In-Hospital Risk Factors for Reintervention and Amputation in Brachial Arterial Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Brachial artery trauma is a rare but potentially devastating injury. There is little data regarding risk factors for reintervention and amputation prevention in this population, as well as anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) regimens and outcomes after discharge in trauma patients with vascular injuries requiring repair. This study aims to identify in-hospital risk factors for reintervention and amputation and stratify outcomes of follow-up by discharge AC or AP regimen. METHODS: The AAST Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial database was queried for all patients who underwent traumatic brachial arterial repair from 2013 to 2022. Patients were evaluated by need for reintervention, amputation, and outcomes at follow-up by AC or AP regimen. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients required brachial repair, 28 (9%) required reoperation, and 8 (2.6%) required amputation. High injury severity score and an increased number of packed red blood cells and platelets showed a significant increase for reoperation and amputation. Damage control and shunt use were significant for the need to reoperate. Seventy-four percent (221/298) of patients were discharged with postoperative AC or AP regimens. There was no significant difference of short-term follow-up by type of AC or AP regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Damage control and temporary shunt may lead to additional operations but not an increase in amputations. However, anticoagulation intraoperatively and postoperatively does not appear to play a significant role in reducing reintervention. It also suggests that there is no increase in short-term follow-up complications with or without AC or AP therapy.

Traumatic Endograft Fracture With Subsequent Type IIIb Endoleak.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is commonly treated via endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A known complication of EVAR is an endoleak: types I to IV. Type III endoleaks have been shown to have a relative risk of 8.95 for late rupture requiring prompt treatment. These endoleaks have been found to be caused by over dilation of the main body causing graft fabric distortion, fractures of metallic struts, fabric wear from chronic micromotion, fabric tears, and suture breakage. We present a case of traumatic EVAR fracture with subsequent type IIIb endoleak after blunt abdominal trauma. This highlights the need for close evaluation of endografts after abdominal trauma. These traumatic events can lead to traumatic fracture of endografts creating endoleaks that if not treated promptly can lead to rupture.

Systematic review of groin incision surgical site infection preventative measures in vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Groin surgical site infections (SSIs) after open revascularization can lead to devastating consequences in patients. As a result, prevention has been crucial in minimizing the rate of SSIs. This review aims to evaluate the current body of literature regarding prevention ,techniques including prophylactic flaps, incision technique, topical antibiotic use, closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy, and adhesive drapes. METHODS: This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A systematic review was conducted using the Google Scholar, PubMed, and Cochrane Review databases regarding the five prevention topics. The authors identified 1371 potential studies with 33 studies selected and analyzed after systematic review regarding the five preventative topics. RESULTS: The primary outcome of interest was how the rate of SSI was affected with each preventative technique. As a result, the recommendations are as follows. We suggest prophylactic flaps be considered in high-risk surgical patients undergoing open arterial exposure of the groin (Grade 2C). We suggest consideration of transverse incisions for open arterial exposure of the groin as a means of SSI prevention (Grade 2C). Given the lack of data regarding topical antibiotics no recommendation can be made regarding its use, we suggest closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy be used in groin surgical incisions at high risk for SSI (Grade 2B). Given the paucity of data regarding adhesive drapes, such as Ioban, no recommendation can be made regarding its use. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the effects of various preventative techniques and their potential benefit in the prevention of SSI in the groin. However, there is a glaring deficit in the available data, emphasizing the need for additional robust studies to better delineate their effectiveness and implementation into surgical practice. The use of endovascular techniques continues to increase, thus limiting the number of open arterial procedures and the potential for further studies to be conducted. To provide the high-quality studies needed to better evaluate these prevention techniques, large multi-institutional collaboration will likely be necessary to provide the appropriate number of patients to evaluate true effectiveness.

Effect of Post-splenectomy Booster Vaccine Program on Vaccination Compliance in Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Council on Immunization Practice recommended an additional post-splenectomy booster vaccine at 8 weeks following the initial vaccine. The objective of this study was to evaluate our vaccination compliance rate and what sociodemographic factors were associated with noncompliance following this recommendation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a performance improvement database of trauma patients eligible for post-splenectomy vaccination (PSV) at a level I trauma center was carried out between 2009 and 2018. Overall and institutional compliance with PSV was compared before and after the addition of booster vaccine recommendation. Factors associated with booster noncompliance were also identified. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were identified. PSV compliance rate in the pre-booster was 98.4%, while overall and institutional post-booster compliance rate were significantly lower at 66.9% (P ≤ .001) and 50.0% (P ≤ .001), respectively. Compared to booster institutional compliers, institutional noncompliers lived farther from the trauma center (48 vs. 86 miles, P = .02), and though not statistically significant, these patients were generally older (34.9 vs. 40.5, P = .05). DISCUSSION: PSV booster compliance is low even with the current educational materials and recommendations. Additional approaches to improve compliance rates need to be implemented, such as sending letters to the patient and their primary care providers (PCPs), collaborating with rehab/long-term acute care centers, communicating with city and county health departments and city pharmacies, or mirroring other countries and creating a national database for asplenic patients to provide complete information.

Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters before discharge: Is it associated with increased incidence of pulmonary embolism?

BACKGROUND: Severely injured trauma patients are at high risk of developing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli (PE), and may have contraindications to prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCFs) are used to act as a mechanical obstruction to prevent PE in high risk populations and those with deep venous thrombosis who cannot be anticoagulated. The removal rate of rIVCFs is variable in trauma centers, including our previous published rate of 50% to 89%/year. Indwelling filters carry a risk of significant morbidity and the success of retrieval decreases as the dwell time increases. We hypothesized that once patients could receive appropriate prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation, rIVCF could be removed before hospital discharge without impact on occurrence or recurrence of PE. METHODS: All trauma patients with rIVCF placed and removed between January 2006 and August 2018 were reviewed. We collected data from record review from admission to 6 months postfilter removal, including demographics, filter indication, filter type, dwell time, placement and removal complications, antithrombosis medications, location of venous thromboembolism, complications, and discharge disposition. Exposure of interest was timing of filter removal: before (BEF) or after hospital discharge (AFT). The outcome of interest was whether the patient had a documented PE within 6 months of filter removal. RESULTS: A total of 281 rIVCFs were placed, 218 were eligible for removal, 72.4% (158/218) were retrieved with 63% (100/158) removed before discharge. Mean filter duration was 26 days and 103 days for the before and after groups, respectively. No differences (p > 0.05) were noted in the distribution of demographic and clinical factors except for filter indication (venous thromboembolism indication, 95% in AFT vs. 74% in BEF, p = 0.0043). Postremoval PE rates were 0% BEF and 1% AFT (Fisher's exact test, p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that removal of rIVCFs before discharge once patients are appropriately anticoagulated is a safe strategy to improve retrieval rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

A Connectomic Atlas of the Human Cerebrum-Chapter 5: The Insula and Opercular Cortex.

In this supplement, we build on work previously published under the Human Connectome Project. Specifically, we show a comprehensive anatomic atlas of the human cerebrum demonstrating all 180 distinct regions comprising the cerebral cortex. The location, functional connectivity, and structural connectivity of these regions are outlined, and where possible a discussion is included of the functional significance of these areas. In part 5, we specifically address regions relevant to the insula and opercular cortex.