Hand Injuries During COVID-19 UK Lockdown: How Did the Pandemic Affect 1-Year Functional Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic in March 2020, forcing the United Kingdom into a national lockdown. The aim was to evaluate the effect of this lockdown on hand injuries referred through the trauma and orthopedics virtual fracture clinic (VFC) service and their subsequent management given limited resources. This study also aimed to identify complications and evaluate functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients referred through VFC at Queen Alexandra Hospital during April and May 2020 with hand injuries were analyzed. Isolated injuries to the carpus and wrist were excluded. Controls were compared over identical time spans prior to lockdown and after the restrictions were eased. Functional outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, at 12 months after injury. RESULTS: There was a 68% reduction in referrals of hand injuries during lockdown. Lower numbers of sporting injuries were seen, in contrast to an increased rate of falls, crush injuries, and recreational cycling. Despite a higher number of patients being discharged from VFC during lockdown, there were no increased rates of complications from conservatively managed hand fractures. Eighty percent reported low QuickDASH scores with a median of 2.3. Satisfaction was high, with 73% either satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment and outcome. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there remains a burden of hand trauma during lockdowns, and therefore, service provision for future lockdowns should consider this. Most patients can be managed conservatively, and a high proportion can be discharged from VFC with low complication rates and high satisfaction.

Management of conflict injuries to the upper limb. Part 2: reconstruction and managing complications.

This is the second of a two-part review article on the management of conflict injuries, focused on the reconstructive strategies for bone, nerve and soft tissue and to provide guidance on assessing and managing common complications associated with complex upper limb injuries. Following assessment and early surgical management, the conflict casualty will require further wound evaluation and planning prior to definitive reconstruction of limb injuries. Surgical management of the upper limb injury should aim, where possible, to preserve the limb and allow functional reconstruction. The principles of the second look procedure are to assess wound progression, further reduce the risk of infection and plan definitive reconstruction with adequate soft tissue cover. The prerequisites for successful surgical reconstruction are a stable patient, combined orthoplastic surgery expertise supported by physiotherapists and hand therapists.

Management of conflict injuries to the upper limb. Part 1: assessment and early surgical care.

Upper limb injuries are common in conflict zones. The functions of the upper limb are impossible to replicate with prosthetic replacement and wherever possible attempts should be made to preserve the limb with further secondary reconstruction aimed at restoration of function. Casualty assessment, haemorrhage control and resuscitation are simultaneously undertaken at the receiving medical facility. Primary surgical management involves decontamination and debridement, skeletal stabilization, restoration of vascularity, compartment fasciotomy where indicated and wound temporization with dressings. Operative findings and interventions should be documented and if evacuation of the casualty is possible, copies should be provided in the medical records to facilitate communication in the chain of care. Secondary procedures are required for further assessment and debridement prior to planning reconstruction and definitive fracture stabilization, nerve repair, wound cover or closure.

A review of 10 years of scapula injuries sustained by UK military personnel on operations.

BACKGROUND: Scapula fractures are relatively uncommon injuries, mostly occurring due to the effects of high-energy trauma. Rates of scapula fractures are unknown in the military setting. The aim of this study is to analyse the incidence, aetiology, associated injuries, treatment and complications of these fractures occurring in deployed military personnel. METHODS: All UK military personnel returning with upper limb injuries from Afghanistan and Iraq were retrospectively reviewed using the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine database and case notes (2004-2014). RESULTS: Forty-four scapula fractures out of 572 upper limb fractures (7.7%) were sustained over 10 years. Blast and gunshot wounds (GSW) were leading causative factors in 85%. Over half were open fractures (54%), with open blast fractures often having significant bone and soft tissue loss requiring extensive reconstruction. Multiple injuries were noted including lung, head, vascular and nerve injuries. Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were significantly higher than the average upper limb injury without a scapula fracture (p<0.0001). Brachial plexus injuries occurred in 17%. While military personnel with GSW have a favourable chance of nerve recovery, 75% of brachial plexus injuries that are associated with blast have poorer outcomes. Fixation occurred with either glenoid fractures or floating shoulders (10%); these were as a result of high velocity GSW or mounted blast ejections. There were no cases of deep soft tissue infection or osteomyelitis and all scapula fractures united. CONCLUSION: Scapula fractures have a 20 times higher incidence in military personnel compared with the civilian population, occurring predominantly as a result of blast and GSW, and a higher than average ISS. These fractures are often associated with multiple injuries, including brachial plexus injuries, where those sustained from blast have less favourable outcome. High rates of union following fixation and low rates of infection are expected despite significant contamination and soft tissue loss.