Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Ophthalmol ; 130(8): 980-6, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22491392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine peripapillary choroidal thickness in healthy controls and in patients with glaucoma who have focal, diffuse, and sclerotic optic disc damage. METHODS: Healthy controls (n=92) and patients with glaucoma who have focal (n=34), diffuse (n=35), and sclerotic (n=34) optic disc damage were imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (12° circular scan protocol centered on optic nerve head). Peripapillary choroidal thickness was measured as the distance between the automatically segmented retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane and the manually outlined interface between the posterior choroid and the anterior border of the sclera in eyes in which the anterior scleral border was visible over more than 85% of the scan circumference. RESULTS: The anterior scleral border was visible in 76 controls (83%) and 89 patients (86%). Peripapillary choroidal thickness in healthy controls decreased linearly with age (-11 µm/decade; P.001; r2=0.16), with a predicted value of 137 µm at age 70 years (95% prediction interval, 62-212 µm). While this value was similar in patients with focal and diffuse optic disc damage (126 and 130 µm, respectively; P=.22 compared with controls), it was approximately 30% lower in patients with sclerotic optic disc damage (96 µm; P.001 compared with controls). CONCLUSIONS: The peripapillary choroid of patients with glaucoma who have sclerotic optic disc damage was approximately 25% to 30% thinner compared with that in patients with focal and diffuse optic disc damage and with that in healthy controls. The role of the choroid in the pathophysiology of sclerotic glaucomatous optic disc damage needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Choroid/pathology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Optic Disk/pathology , Optic Nerve Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Choroid/anatomy & histology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/classification , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Optic Nerve Diseases/classification , Optic Nerve Diseases/physiopathology , Organ Size , Prospective Studies , Sclera/pathology , Sclerosis , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visual Fields/physiology
2.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 47(6): 2739-45, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16723494

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity (CS) Test to the Pelli-Robson CS Chart. METHODS: One eye of 47 normal control subjects, 27 patients with open-angle glaucoma, and 17 with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was tested twice with the Mars test and twice with the Pelli-Robson test, in random order on separate days. In addition, 17 patients undergoing cataract surgery were tested, once before and once after surgery. RESULTS: The mean Mars CS was 1.62 log CS (0.06 SD) for normal subjects aged 22 to 77 years, with significantly lower values in patients with glaucoma or AMD (P<0.001). Mars test-retest 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were +/-0.13, +/-0.19, and +/-0.24 log CS for normal, glaucoma, and AMD, respectively. In comparison, Pelli-Robson test-retest 95% LOA were +/-0.18, +/-0.19, and +/-0.33 log CS. The Spearman correlation between the Mars and Pelli-Robson tests was 0.83 (P<0.001). However, systematic differences were observed, particularly at the upper-normal end of the range, where Mars CS was lower than Pelli-Robson CS. After cataract surgery, Mars and Pelli-Robson effect size statistics were 0.92 and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the Mars test has test-retest reliability equal to or better than the Pelli-Robson test and comparable responsiveness. The strong correlation between the tests provides evidence the Mars test is valid. However, systematic differences indicate normative values are likely to be different for each test. The Mars Letter CS Test is a useful and practical alternative to the Pelli-Robson CS Chart.


Subject(s)
Cataract/physiopathology , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Macular Degeneration/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract Extraction , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Vision Tests/instrumentation , Vision Tests/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...