Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 39(9): 780-785, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27769580

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of single-pass cutting for preparation of ultra-thin (≤120µm) donor cornea grafts in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: All consecutive patients of DSAEK performed using the MORIA One Use microkeratome (MORIA, Antony, France) in between June 2014 and August 2015. Patient and donor central corneal thickness (CTT), microkeratome head, remaining stromal bed thickness (RSBT), number of cut and graft thickness at 1 month and 6 months postoperatively were recorded in this single-center prospective study. RESULTS: The mean preoperative donor graft CCT was 569.0±45.1µm and the mean donor endothelial graft CCT immediately after the cut was 116.5±28.7µm. At 1 month postoperatively, the mean CCT was 102.8±35.9µm. At 6 months, the mean CCT was 89.4±26.2µm. In all eyes, the mean CCT decreased from the post-cut (116.5±28.7µm) to the last visit (89.4±26.2µm) (P<0.01) due to in vivo deturgesence of the graft. We obtained 77.5% ultra-thin DSAEK immediately after the cut, 77.5% at 1 month and 89.8% after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Single-pass technique with the MORIA One Use microkeratome offers safe and reproducible DSAEK tissue preparation and allows achieving ultra-thin DSAEK in 89.8% of cases.


Subject(s)
Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/instrumentation , Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/methods , Endothelium, Corneal/transplantation , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Corneal Pachymetry , Corneal Transplantation/methods , Corneal Transplantation/standards , Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/adverse effects , Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/standards , Female , France , Humans , Male , Microdissection/instrumentation , Microdissection/methods , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen Handling/methods , Visual Acuity
3.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 39(3): 308-14, 2016 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26995077

ABSTRACT

Keratoconus (KC) is a complex disease whose pathophysiology is only partially understood. The priority in management is to halt the progression of corneal deformation as soon as possible in the course of KC disease. Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is at present the only dedicated treatment for this purpose. Its biochemical mechanism of action leads to changes in the viscoelastic properties of the cornea induced by matrix bonding and renewal of keratocytes. The effect of CXL is difficult to quantify when measured in in-vivo conditions because of a lack of consistent tools adapted for clinical practice. Nevertheless, a large amount of evidence has been collected so far confirming the positive action of CXL on corneal structural reinforcement, and numerous studies have demonstrated significant efficacy in halting progression of KC with long-term follow-up. Published studies, however, are of relatively low scientific power given the great heterogeneity of the disease and the numerous associated biases in evaluation. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the consistent evidence of efficacy of CXL and to justify its role in our therapeutic armamentarium for management of progressive KC.


Subject(s)
Cornea/drug effects , Cross-Linking Reagents/therapeutic use , Keratoconus/therapy , Collagen/drug effects , Collagen/metabolism , Humans , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...