Pulmonary embolus in patients with COVID-19: an Australian perspective.

Pulmonary embolus (PE) is a known complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The diagnosis of PE in our hospitalised patients with COVID-19 correlated with more severe disease and occurred despite the use of routine thromboprophylaxis. Higher D-dimers were seen on admission in patients who developed PE and rose at PE diagnosis, suggesting a role for D-dimer in risk stratification.

Optimal oral cyclosporin dosing with concomitant posaconazole post allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Cyclosporin is an immunosuppressive agent in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and its metabolism is strongly affected by concomitant drugs, including posaconazole which is now extensively used as anti-fungal prophylaxis post-allograft. We undertook a retrospective audit of 29 patients undergoing their first allograft who were receiving posaconazole at the time of transition from intravenous to oral cyclosporin. This group had a median initial oral cyclosporin dose of 2.58 mg/kg bd (range 1.75-3.95) and high incidence of cyclosporin-related toxicity was noted, requiring significant dose reductions such that by day 60 the media dose was 1.60 mg/kg bd (range 0.86-3.33). We subsequently amended our dosing protocol and analyzed a further 20 patients specifying an initial oral cyclosporin dose of 2.25 mg/kg bd and found this had little impact on toxicity or requirement for dose reductions. Starting doses of no greater than 2 mg/kg bd appear optimal to prevent toxicity in allograft recipients receiving concomitant posaconazole.

Attitudes of patients with metastatic cancer towards research biopsies.

AIM: To evaluate the attitudes of patients with different cancers towards research biopsies outside a clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cancer completed a questionnaire that assessed patients' willingness to consider research biopsies. Research biopsies were divided into two groups: biopsies performed as stand-alone procedures (research purposes only biopsy, RPOB) or performed during a clinically indicated biopsy (additional pass biopsy, APB). Factors analyzed included biopsy timing, biopsy site, sociodemographic information and information about prior trial participation. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted using random-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients with cancer (40 melanoma, 37 colorectal, 32 breast, 30 lung, 26 prostate) completed the questionnaire. Patients with melanoma demonstrated the greatest willingness to consider a research biopsy compared to patients with other cancer types (P < 0.05). Patients' ethnicity, time since previous biopsies, time since metastatic diagnosis, and previous trial enrolment were all statistically significant for willingness to consider a research biopsy on univariate analysis. When adjusting for statistically significant variables on univariate analysis, the odds of patients considering APBs were 14.6 times greater than RPOBs (P < 0.0001). Patients were also more willing to consider having blood or skin taken for research purposes (P < 0.0001) compared to liver and bone biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer show a greater willingness to consider APBs compared to RPOBs, and biopsies performed at less invasive body sites. There are differences in the attitudes of patients with different cancers towards research biopsies. Further research addressing motivations and barriers to research biopsies should be considered to increase the availability of this important resource.