term memory. Inhalation of toxic spores increased motivation to reach the platform. Interestingly, in both groups of mold-exposed males, numbers of interleukin-1ß-immunoreactive cells in many areas of the hippocampus significantly correlated with latency to find the platform, path length, and swimming speed during training, but not during testing for long-term memory. These data add to our prior evidence that mold inhalation can interfere with cognitive processing in different ways depending on the task, and that brain inflammation is significantly correlated with changes in behavior.

Stand-Alone Xen Gel Microstent Implantation Compared With Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy.

PRCIS: Both Xen gel Microstent implantation and Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy are safe and effective as stand-alone procedures, but the Xen Gel Microstent was associated with more postoperative interventions and achieved higher success at a lower intraocular pressure threshold. PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of stand-alone Xen Gel Microstent implantation compared with stand-alone KDB goniotomy for moderate to severe glaucoma. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, case-series analysis comparing outcomes of Xen Gel Microstent implantation and KDB goniotomy stand-alone cases in 75 eyes. Primary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, glaucoma medication reduction, surgical success, and complications. Surgical success was defined using IOP<21 mm Hg and IOP<18 mm Hg thresholds, with or without glaucoma medications, and without further glaucoma surgery. Subjects were followed for at least 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean baseline IOP was comparable between the Xen Gel Microstent and KDB goniotomy groups (23.7±8.4 and 25.9±7.9 mm Hg, respectively, P =0.32). At 24 months after surgery, the mean IOP after Xen Gel Microstent was 14.7±3.2 mm Hg (32.7% reduction from baseline, P =0.018) and KDB goniotomy was 16.7±3.2 mm Hg (40.4% reduction from baseline, P =0.049). Although the mean IOP was significantly lower during the first month after Xen Gel Microstent implantation, no difference in mean IOP was observed between the 2 treatment groups at 24 months after surgery ( P =0.416). At 24 months after surgery, the percent reduction of IOP from baseline was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean reduction of glaucoma medications from baseline at 24 months was 1.69 drops after Xen Gel Microstent implantation ( P =.008) and 1.67 drops after KDB goniotomy ( P =0.038). Postoperative complications were nonvision-threatening and were not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P =0.550). Interventions not included with complications were needling performed in 21 (37%) of eyes in the Xen Gel Microstent group and Nd:YAG goniopuncture in 1 (5.6%) eye after KDB goniotomy. With an IOP threshold <21 mm Hg, surgical success was not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P =0.06). At a lower IOP threshold (<18 mm Hg), surgical success was higher after Xen Gel Microstent implantation compared with KDB goniotomy ( P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both stand-alone Xen Gel Microstent implantation and KDB goniotomy can effectively and safely reduce IOP for moderate to severe glaucoma. The Xen Gel Microstent was associated with a higher need for postoperative interventions and achieved greater success at a lower IOP threshold.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Multimodality Pictorial Review.

Cancer immunotherapies are drugs that modulate the body's own immune system as an anticancer strategy. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies interfere with cell surface binding proteins that function to promote self-recognition and tolerance, ultimately leading to upregulation of the immune response. Given the striking success of these agents in early trials in melanoma and lung cancer, they have now been studied in many types of cancer and have become a pillar of anticancer therapy for many tumor types. However, abundant upregulation results in a new class of side effects, known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). It is critical for the practicing radiologist to be able to recognize these events to best contribute to care for patients on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive system-based review of immune-related adverse events and associated imaging findings. Further, we detail the best imaging modalities for each as well as describe problem solving modalities. Given that IRAEs can be subclinical before becoming clinically apparent, radiologists may be the first provider to recognize them, providing an opportunity for early treatment. Awareness of IRAEs and how to best image them will prepare radiologists to make a meaningful contribution to patient care as part of the clinical team.

Comparison of Silicone- and Porous-Plate Ahmed Glaucoma Valves.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes after implantation of the silicone-plate (model FP7) and porous polyethylene-plate (model M4) Ahmed Glaucoma Valves. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, comparative series. A total of 52 eyes (52 patients) were treated with either the silicone or porous plate Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Hypertensive phase was defined as intraocular pressure >21 mmHg during the first 3 months postoperatively. Success was defined as 5 mmHg ≤intraocular pressure ≤21 mmHg (with or without additional glaucoma medications), without loss of light perception and without additional glaucoma procedures. Patients were monitored for 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The pre-operative intraocular pressure was 29.9 ± 6.6 mmHg and 33.8 ± 10.5 in the silicone-plate and porous-plate groups, respectively (P = 0.118). At 12 months after surgery, the mean intraocular pressure was 13.6 ± 4.7 mmHg in the silicone-plate group and 17.9 ± 10.9 mmHg in the porous-plate group (P = 0.141). The mean number of glaucoma medications at 12 months was 1.64 ± 1.40 mmHg and 1.89 ± 1.54 mmHg in the silicone- and porous-plate groups, respectively (P = 0.605). Hypertensive phase was not significantly different in the two groups (50.0% of the silicone-plate and 57.7% of the porous-plate groups, P = 0.578). At 12 months after surgery, the percent success for the silicone-plate and porous-plate groups was 88.5% and 53.8%, respectively (P = 0.005). Complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The porous-plate Ahmed Glaucoma Valve showed similar average intraocular pressure reduction compared with the silicone-plate model. At 12 months after surgery, there was a significantly lower success rate in the porous-plate compared with the silicone-plate group.