Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Vet Sci ; 6: 111, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041315

ABSTRACT

Designed as a new method to facilitate the reintroduction and post-release monitoring of orangutans and other apes, implanted radio-telemetry (IRT) was developed and first deployed in 2009. Since that time, it has been necessary to collate and review information on its uptake and general efficacy to inform its ongoing development and that of other emerging tracking technologies. We present here technical specifications and the surgical procedure used to implant miniaturized radio transmitters, as well as a formal testing procedure for measuring detectable transmission distances of implanted devices. Feedback from IRT practitioners (veterinarians and field managers) was gathered through questionnaires and is also presented. To date, IRT has been used in at least 250 individual animals (mainly orangutans) from four species of ape in both Asia and Africa. Median surgical and wound healing times were 30 min and 15 days, respectively, with implants needing to be removed on at least 36 separate occasions. Confirmed failures within the first year of operation were 18.1%, while longer distances were reported from positions of higher elevation relative to the focal animal. IRT has been a transformational technology in facilitating the relocation of apes after their release, resulting in much larger amounts of post-release data collection than ever before. It is crucial however, that implant casings are strengthened to prevent the requirement for recapture and removal surgeries, especially for gradually adapting apes. As with all emerging technological solutions, IRT carries with it inherent risk, especially so due to the requirement for subcutaneous implantation. These risks must, however, be balanced with the realities of releasing an animal with no means of relocation, as has historically been, and is still, the case with orangutans and gorillas.

2.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci ; 14(1): 75-84, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21191849

ABSTRACT

This review evaluates the use of water as a tool for enriching the environments of macaques (Macaca sp.) in captivity. Many macaque species are known to swim and forage in water in the wild, and in-situ reports suggest that access to water promotes activity and cultural behavior. Yet, there is a relative dearth of information on water enrichment, covering only a small number of macaque species in both laboratory and zoo settings. Previous studies in captivity report high levels of usage of water enrichment as well as further behavioral benefits, including increases in play, exploratory behavior, and tool use. Subsequently, there is a clear need for more research on the potential benefits of water enrichment for both macaques and other primate species, especially given that small water troughs and pools provide an inexpensive method for enriching nonhuman primate lives in captivity.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Behavior, Animal , Macaca/psychology , Water , Animals , Animals, Zoo , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Ecosystem , Macaca/physiology , Play and Playthings , Swimming
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...