Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 40(3): 274-5, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27028403

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the Act-Belong-Commit mental health promotion campaign on people with a diagnosed mental illness or who had sought professional help for a mental health problem in the previous 12 months. METHOD: In 2013 and 2014, 1,200 adults in Western Australia were interviewed by telephone. The questionnaire measured campaign reach, impact on beliefs about mental health and mental illness and behavioural impact. RESULTS: Campaign impact on changing the way respondents thought about mental health was significantly higher among those with a mental illness or who had sought help (41.4% vs 24.2%; p<0.001), as was doing something for their mental health as a result of their exposure to the campaign (20.5% vs 8.7%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The campaign appears to empower people with a mental illness or who recently sought help to take steps of their own to enhance their mental health.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Mental Disorders/psychology , Female , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health , Program Evaluation , Western Australia
2.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 9(6): e1003105, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23818840

ABSTRACT

The characteristics of the host contact network over which a pathogen is transmitted affect both epidemic spread and the projected effectiveness of control strategies. Given the importance of understanding these contact networks, it is unfortunate that they are very difficult to measure directly. This challenge has led to an interest in methods to infer information about host contact networks from pathogen phylogenies, because in shaping a pathogen's opportunities for reproduction, contact networks also shape pathogen evolution. Host networks influence pathogen phylogenies both directly, through governing opportunities for evolution, and indirectly by changing the prevalence and incidence. Here, we aim to separate these two effects by comparing pathogen evolution on different host networks that share similar epidemic trajectories. This approach allows use to examine the direct effects of network structure on pathogen phylogenies, largely controlling for confounding differences arising from population dynamics. We find that networks with more heterogeneous degree distributions yield pathogen phylogenies with more variable cluster numbers, smaller mean cluster sizes, shorter mean branch lengths, and somewhat higher tree imbalance than networks with relatively homogeneous degree distributions. However, in particular for dynamic networks, we find that these direct effects are relatively modest. These findings suggest that the role of the epidemic trajectory, the dynamics of the network and the inherent variability of metrics such as cluster size must each be taken into account when trying to use pathogen phylogenies to understand characteristics about the underlying host contact network.


Subject(s)
Microbiota , Phylogeny , Biological Evolution , Cluster Analysis
3.
Theor Popul Biol ; 81(2): 89-96, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22248701

ABSTRACT

Sexually transmitted pathogens persist in populations despite the availability of biomedical interventions and knowledge of behavioural changes that would reduce individual-level risk. While behavioural risk factors are shared between many sexually transmitted infections, the prevalence of these diseases across different risk groups varies. Understanding this heterogeneity and identifying better control strategies depends on an improved understanding of the complex social contact networks over which pathogens spread. To date, most efforts to study the impact of sexual network structure on disease dynamics have focused on static networks. However, the interaction between the dynamics of partnership formation and dissolution and the dynamics of transmission plays a role, both in restricting the effective network accessible to the pathogen, and in modulating the transmission dynamics. We present a simple method to simulate dynamical networks of sexual partnerships. We inform the model using survey data on sexual attitudes and lifestyles, and investigate how the duration of infectiousness changes the effective contact network over which disease may spread. We then simulate several control strategies: screening, vaccination and behavioural interventions. Previous theory and research has advanced the importance of core groups for spread and control of STD. Our work is consistent with the importance of core groups, but extends this idea to consider how the duration of infectiousness associated with a particular pathogen interacts with host behaviours to define these high risk subpopulations. Characteristics of the parts of the network accessible to the pathogen, which represent the network structure of sexual contacts from the "point of view" of the pathogen, are substantially different from those of the network as a whole. The pathogen itself plays an important role in determining this effective network structure; specifically, we find that if the pathogen's duration of infectiousness is short, infection is more concentrated in high-activity, high-concurrency individuals even when all other factors are held constant. Widespread screening programmes would be enhanced by follow-up interventions targeting higher-risk individuals, because screening shortens the expected duration of infectiousness and causes a greater relative decrease in prevalence among lower-activity than in higher-activity individuals. Even for pathogens with longer durations of infectiousness, our findings suggest that targeting vaccination and behavioural interventions towards high-activity individuals provides comparable benefits to population-wide interventions.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/methods , Sexuality , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Social Support , Algorithms , Epidemiologic Methods , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Risk Factors , Risk-Taking , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
4.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 17(2): 141-5, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21157312

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The European Clinical Trials Directive was issued in 2001 and aimed to simplify and harmonize the regulatory framework of clinical trials throughout Europe, thus stimulating European research. However, significant complexity and inconsistency remains due to disparate interpretation by European Union member states, creating substantial financial and administrative challenges for investigators. RECENT FINDINGS: Critical care research has been particularly impacted by the Directive due to variable and often restrictive consenting procedures for incapacitated patients. Furthermore, the absence of a waiver of consent threatened to put an end to emergency research in Europe. Approval procedures by ethics committees are equally inconsistent, particularly those relating to provision of a single opinion for multicentre trials. This complexity as well as a general increase in administrative and financial burden following the Directive has been widely shown to cause a reduction in clinical trial activity in Europe. SUMMARY: Various changes to the Directive have been called for by clinical researchers from diverse disciplines, including a risk-based approach to ethical approval, insurance, and monitoring; clarification of terms; and a general simplification of administrative procedures to reduce complexity and cost. This widespread advocacy has led to a planned revision of the Directive in 2011.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Government Regulation , Humans
5.
J Med Ethics ; 36(6): 322-5, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20530086

ABSTRACT

The European Clinical Trials Directive was issued in 2001 and aimed to simplify and harmonise the regulatory framework of clinical trials throughout Europe, thus stimulating European research. However, significant complexity and inconsistency remains due to disparate interpretation by EU member states. Critical care research has been particularly impacted due to variable and often restrictive consenting procedures for incapacitated subjects, with some countries requiring a court-appointed representative, while others recognise consent from family members and occasionally professional representatives. Furthermore, the absence of a waiver of consent threatened to put an end to emergency research in Europe and was met with varied responses. Approval procedures by ethics committees are equally inconsistent, particularly those relating to provision of a single opinion for multi-centre trials. Although evidence is somewhat mixed, this complexity as well as a general increase in administrative and financial burden following the Directive has been shown to cause a reduction in clinical trial activity in Europe, particularly academic trials. We aim to clarify some of these inconsistent procedures, particularly those relating to informed consent of incapacitated subjects, as well as discussing some general weaknesses and possible improvements of the Directive ahead of its planned revision in 2011.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Critical Care , Emergency Medicine , Informed Consent/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Ethics Committees, Research , Europe , European Union/organization & administration , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...