Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25023222

ABSTRACT

In order to replicate the fracture behavior of the intact human skull under impact it becomes necessary to develop a material having the mechanical properties of cranial bone. The most important properties to replicate in a surrogate human skull were found to be the fracture toughness and tensile strength of the cranial tables as well as the bending strength of the three-layer (inner table-diplöe-outer table) architecture of the human skull. The materials selected to represent the surrogate cranial tables consisted of two different epoxy resins systems with random milled glass fiber to enhance the strength and stiffness and the materials to represent the surrogate diplöe consisted of three low density foams. Forty-one three-point bending fracture toughness tests were performed on nine material combinations. The materials that best represented the fracture toughness of cranial tables were then selected and formed into tensile samples and tested. These materials were then used with the two surrogate diplöe foam materials to create the three-layer surrogate cranial bone samples for three-point bending tests. Drop tower tests were performed on flat samples created from these materials and the fracture patterns were very similar to the linear fractures in pendulum impacts of intact human skulls, previously reported in the literature. The surrogate cranial tables had the quasi-static fracture toughness and tensile strength of 2.5 MPa√ m and 53 ± 4.9 MPa, respectively, while the same properties of human compact bone were 3.1 ± 1.8 MPa√ m and 68 ± 18 MPa, respectively. The cranial surrogate had a quasi-static bending strength of 68 ± 5.7 MPa, while that of cranial bone was 82 ± 26 MPa. This material/design is currently being used to construct spherical shell samples for drop tower and ballistic tests.

3.
J Trauma ; 64(6): 1555-61, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18545123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although soft armor vests serve to prevent penetrating wounds and dissipate impact energy, the potential of nonpenetrating injury to the thorax, termed behind armor blunt trauma, does exist. Currently, the ballistic resistance of personal body armor is determined by impacting a soft armor vest over a clay backing and measuring the resulting clay deformation as specified in National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Standard-0101.04. This research effort evaluated the efficacy of a physical Human Surrogate Torso Model (HSTM) as a device for determining thoracic response when exposed to impact conditions specified in the NIJ Standard. METHODS: The HSTM was subjected to a series of ballistic impacts over the sternum and stomach. The pressure waves propagating through the torso were measured with sensors installed in the organs. A previously developed Human Torso Finite Element Model (HTFEM) was used to analyze the amount of tissue displacement during impact and compared with the amount of clay deformation predicted by a validated finite element model. All experiments and simulations were conducted at NIJ Standard test conditions. RESULTS: When normalized by the response at the lowest threat level (Level I), the clay deformations for the higher levels are relatively constant and range from 2.3 to 2.7 times that of the base threat level. However, the pressures in the HSTM increase with each test level and range from three to seven times greater than Level I depending on the organ. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the abilities of the HSTM to discriminate between threat levels, impact conditions, and impact locations. The HTFEM and HSTM are capable of realizing pressure and displacement differences because of the level of protection, surrounding tissue, and proximity to the impact point. The results of this research provide insight into the transfer of energy and pressure wave propagation during ballistic impacts using a physical surrogate and computational model of the human torso.


Subject(s)
Forensic Ballistics , Protective Clothing , Thoracic Injuries/physiopathology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stress, Mechanical , Thoracic Injuries/prevention & control , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/prevention & control
4.
J Trauma ; 62(5): 1127-33, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17495712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess the possibility of injury as a result of behind armor blunt trauma (BABT), a study was undertaken to determine the conditions necessary to produce the 44-mm clay deformation as set forth in the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Standard 0101.04. These energy levels were then applied to a three-dimensional Human Torso Finite Element Model (HTFEM) with soft armor vest. An examination will be made of tissue stresses to determine the effects of the increased kinetic energy levels on the probability of injury. METHODS: A clay finite element model (CFEM) was created with a material model that required nonlinear properties for clay. To determine these properties empirically, the results from the CFEM were matched with experimental drop tests. A soft armor vest was modeled over the clay to create a vest over clay block finite element model (VCFEM) and empirical methods were again used to obtain material properties for the vest from experimental ballistic testing. Once the properties for the vest and clay had been obtained, the kinetic energy required to produce a 44-mm deformation in the VCFEM was determined through ballistic testing. The resulting kinetic energy was then used in the HTFEM to evaluate the probability of BABT. RESULTS: The VCFEM, with determined clay and vest material properties, was exercised with the equivalent of a 9-mm (8-gm) projectile at various impact velocities. The 44-mm clay deformation was produced with a velocity of 785 m/s. This impact condition (9-mm projectile at 785 m/s) was used in ballistic exercises of the HTFEM, which was modeled with high-strain rate human tissue properties for the organs. The impact zones were over the sternum anterior to T6 and over the liver. The principal stresses in both soft and hard tissue at both locations exceeded the tissue tensile strength. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that although NIJ standard 0101.04 may be a good guide to soft armor failure, it may not be as good a guide in BABT, especially at large projectile kinetic energies. Further studies, both numerical and experimental, are needed to assist in predicting injury using the NIJ standard.


Subject(s)
Finite Element Analysis , Materials Testing/methods , Protective Clothing , Thoracic Injuries/prevention & control , Wounds, Gunshot/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/prevention & control , Elasticity , Forensic Ballistics , Humans , Models, Biological , Protective Clothing/standards , Tensile Strength , Thoracic Injuries/etiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/etiology
5.
J Trauma ; 58(6): 1241-51, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15995477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Standard 0101.04, the maximum deformation a soft armor vest can undergo without penetration is 44 mm. However, this does not take into account the effect of the pressure wave or energy transferred to the organs within the torso due to behind armor blunt trauma (BABT). Therefore, a study was undertaken to develop a finite element model (FEM) to study these effects. METHODS: A finite element model (FEM) of the human thorax; complete with musculoskeletal structure and internal organs (heart, liver, lungs and stomach), intercostal muscle and skin, has been developed in LS-DYNA. A Kevlar vest was modeled on the chest to simulate non-penetrating ballistic impact. RESULTS: Using a projectile modeled with a size and mass equivalent to a 9 mm (124 grain) bullet at 360 and 425 m/s, four impacts were simulated against NIJ Level II and Level IIIa Kevlar vests at the midsternum and right thorax. At the same velocity, the pressures decreased by a factor of 3 and the energy absorbed by the organs decreased by a factor of 6 for the NIJ Level II and Level IIIa vests, respectively. As the projectile velocity increased, the peak pressures increased by a factor of 3 while the energy absorbed by the organs increased by a factor of 4. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting pressure profiles and kinetic energy exhibited by the respective organs indicate this model may be useful in identifying mechanisms of injury as well as organs at an elevated injury risk as a result of BABT.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Finite Element Analysis , Forensic Ballistics , Protective Clothing , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Biophysical Phenomena , Biophysics , Elasticity , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Pressure , Protective Clothing/standards , Risk , Thoracic Injuries/prevention & control , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL