French Military Neurosurgery: At Home and Abroad.

The origins of military neurosurgery are closely linked to those of neurosurgery in France and more particularly in Paris. The history of the field starts with its origins by 2 men, Thierry de Martel and Clovis Vincent. The first note about the creation of military neurosurgery was in 1942, when Marcel David was reassigned from the Sainte Anne Hospital to practice at the Val-de-Grâce Military Hospital. David trained the first military neurosurgeon. The field of military neurosurgery was subsequently developed at the Val-de-Grâce Military Hospital, at Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital in Toulon in 1990 and then at Percy Military Teaching Hospital in 1996. Over 29 military neurosurgeons were trained in these institutions. Since 2000, French military neurosurgeons have been deployed from France in the Mobile Neurosurgical Unit. This Mobile Neurosurgical Unit represents 12% of all medical evacuation of casualties categorized as the high dependency level. Neurosurgeons were able to adapt to asymmetrical wars, such as in the Afghanistan campaign where they were deployed in the Role 3 medical treatment facility, and more recently in sub-Saharan conflicts where they were deployed in forward surgical roles. To manage the increasing craniocerebral war casualties in the forward surgical team, the French Military Health Service Academy established a training course referred to as the "Advanced Course for Deployment Surgery" providing neurosurgical damage control skills to general surgeons. Finally, military neurosurgery is reinventing itself to adapt to future conflicts through the enhancement of surgical practices via the addition of head, face, and neck surgeons.

Neurosurgical management of penetrating brain injury during World War I: A historical cohort.

During World War I, 25% of penetrating injuries were in the cephalic region. Major Henri Brodier described his surgical techniques in a book in which he reported every consecutive penetrating brain injury (PBI) that he operated on from August 1914 to July 1916. The aim was to collate his data and discuss significant differences in management between soldiers who survived and those who died. We conducted a retrospective survey that included every consecutive PBI patient operated on by Henri Brodier from August 1914 to April 1916 and recorded in his book. We reported medical and surgical management. Seventy-seven patients underwent trepanation by Henri Brodier for PBI. Regarding injury mechanism, 66 procedures (86%) were for shrapnel injury. Regarding location, 21 (30%) involved the whole convexity. Intracranial venous sinus wound was diagnosed intraoperatively in 11 patients (14%). Postoperatively, 7 patients (9%) had seizures, 5 (6%) had cerebral herniation, 3 (4%) had cerebral abscess, and 5 (6%) had meningitis. No patients with abscess or meningitis survived. No significant intergroup differences were found for injury mechanism or wound location, including the venous sinus. Extensive initial surgery with debridement must be prioritized. Infectious complications must not be neglected. We should not forget the lessons of the past when managing casualties in present-day and future conflicts.