Enhanced Stress Resilience Training for UK Surgical Trainees; Effect and Evolution Evaluated.

INTRODUCTION: Core Surgical Training (CST) programs are associated with high burnout. This study aimed to assess the influence of Enhanced Stress Resilience Training (ESRT) over a 2-year period in a single UK Statutory Education Body. METHOD: CSTs participated in 5-weeks of formal ESRT to address work stressors. The primary outcome measure was career progression related to curriculum metrics and National Training Number (NTN) appointment. Secondary measures related to burnout using validated psychological inventories. RESULTS: Of 42 CSTs, 13 engaged fully with ESRT (31.0%; male 8, female 5, median age 28 year.), 11 engaged partially, and 18 did not. ESRT engagement was associated with better NTN appointment (ESRT 8/13 (61.5%) vs. not 1/18 (5.6%), p = 0.025), less burnout [aMBI; mean 5.14 (SD ± 2.35) vs. 3.14 (±2.25), F 6.637, p = 0.002, ηp2=0.167], less stress [PSS-10; 19.22 (±5.91) vs. 15.79 (±5.47), F 8.740, p < 0.001, ηp2=0.200], but more mindfulness [CAMS-R; 19.22 (±5.91) vs. 20.57 (±2.93), F 3.201, p = 0.047, ηp2=0.084]. On multivariable analysis, Improving Surgical Training (run-through CST) program (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.42-28.41, p = 0.022), MRCS pass (OR 17.128 (95% CI 1.48-197.11, p = 0.023) and ESRT engagement (OR 13.249, 95% CI 2.08-84.58, p = 0.006) were independently associated with NTN success. DISCUSSION: ESRT was associated with less stress and burnout, better mindfulness, and most importantly 13-fold better career progression.

A retrospective cohort study of differential attainment, COVID and chaos: taking the difference out of a terrible trinity.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate core surgical training (CST) differential attainment related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), gender and ethnicity. The hypothesis was that COVID-19 adversely influenced CST outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 271 anonymised CST records was undertaken at a UK Statutory Education Body. Primary effect measures were Annual Review of Competency Progression Outcome (ARCPO), Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination pass and Higher Surgical Training National Training Number (NTN) appointment. Data were collected prospectively at ARCP and analysed with non-parametric statistical methods in SPSS. RESULTS: CSTs numbering 138 completed training pre-COVID and 133 peri-COVID. ARCPO 1, 2 and 6 were 71.9% pre-COVID versus 74.4% peri-COVID ( P =0.844). MRCS pass rates were 69.6% pre-COVID versus 71.1% peri-COVID ( P =0.968), but NTN appointment rates diminished (pre-COVID 47.4% vs. peri-COVID 36.9%, P =0.324); none of the above varied by gender or ethnicity. Multivariable analyses by three models revealed: ARCPO was associated with gender [m:f 1:0.87, odds ratio (OR) 0.53, P =0.043] and CST theme (Plastics vs. General OR 16.82, P =0.007); MRCS pass with theme (Plastics vs. General OR 8.97, P =0.004); NTN with the Improving Surgical Training run-through programme (OR 5.00, P <0.001). Programme retention improved peri-COVID (OR 0.20, P =0.014) with pan University Hospital rotations performing better than Mixed or District General-only rotations (OR 6.63, P =0.018). CONCLUSION: Differential attainment profiles varied 17-fold, yet COVID-19 did not influence ARCPO or MRCS pass rates. NTN appointment fell by one-fifth peri-COVID, but overall training outcome metrics remained robust despite the existential threat.

Biosensors, Biomarkers and Biometrics: a Bootcamp Perspective.

Introduction: Competitive physical performance is routinely monitored by wearable technology (biosensors), yet professional healthcare is not, despite high prevalence of trainee stress and burnout, notwithstanding the corresponding risk to patient safety. This study aimed to document the physiological stress response of UK Core Surgical Trainees (CSTs) during simulation training. Methods: CSTs (n=20, 10 male) were fitted with Vital Scout Wellness Monitors (VivaLNK, Campbell, California, USA) for an intensive 3-day training bootcamp. In addition to physiological parameters, CST demographics, event diaries and Maslach Burnout Inventory scores were recorded prospectively during exposure to three scenarios: interactive lectures, clinical skills simulation and non-technical (communication) training. Results: Baseline heart rate (BHR, 60 bpm (range 39-81 bpm)) and baseline respiratory rate (14/min (11-18/min)) varied considerably and did not correlate (rho 0.076, p=0.772). BHR was associated with weekly exercise performed (66 bpm (<1 hour) vs 43 bpm (>5 hour), rho -0.663, p=0.004). Trainee response (standardised median heart rate vs BHR) revealed heart rate was related proportionately to lectures (71 bpm, p<0.001), non-technical skills training (79 bpm, p<0.001) and clinical skills simulation (88 bpm, p<0.001). Respiratory rate responded similarly (p<0.001 in each case). Heart rate during clinical skills simulation was associated with emotional exhaustion (rho 0.493, p=0.044), but maximum heart rate was unrelated to CSTs' perceived peak stressors. Discussion: Stress response, as derived from positive sympathetic heart rate drive varied over two-fold, with a direct implication on oxygen uptake and energy expenditure, and highlighting the daily physical demands placed upon clinicians.

Consumer-grade biosensor validation for examining stress in healthcare professionals.

INTRODUCTION: A high prevalence of stress and burnout has been reported among healthcare professionals; however, the current tools utilized to quantify such metrics are not in keeping with doctors' busy lifestyles, and moreover do not comply with infection prevention policies. Given that increased stress can subsequently impact both the healthcare profession and the patient in care, this study aimed to assess the validity of a wearable biosensor to monitor and manage stress experienced by healthcare professionals. METHODS: In all, 12 healthy, male volunteers completed an incremental exercise protocol to volitional exhaustion, which aimed to induce physiological stress in a graded manner. A wearable consumer-grade biosensor (Vital Scout, VivaLNK, Inc.) was used to measure stress, energy expenditure, respiration rate, and activity throughout the exercise protocol. These variables were validated against online breath-by-breath analysis (MedGraphics Ultima Series). RESULTS: When compared against online "gold standard" measurements, the Vital Scout biosensor demonstrated a high level of accuracy to measure energy expenditure (r = .776, p < .001) and respiration rate (r = .744, p < .001). The V˙O2 increase observed during the incremental exercise test was associated with the Vital Scout biosensor's measurement of activity (r = .777, p < .001). In contrast, there was a poor relationship between the changes in V˙O2 and the Vital Scout biosensor's ability to detect stress (r = -.195, p = .013). CONCLUSION: The Vital Scout biosensor provided an accurate assessment of energy expenditure and respiration when compared to the "gold standard" assessment of these parameters. Biosensors have the potential to measure stress and deserve further research in the peri-hospital environment.

Stress and Burnout in Training; Requiem for the Surgical Dream.

OBJECTIVE: Burnout among trainee doctors is common with as many as two-thirds reporting poor health. This study aimed to assess burnout in a cohort of UK core and higher general surgical trainees. DESIGN: The Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel was distributed to 158 surgical trainees to evaluate emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (PA). High EE (≥27) and DP (≥10), low PA (≤33) scores were taken to indicate burnout. SETTING: A single UK (Wales) Deanery. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred responses were received; 65 core surgical trainees, 31 Higher Surgical Trainees (HST), and 4 not specified. RESULTS: Median EE, DP, and PA scores were 22.0 (range 2-50), 7.5 (0-25), and 36.0 (19-47), respectively. High burnout by domain was: EE (n = 33), DP (n = 39), PA (n = 34), with 59% of trainees demonstrating burnout in ≥1 one domain, with strong interdomain correlation (EE:DP r = 0.351, p < 0.001; EE:PA r = -0.455, p < 0.001; DP:PA r = -0.446, p < 0.001). Female gender (p = 0.020), core surgical training grade (p = 0.012), and being childless (p = 0.033) were independently associated with higher levels of EE; whereas HST grade (p = 0.007), age >30 years (p = 0.010), married/partner status (p = 0.001), and parenthood (p = 0.015), were associated with lower levels of burnout with regard to DP. Binary logistic regression revealed lower burnout in all domains to be associated with HST status (hazard ratio 0.116, 95% confidence interval 0.014-0.980, p = 0.048) and male gender (hazard ratio 4.365, (1.246-15.293), p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Burnout among surgical trainees was common in at least 1 Maslach Burnout Inventory domain. Urgent counter measures are required to protect the health and wellbeing of trainees at risk, which ought to be associated with commensurate improvement in patient safety.

Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery Curriculum Concordance: An Operative Learning Curve Trajectory Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Certification of completion of training in Trauma and Orthopedic (T&O) surgery in the UK requires the demonstration of operative competence in 12 index procedures, achieved through attaining a level 4 consultant-validated procedure-based assessment (PBA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the trajectory of operative learning curves related to PBA performance with respect to operative caseload and training time. DESIGN: Logbook data from consecutive 24 higher T&O trainees were compared with PBA evaluations to determine the relationship between PBA level, operative experience, training time, and indicative numbers. Learning curve gradients were calculated using trigonometry related to operative experience and training time. SETTING: A higher surgical orthopedic training program serving a single UK (Wales) Deanery. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four consecutive higher T&O surgery trainees. RESULTS: Median caseload to achieve level 4 competences ranged from 9 (interquartile range 6-12) for tension band wiring (olecranon or patella) to 101 (61-127) for arthroscopy, with significant variation between all 12 procedures (p < 0.001). Median number of PBAs to reach level 4 competences was 4 (2-6) with significant variation between procedures (p < 0.001). Median learning curve gradients to achieve level 4 competence for tension band wiring were 68.2° and 33.7° by caseload and training time respectively, compared with 12.2° and 45° for arthroscopy, with significant learning curve variation for all procedures related to caseload between first level 3 and first level 4 PBA (p < 0.001). Competence ratios were <1 (median 0.99, range 0.70-2.53) for 6 of the 12 indicative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Significant learning curve trajectory variance was observed, with discrepancies between indicative operative numbers and the point at which competence was judged achieved. Numbers of index operations to achieve certification of completion of training warrant further examination.

Relative Value of Adapted Novel Bibliometrics in Evaluating Surgical Academic Impact and Reach.

BACKGROUND: The Hirsch index, often used to assess research impact, suffers from questionable validity within the context of General Surgery, and consequently adapted bibliometrics and altmetrics have emerged, including the r-index, m-index, g-index and i10-index. This study aimed to assess the relative value of these novel bibliometrics in a single UK Deanery General Surgical Consultant cohort. METHOD: Five indices (h, r, m, g and i10) and altmetric scores (AS) were calculated for 151 general surgical consultants in a UK Deanery. Indices and AS were calculated from publication data via the Scopus search engine with assessment of construct validity and reliability. RESULTS: The median number of publications, h-index, r-index, m-index, g-index and i10-index were 13 (range 0-389), 5 (range 0-63), 5.2 (range 0-64.8), 0.33 (range 0-1.5), 10 (range 0-125) and 4 (range 0-245), respectively. Correlation coefficients of r-index, m-index, g-index and i10-index with h-index were 0.913 (p < 0.001), 0.716 (p < 0.001), 0.961 (p < 0.001) and 0.939 (p < 0.001), respectively. Significant variance was observed when the cohort was ranked by individual bibliometric measures; the median ranking shifts were: r-index - 2 (- 46 to + 23); m-index - 6.5 (- 53 to + 22); g-index - 0.5 (- 24 to + 13); and i10-index 0 (- 8 to + 11), respectively (p < 0.001). The median altmetric score and AS index were 0 (range 0-225.5) and 1 (range 0-10), respectively; AS index correlated strongly with h-index (correlation coefficient 0.390, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adapted bibliometric indices appear to be equally valid measures of evaluating academic productivity, impact and reach.