Implications of Palliative Care Consultation Timing among a Cohort of Hospice Decedents.

Background: Earlier palliative care consultation is associated with less intensive medical care and improved quality outcomes for patients with cancer. However, there are limited data about how the timing of palliative care affects utilization among noncancer patients exposed to palliative care consultation. Objective: Comparison of health care utilization for hospice decedents who received early versus late palliative care. Design: A retrospective cohort study utilizing hospital and hospice administrative databases. Setting/Subjects: Patients with cancer and noncancer diagnoses who received specialty palliative care consultation before dying at a local hospice. Measurements: Comparing early (>90 days before death) versus late (<90 days before death) palliative care, outcome measures included intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and hospice length of stay (LOS). Results: Of 233 hospice decedents in 2014 who had palliative care referrals, 36 (15.4%) had early and 197 (84.5%) had late referrals. Nearly half of the patients had a noncancer hospice diagnosis. Only 6% of the early group used the ICU in the last month of life, whereas 56% of the late group did. Patients receiving early palliative care had a longer median hospice LOS than those with late palliative care (138 days vs. 8 days). Conclusions: Early palliative care appears to reduce intensive medical care and increase hospice LOS for patients with a variety of end-stage diseases.

Psychometric Properties of the FACIT-Pal 14 Administered in an Outpatient Palliative Care Clinic.

BACKGROUND: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative (FACIT-Pal) 14 instrument measures the quality of life in palliative care patients but its psychometric properties are not well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of the FACIT-Pal 14 in an outpatient palliative care clinic population. METHODS: The FACIT-Pal 14 was administered to 227 patients in an outpatient palliative care clinic at a large, urban academic medical center. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Crohnbach's α, and principal component analysis was used to investigate for multiple underlying latent variables. Construct validity was tested by comparing mean scores in various subgroups. RESULTS: The FACIT-Pal 14 has Crohnbach's α of 0.76, which increases to 0.79 if 2 items are removed. Principal component analysis supports a single latent variable underlying the instrument. Significantly lower mean scores were found in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) functional status 3 to 4 compared with patients with ECOG functional status 1-2 ( P = .007), in patients with life expectancy under 6 months compared to those with 6 months or greater ( P = .003), and in patients referred to clinic for pain and symptom management compared with patients referred for other reasons ( P = .038). Instrument scores did not significantly differ between men and women or between white and nonwhite patients ( P = .525 and P = .263, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In an outpatient palliative care clinic population, the FACIT-Pal 14 has good internal consistency, but removal of 2 items would improve consistency. One latent variable underlies the instrument and there is evidence of construct validity.

Dual intervention to improve pathologic staging of resectable lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Detection of lymph node metastasis is of immense prognostic value in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but routine pathologic nodal staging is suboptimal. To determine the impact on the rate of detection of nodal metastasis, we tested dual intervention with a prelabeled lymph node specimen collection kit to improve intraoperative node dissection and a fastidious gross dissection of the lung resection specimen for intrapulmonary lymph nodes. METHODS: We matched dual-intervention cases with controls staged using standard surgical specimen collection and pathologic examination protocols. Controls were hierarchically matched for extent of resection, laterality, surgeon, pathologist, and T stage. All statistical comparisons were made with exact conditional logistic regression, to account for the matched case-control design. RESULTS: One hundred dual-intervention cases were matched with 100 controls. The dual interventions resulted in approximately a 3-fold increase in the number of lymph nodes examined and the number of lymph nodes with metastasis detected; they also increased the proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis from 21% to 35% (p = 0.02). There were strong trends toward higher aggregate stage distribution, and eligibility for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in the dual-intervention cases. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of interventions improved the thoroughness and accuracy of pathologic nodal staging. A prospective randomized trial to test the survival impact of the dual interventions is warranted.

Use of a surgical specimen-collection kit to improve mediastinal lymph-node examination of resectable lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Pathologic examination of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is critical in the determination of prognosis and postoperative management. Although systematic nodal dissection is recommended, the quality of pathologic lymph-node staging often falls short of recommendations in practice. We tested the feasibility of improving pathologic lymph-node staging of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer by using a prelabeled specimen-collection kit. METHODS: Case-control study with comparison of 51 resections, using a special lymph-node collection kit, with 51 controls matched for surgeon, extent of resection, pathologist, and T category. Appropriate statistical methods were used for all comparisons. RESULTS: The median number of MLNs examined increased from one in the control group, to six in the case group (p < 0.001). The percentage of resections attaining the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended quality of MLN examination, and the proportion that would have been eligible for recent landmark postresection adjuvant therapy trials increased significantly (p < 0.001). The duration of surgery and postoperative complication rates were similar between cases and controls. Eighteen percent of kit cases had positive MLN, compared with 8% of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a specialized specimen-collection kit for MLN examination was feasible, markedly improved MLN staging, and showed a trend toward increased detection of patients with MLN metastasis, with only a modest increase in duration of surgery, and no increase in perioperative morbidity, mortality, or hospital length of stay.