Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels after postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze freedom from progression of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients who have received radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer. DESIGN: We assessed the freedom from PSA progression after postoperative radiation therapy and its relationship to several potential prognostic factors during a median follow- up of 43 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty Mayo patients received postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer between January 1988 and April 1993. Radiation therapy was initiated within 6 months after prostatectomy. Radiation doses ranged from 60 to 67 Gy. RESULTS: "Freedom from PSA failure" was defined as the actuarial risk of maintaining a serum PSA level at 0.3 ng/mL or less. The freedom from failure rate was 66% at 3 and 4 years. Prognostic factors significantly associated with an improved freedom from failure were a pre-radiation PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less and no seminal vesicle involvement. A trend toward an improved freedom from failure was noted in patients with low-grade (1 and 2) tumors in comparison with high-grade (3 and 4) tumors. Treatment-related morbidity was minimal. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer seems to provide an improved freedom from PSA failure in comparison with that noted in other series of similar patients treated with radical prostatectomy only.

Radiotherapy for isolated increases in serum prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of radiotherapy in patients with increased serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels 6 months or more after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN: In 27 Mayo Clinic patients, we examined the results of radiotherapy relative to various potentially prognostic factors during a median follow-up of 25 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 27 patients had no nodal involvement at the time of prostatectomy and no clinical evidence of disease, as determined by history, physical examination, a radionuclide bone scan, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, chest roentgenography, complete blood cell counts, and serum chemistry profiles. With use of 10-MV photons and a four-field approach, these patients received irradiation to the prostatic bed (60 to 67 Gy in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions). RESULTS: Levels of PSA initially decreased in 24 of the 27 patients (89%). In 16 of the 27 patients (59%), the PSA level decreased to 0.3 ng/mL or less without hormonal intervention. "Freedom from failure" (defined as the actuarial chance of maintaining a PSA level of 0.3 ng/mL or less) was 58% at 2 years and 48% at 3 years. The response to salvage radiotherapy was more favorable in patients with no tumor spread into the seminal vesicles and those with serum PSA levels of less than 1.1 ng/mL at the beginning of radiotherapy than in those with seminal vesicle involvement or higher PSA levels. In addition, patients who received radiation doses of 64 Gy or more had more favorable responses than did those who received lesser doses. Radiotherapy resulted in no severe toxicity. No patient had clinical evidence of disease at the time of this report. CONCLUSION: Isolated increases in serum PSA after prostatectomy indicate the presence of residual or recurrent disease, and radiotherapy effectively decreases the PSA in approximately half the cases. This result is achieved by eradicating residual or recurrent cancer in the postoperative tumor bed.

Pineal parenchymal tumors. Clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic aspects.

BACKGROUND: Pineal parenchymal tumors are rare; therefore, only limited clinical data regarding their behavior is available. This study was performed to provide further information regarding the pathologic features, clinical behavior, and response to therapy of these tumors. METHODS: This study includes data concerning 30 patients (15 male and 15 female patients) with pineal parenchymal tumors (PPT) diagnosed between 1939 and 1991. Based on gross and microscopic features, tumors were divided into four groups: pineocytomas (9); PPT with intermediate differentiation (4); mixed PPT exhibiting elements of both pineocytoma and pineoblastoma (2); and pineoblastomas (15). At the time of diagnosis, four patients had evidence of spinal seeding (two with pineoblastoma, two with PPT with intermediate differentiation). Twenty-two patients received radiation therapy (RT): 6 were treated to local fields, 7 to the whole brain, and 9 to the craniospinal axis. RESULTS: For patients who received RT and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months, local failure occurred in one of four patients with pineocytomas, zero of four patients with PPT with intermediate differentiation, one of two with mixed PPT, and four of nine (44%) with pineoblastomas. In patients receiving > or = 50 Gy to the primary tumor, 0 of 12 had local failure compared with 6 of 7 (86%) patients receiving lesser doses. Leptomeningeal failure occurred in zero of four patients with pineocytomas, zero of four patients with PPT with intermediate differentiation, one of two with mixed PPT, and four of nine with pineoblastomas. All leptomeningeal failures occurred in patients with persistent primary tumor. Of the patients with seeding tumors (PPT other than pineocytomas) one of seven (14%) developed leptomeningeal failure when treated with craniospinal irradiation, compared with four of eight (50%) treated to lesser volumes. The projected 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of patients with pineocytomas were 100%, 100%, and 67%, and were 88%, 78%, and 58% for those with the other forms of PPT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RT recommendations are described in detail and include the use of doses of > or = 50 Gy to areas of gross disease and the administration of craniospinal irradiation in patients with tumors prone to seeding. Surgical, chemotherapeutic, and pathologic considerations are discussed.

Patterns of failure in grossly resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant irradiation +/- 5 fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: Analyze patterns of failure, survival, and tolerance in patients with totally resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with adjuvant irradiation alone or combined with chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 29 patients treated with radiotherapy following curative resection of pancreas cancer at the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two (76%) patients underwent a subtotal pancreatectomy (Whipple procedure), six (21%) a total pancreatectomy, and one (3.5%) a distal pancreatectomy. Twenty-six (90%) had lesions located in the head of the pancreas and three (10%) were located either in the body or tail. Twelve (41%) of the tumors were histologic Grade 3, 15 (52%) Grade 2, and two Grade 1. Contiguous invasion of adjacent tissues or organs was found in fifteen patients (52%) and seventeen (59%) had lymph node involvement. Greater than 75% of patients received more than 45 Gy, with a median dose of 54 Gy, and twenty-seven (93%) patients received concomitant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median survival was 22.8 months and the 2-year survival 48%. When survival was compared with that achieved with surgery alone in our institution, data suggested a doubling in both median and long-term survival with the addition of adjuvant treatment. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced tumor relapse with seventeen of 29 (59%) developing either liver metastases or peritoneal spread. In three patients, tumors recurred locally; one of one with microscopic residual disease after resection and two of 28 (7%) with negative margins (one of the two was treated with inadequate radiation portals). Patients tolerated adjuvant treatment with minimal acute toxicity consisting mostly of vomiting or nausea which, were controlled with medication in all patients. Chronic toxicity was acceptable; while 5 of 29 (17%) developed some form of possible treatment related complication, only one patient (3.5%) developed a small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate data in previous studies which have shown a survival benefit when adjuvant irradiation plus 5-fluorouracil is used in patients with completely resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The patterns of failure indicate that post-operative adjuvant treatment can effectively control disease locally but that future survival improvements will be achieved only by reducing the incidence of liver and peritoneal metastases.

Low-versus high-energy photon beams in radiotherapy for lung cancer.

This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of lung cancer patients who were treated with either 4-MV or 10-MV photons. From October 1979 through December 1982, 126 patients with locally advanced, unresectable or medically inoperable, nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer were treated in a prospective trial in which they were randomly assigned to one of three chemotherapy combinations and thoracic radiotherapy. The patients were stratified by cell type, extent of operation, age, sex, and status of supraclavicular lymph nodes. All patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 4.8 years. Of the 102 evaluable patients, 98 were treated with either 4-MV or 10-MV photons (49 patients in each group). Outcomes examined included best primary tumor response, time to first local (in-field) recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. No significant differences were detected between the patients treated with 4-MV or 10-MV photons for several important prognostic and treatment factors or for any of the study outcomes, including first local (in-field) recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. For the group of 98 patients treated with either 4-MV or 10-MV photons, the estimated 2-year freedom from first local (in-field) recurrence was 47.7%. The estimated 2-year disease-free and overall survivals were 21.6% and 28.6%, respectively.

Results of radiotherapy for chemodectomas.

Between 1974 and 1988, 10 Mayo Clinic patients had unresectable, locally recurrent, or partially resected chemodectomas. Of these 10 tumors, 9 were confirmed pathologically, and 1 was diagnosed clinically. The chemodectoma was located in the jugular bulb in five patients, the middle ear in three, and the carotid body in two. The following symptoms were noted: tinnitus (in eight patients), loss of hearing (in six), hoarseness (in six), dysphagia (in four), pain (in three), and alteration of mental status (in one). Many patients had more than one symptom. Treatment was delivered with megavoltage photons and electrons; total doses ranged from 16.2 to 52 Gy (median, 46 Gy), and the daily doses ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 Gy. Follow-up among the nine survivors ranged from 3 1/2 to 16 years (median, 7 1/2 years). In one patient, the response could not be assessed because the patient died of renal failure 4 months after treatment. All nine assessable patients had decreased symptoms and objective control of the tumor (no evidence of progression of disease). Of the nine assessable patients, four had complete responses, one had a partial response, and four had stable disease. No patient experienced progression of disease after radiotherapy. We conclude that radiotherapy for chemodectomas yields successful results--namely, decreased symptoms and objective control of the tumor.

Analysis of failure after curative irradiation of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.

Thirty-four patients with subtotally resected or unresectable carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts received radiation therapy; a minimum of 45 Gy (external beam) to the tumor and regional lymph nodes +/- 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Seventeen patients received an external beam boost of 5 to 15 Gy to the tumor, and a specialized boost was used in the remaining 17 patients (iridium-192 transcatheter seeds in 10 and intraoperative radiation therapy [IORT] with electrons in seven). The median time to death in all 34 patients was 12 months (range, 4 to 98-months). The only patients who survived longer than 18 months were those either with gross total or subtotal resection before external irradiation (2 of 6) or who received specialized boosts (192Ir, 3 of 10; IORT, 3 of 7). Local failure was documented in 9 of 17 patients who received external beam irradiation alone +/- 5-FU, 3 of 10 patients who received an 192Ir boost, and 2 of 6 patients who received an IORT boost with curative intent.

The results of radiotherapy for isolated elevation of serum PSA levels following radical prostatectomy.

Eleven patients were initially treated for localized prostate cancer with radical retropubic prostatectomy following negative pelvic lymph node dissection. Six or more months after surgery, these patients had elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. No patient had other clinical evidence of disease as determined by history, physical examination, bone scan, computed tomographic scan of the abdomen and pelvis, chest radiograph, complete blood cell count, and serum chemistry profile. These patients received prostate bed irradiation using 10-MV photons and a four-field technique. Doses ranged from 60.0 to 65.8 Gy in 1.8 to 2.0 Gy fractions. Levels of serum PSA were monitored and decreased initially in all treated patients. In two patients, levels of PSA increased after this initial decrease. In 7 of the 11 patients (64%), PSA levels decreased to less than or equal to 0.3 ng/mL at last measurement. Radiotherapy resulted in no severe toxicity. None of the patients had developed clinical evidence of disease at the time of this report. Isolated elevations of serum PSA after prostatectomy reflect residual disease, and radiotherapy appears to effectively decrease the PSA levels in most cases. This effect appears to be accomplished by killing locally residual or recurrent cancer in the postoperative tumor bed.

Radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer in patients with prosthetic hips.

Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer may also have a prosthetic hip. When planning radiotherapy for these patients, one must consider the attenuation of the dose when the beam passes through the prosthetic hip. It is best to avoid administration of radiation to the target through the prosthesis. Example treatment plans are evaluated. The potential advantages and disadvantages of each plan are reviewed.

Prostate cancer: retrograde urethrography to improve treatment planning for radiation therapy.

Thirty men with clinical stage A or B prostate cancer underwent retrograde urethrography at the time of simulation. The inferior edge of the prostate apex was visualized as an abrupt narrowing of the column of contrast material at the urogenital diaphragm. The distance between the line connecting the lower poles of the ischial tuberosities and the site of abrupt narrowing of the column of contrast material (prostate apex) ranged from 0.2 cm to 2.9 cm (median, 1.5 cm). In eight of the 30 (27%) cases, this distance was less than 1.0 cm. In these patients, it would have been inappropriate to place the lower field edge at the bottom of the ischial tuberosities because this would have resulted in an insufficient margin (less than 1.0 cm) below the prostate apex. The authors quantify the percentage of patients who would not be adequately treated if the ischial tuberosities were used as the lower border of the treatment fields. The information obtained at retrograde urethrography can be used to place the inferior border of the treatment fields properly, at least 1.0 cm below the prostate apex.

Results of combination chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy for unresectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

From October 1979 to December 1982, 126 patients with locally advanced unresectable or inoperable Stage II (7 patients), Stage IIIA (81 patients), and Stage IIIB (38 patients) non-small cell carcinoma of the lung were treated in a prospective randomized trial using five cycles of CAP (Cytoxan, Adriamycin, and cisplatin), T-CAP (triazinate plus CAP), or V-CAP (VP-16 plus CAP) chemotherapy with thoracic radiation therapy (TRT). TRT consisted of 40 Gy in 10 fractions (split-course) with cycles 3 and 4 of chemotherapy. The treatment field included the primary tumor, ipsilateral hilum, mediastinum, and ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. All patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 5 years for survivors. The evaluable subgroup consisted of 102 patients who completed TRT. Median and 5-year survivals for the entire group were 14.0 months and 10%, respectively; for the evaluable subgroup, they were 14.8 months and 12%, respectively. There was a trend toward better survival with V-CAP plus TRT than with CAP plus TRT (p = 0.08). Median and 5-year survivals were 16.2 months and 18%, respectively, with V-CAP plus TRT. Of eight prognostic variables analyzed for their association with survival, only Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0,1 versus 2) (p = 0.02) and weight loss (less than or equal to 10% versus greater than 10%) (p = 0.05) were significant. Sex, age, T stage, N stage, overall stage, and histologic type were not significantly associated with survival. Failure analysis revealed 83 patients (81%) with identifiable first failures. The median time to first failure was 9.8 months, and the median survival after first failure was 4.7 months. Failure patterns included local failure alone (19%), local and distant (20%), and distant alone (43%). Nineteen percent of patients had no documented progression. Total failure patterns were local in 39% and distant in 63%. Twenty-three patients (23%) had failure in the brain; they accounted for 31% of all distant failures. In 20 of these patients (20% of all patients), this was the only site of failure. There were eight (8%) initial nodal failures in 96 untreated contralateral supraclavicular fossae. No initial failures were seen in any of 101 untreated contralateral hila. The data suggest the following: (a) Combined treatment with V-CAP and TRT yielded excellent results (median survival, 16.2 months; 5-year survival, 18%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)