Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 248, 2019 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375141

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the tissue injury healing response and development of heterotopic ossification (HO) is poorly understood. Here we compare a rat blast model and human traumatized muscle from a blast injury to study the early signatures of osteogenesis and fibrosis during the formation of HO. METHODS: Rat and human tissues were characterized using histology, scanning electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, as well as gene and protein expression analysis. Additionally, animals and humans were assessed radiographically for HO formation following injury. RESULTS: Markers of bone formation were dramatically increased in tissue samples from both humans and rats, and both displayed increased fibroproliferative regions within the injured tissues and elevated expression of markers of tissue fibrosis such as TGF-ß1, Fibronectin, SMAD3 and PAI-1. Markers of inflammation and fibrosis (ACTA, TNFα, BMP1 and BMP3) were elevated at the RNA level in both rat and human samples. By day 42, bone formation in the rat blast model appeared similar in radiographs compared to human patients who progressed to develop post-traumatic HO. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrates that a similar early fibrotic response is evident in both the rat blast model and the human tissues following a traumatic injury and demonstrates the relevance of this animal model for future translational studies.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/metabolism , Muscles/injuries , Ossification, Heterotopic , Animals , Biomarkers/metabolism , Blast Injuries/physiopathology , Bone Development , Disease Models, Animal , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/growth & development , Fibrosis , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Inflammation , Male , Muscles/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Translational Research, Biomedical , Wound Healing , X-Ray Microtomography
2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 477(3): 644-654, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and low-dose irradiation has demonstrated efficacy in preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) after THA and surgical treatment of acetabular fractures, these modalities have not been assessed after traumatic blast amputations where HO is a common complication that can arise in the residual limb. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of indomethacin and irradiation in preventing HO induced by high-energy blast trauma in a rat model. METHODS: Thirty-six Sprague-Dawley rats underwent hind limb blast amputation with a submerged explosive under water followed by irrigation and primary wound closure. One group (n = 12) received oral indomethacin for 10 days starting on postoperative Day 1. Another group (n = 12) received a single dose of 8 Gy irradiation to the residual limb on postoperative Day 3. A control group (n = 12) did not receive either. Wound healing and clinical course were monitored in all animals until euthanasia at 24 weeks. Serial radiographs were taken immediately postoperatively, at 10 days, and every 4 weeks thereafter to monitor the time course of ectopic bone formation until euthanasia. Five independent graders evaluated the 24-week radiographs to quantitatively assess severity and qualitatively assess the pattern of HO using a modified Potter scale from 0 to 3. Assessment of grading reproducibility yielded a Fleiss statistic of 0.41 and 0.37 for severity and type, respectively. By extrapolation from human clinical trials, a minimum clinically important difference in HO severity was empirically determined to be two full grades or progression of absolute grade to the most severe. RESULTS: We found no differences in mean HO severity scores among the three study groups (indomethacin 0.90 ± 0.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.60-1.19]; radiation 1.34 ± 0.59 [95% CI, 0.95-1.74]; control 0.95 ± 0.55 [95% CI, 0.60-1.30]; p = 0.100). For qualitative HO type scores, the radiation group had a higher HO type than both indomethacin and controls, but indomethacin was no different than controls (indomethacin 1.08 ± 0.66 [95% CI, 0.67-1.50]; radiation 1.89 ± 0.76 [95% CI, 1.38-2.40]; control 1.10 ± 0.62 [95% CI, 0.70-1.50]; p = 0.013). The lower bound of the 95% CI on mean severity in the indomethacin group and the upper bound of the radiation group barely spanned a full grade and involved only numeric grades < 2, suggesting that even if a small difference in severity could be detected, it would be less than our a priori-defined minimum clinically important difference and any differences that might be present are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: This work unexpectedly demonstrated that, compared with controls, indomethacin and irradiation provide no effective prophylaxis against HO in the residual limb after high-energy blast amputation in a rat model. Such an observation is contrary to the civilian experience and may be potentially explained by either a different pathogenesis for blast-induced HO or a stimulus that overwhelms conventional regimens used to prevent HO in the civilian population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HO in the residual limb after high-energy traumatic blast amputation will likely require novel approaches for prevention and management.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Blast Injuries/therapy , Indomethacin/pharmacology , Ossification, Heterotopic/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Amputation, Traumatic/etiology , Animals , Blast Injuries/etiology , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnostic imaging , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Time Factors , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wound Healing/radiation effects
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 99(21): 1851-1858, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29088040

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequate irrigation of open musculoskeletal injuries is considered the standard of care to decrease bacterial load and other contaminants. While the benefit of debris removal compared with the risk of further seeding by high-pressure lavage has been studied, the effects of irrigation on muscle have been infrequently reported. Our aim in the present study was to assess relative damage to muscle by pulsatile lavage compared with bulb-syringe irrigation. METHODS: In an animal model of heterotopic ossification, 24 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent hindlimb blast amputation via detonation of a submerged explosive, with subsequent through-the-knee surgical amputation proximal to the zone of injury. All wounds were irrigated and underwent primary closure. In 12 of the animals, pulsatile lavage (20 psi [138 kPa]) was used as the irrigation method, and in the other 12 animals, bulb-syringe irrigation was performed. A third group of 6 rats did not undergo the blast procedure but instead underwent surgical incision into the left thigh muscle followed by pulsatile lavage. Serial radiographs of the animals were made to monitor the formation of soft-tissue radiopaque lesions until euthanasia at 6 months. Image-guided muscle biopsies were performed at 8 weeks and 6 months (at euthanasia) on representative animals from each group. Histological analysis was performed with hematoxylin and eosin, alizarin red, and von Kossa staining on interval biopsy and postmortem specimens. RESULTS: All animals managed with pulsatile lavage, with or without blast injury, developed soft-tissue radiopaque lesions, whereas no animal that had bulb-syringe irrigation developed these lesions (p = 0.001). Five of the 12 animals that underwent blast amputation with pulsatile lavage experienced wound complications, whereas no animal in the other 2 groups experienced wound complications (p = 0.014). Radiopaque lesions appeared approximately 10 days postoperatively, increased in density until approximately 16 weeks, then demonstrated signs of variable regression. Histological analysis of interval biopsy and postmortem specimens demonstrated tissue damage with inflammatory cells, cell death, and dystrophic calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsatile lavage of musculoskeletal wounds can cause irreversible insult to tissue, resulting in myonecrosis and dystrophic calcification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The benefits and offsetting harm of pulsatile lavage (20 psi) should be considered before its routine use in the management of musculoskeletal wounds.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/therapy , Calcinosis/etiology , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Necrosis/etiology , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Animals , Calcinosis/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Hindlimb/injuries , Male , Necrosis/pathology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects
4.
Orthopedics ; 40(3): e460-e464, 2017 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28195609

ABSTRACT

Axillary nerve injury is a risk of the deltopectoral approach to the proximal humerus. The anterior motor branch is potentially vulnerable during subdeltoid dissection. Insertion of the pectoralis major tendon is an easily identifiable landmark on the humerus. This anatomical study explored whether the superior aspect of the pectoralis major tendon is a useful landmark for localizing the anterior motor branch of the axillary nerve as it travels under the lateral and anterior deltoid muscle. A total of 30 fresh-frozen human bilateral cadaveric upper extremities were examined. A deltopectoral approach was used to expose the pectoralis major tendon insertion and the anterior motor branch of the nerve under the deltoid muscle. The distance between the nerve as it crossed the posterolateral humerus and superior border of the pectoralis major tendon was measured. The axillary nerve was a mean 3.2 mm (range, 0-8 mm) distal to the superior border of the pectoralis major tendon insertion. No significant differences were observed in this anatomical relationship with the shoulder in abduction or external rotation. The nerve was not proximal to the superior border of the pectoralis major tendon in any specimen. The superior border of the pectoralis major tendon insertion represents a reliable landmark for the anterior motor branch of the axillary nerve as it travels under the deltoid muscle. The nerve is located at the level of the proximal centimeter of the pectoralis major tendon. Appreciation of this relationship may decrease risk of injury to the nerve when using a deltopectoral approach. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e460-e464.].


Subject(s)
Peripheral Nerves/anatomy & histology , Shoulder/innervation , Tendons/anatomy & histology , Anatomic Landmarks , Cadaver , Deltoid Muscle/anatomy & histology , Dissection , Humans , Humerus/surgery , Pectoralis Muscles , Shoulder/surgery , Shoulder Joint/anatomy & histology , Shoulder Joint/surgery
5.
Orthopedics ; 39(2): e323-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942475

ABSTRACT

During arthroscopic Bankart repair, penetration of suture anchors through the far cortex can compromise the initial biomechanical characteristics of anchor stability and repair integrity. This study compared the placement of suture anchors through a low anterior-inferior rotator interval portal (AI) vs a trans-subscapularis portal to evaluate the rate of anchor perforation as well as biomechanical strength. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders were randomized to an AI or a trans-subscapularis portal for placement of suture anchors at the 3 o'clock and 5:30 positions. The following measurements were obtained: (1) distance from the portal to the cephalic vein; (2) presence and length of anchor penetration through the inferior glenoid; and (3) ultimate failure strength of the anchors. The distance from the portal to the cephalic vein was significantly greater with the AI vs the trans-subscapularis portal across all specimens (29.9 vs 11.2 mm, P<.05). The rate of anchor penetration was significantly increased in the AI group vs the trans-subscapularis group at the 5:30 position (60% vs 10%, P=.014) but not at the 3 o'clock position (P=.33). Mean pullout strength of the anchors at the 5:30 position trended higher in the trans-subscapularis group, but the difference was not significant (132.8 vs 112.6 N, P=.18). The cephalic vein is closer to the trans-subscapularis portal than to the AI, but is at a safe distance. Both the rate and the degree of glenoid suture anchor penetration were lower with the trans-subscapularis portal compared with the AI at the 5:30 position. Placing anchors through the trans-subscapularis portal provides a safe alternative method, with improved positioning of the inferiormost anchor compared with the traditional AI.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Scapula/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Suture Anchors , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Patient Positioning , Rotator Cuff/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...