Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a computer-assisted training (CAT) program for patients with left unilateral neglect would decrease symptoms of this disorder. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation unit of a government medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty right-handed patients who showed left unilateral neglect on screening measures (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, Random Letter Cancellation Test) were assigned to a CAT treatment group; and 20 patients who showed similar levels of unilateral neglect on the screening measures were assigned to a control group. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects were inpatients in an acute rehabilitation unit and received rehabilitation therapy, including physical and occupational therapy. The treatment group received the experimental, CAT program, 12 to 20 sessions of about 45 minutes each. Treatment consisted of 5 modules, each of increasing complexity, to improve attention to stimuli in the left hemisphere, and 2 simulated wheelchair obstacle courses to propel a wheelchair while avoiding obstacles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Computer tasks designed for this study (Video Tracking Test, Video Obstacle Course Test), a real-life wheelchair obstacle course (WCOC), and incident reports indicating falls and accidents. RESULTS: Trained subjects performed significantly better on the WCOC than control subjects (F(1,36) = 23.41, p = .00003). Also, trained subjects had fewer incident reports than control subjects during their hospitalization (chi(2)(1,)(n)(=38) = 5.15, p = .023). CONCLUSIONS: CAT can reduce unilateral neglect symptoms on experimental tasks and some measures of accident risk.

Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether rightward orienting bias, without neglect of left hemispace, increased accident risk. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation unit of department of government medical center. PATIENTS: Successive right-cerebrovascular accident (CVA) admissions were reviewed over a 2-year period. Only patients with left hemisphere damage, recent abusive drinking, dementia, or inpatient stays of less than 3 weeks were excluded. Fifty-five right-CVA subjects were divided into three groups, based on starting point and omissions in left hemispace on the Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure Drawing and Random Letter Cancellation test. Thirty-two patients were placed in the L-OMIT group (omitted stimuli in left hemispace), 11 patients were placed in the R-BIAS group (began tasks to the right without omissions), and 12 patients were placed in the Non-Neglect Stroke group (no evidence of unilateral neglect). Twenty male inpatients with no history of brain damage served as controls (Normal Control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of hospital falls and wheelchair obstacle course contacts. RESULTS: Both the L-OMIT and the R-BIAS groups had more inpatient falls than the other groups F(3,71) = 6.11, p < .001. On the wheelchair obstacle course, the L-OMIT group made more left-sided wheelchair collisions than any other group. However, the R-BIAS group also made more errors than the Non-Neglect Stroke and the Normal Control groups, F(3,55) = 5.72, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that rightward orienting bias has clinical significance, even without more serious symptoms of unilateral neglect.

Acquiescence in needs assessment studies of the elderly.

This study demonstrated that acquiescence response set can inflate estimates of agency awareness in needs assessment studies of the elderly. However, acquiescence does not appear to inflate estimates of service utilization of service need. Contrary to past survey research, less educated respondents were no more likely to exhibit acquiescence than better educated respondents. Similarly, the hypothesis that African-Americans would display more acquiescence than Caucasians received only minimal support.