Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Euro Surveill ; 21(36)2016 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631156

ABSTRACT

Since the first documented autochthonous transmission of chikungunya virus in the Caribbean island of Saint Martin in 2013, the infection has been reported within the Caribbean region as well as North, Central and South America. The risk of autochthonous transmission of chikungunya virus becoming established in Spain may be elevated due to the large numbers of travellers returning to Spain from countries affected by the 2013 epidemic in the Caribbean and South America, as well as the existence of the Aedes albopictus vector in certain parts of Spain. We retrospectively analysed the laboratory diagnostic database of the National Centre for Microbiology, Institute of Health Carlos III (CNM-ISCIII) from 2008 to 2014. During the study period, 264 confirmed cases, of 1,371 suspected cases, were diagnosed at the CNM-ISCIII. In 2014 alone, there were 234 confirmed cases. The highest number of confirmed cases were reported from the Dominican Republic (n = 136), Venezuela (n = 30) and Haiti (n = 11). Six cases were viraemic in areas of Spain where the vector is present. This report highlights the need for integrated active case and vector surveillance in Spain and other parts of Europe where chikungunya virus may be introduced by returning travellers.


Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Chikungunya virus/isolation & purification , Fever/etiology , Travel , Aedes/virology , Animals , Chikungunya Fever/epidemiology , Chikungunya Fever/virology , Chikungunya virus/genetics , Disease Outbreaks , Dominican Republic , Female , Haiti , Humans , Insect Vectors/virology , Male , RNA, Viral , Retrospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sentinel Surveillance , Spain/epidemiology , Venezuela
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 86(6): 363-377, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18004181

ABSTRACT

Enterococci are the third leading cause of infectious endocarditis, and despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, the mortality of enterococcal endocarditis has not changed in recent decades. Although variables such as advanced age, cardiac failure, and brain emboli have been recognized as risk factors for mortality, cooperative multi-institutional studies have not assessed the role of other variables, such as nosocomial acquisition of infection, the presence of comorbidities, or the changing antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci, as factors determining prognosis.We conducted the current study to determine the risk factors for mortality in patients with enterococcal endocarditis in a single institution. We reviewed 47 consecutive episodes of enterococcal endocarditis in 44 patients diagnosed according to the modified Duke criteria from a retrospective cohort study of cases of infectious endocarditis. The main outcome measure was inhospital mortality. We applied stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for mortality.Predisposing heart conditions were observed in 86.3% of patients, and 17 had prosthetic valve endocarditis. A portal of entry was suspected or determined in 38.2%; the genitourinary tract was the most common source of the infection (29.7%). Comorbidities were present in 52.2% of cases. Twelve episodes (25.5%) were acquired during hospitalization. Only 3 isolates of Enterococcus faecalis were highly resistant to gentamicin. Eighteen patients (40.9%) needed valve replacement due to cardiac failure or relapse. Comparing cases of native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis, we found no differences regarding complications, the need for surgical treatment, or mortality. Eight of 44 (18%) episodes were fatal. Age over 70 years (p = 0.05), heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.25; p = 0.001), presence of 1 or more comorbidities (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.11-9.39; p = 0.02), and nosocomial acquisition (OR, 8.05; 95% CI, 1.50-43.2; p = 0.01) were associated with mortality. In the multivariate analysis, only nosocomial acquisition increased the risk of mortality. In patients with enterococcal endocarditis, nosocomial acquisition of infection is an important factor determining outcome. As the incidence of bacteremia and the population of elderly people at risk continue to grow, the hazard of acquiring nosocomial enterococcal endocarditis may increase; hence, major emphasis must be put on prevention.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Enterococcus , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Heart Valve Diseases/microbiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/etiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/mortality , Enterococcus faecalis , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/drug therapy , Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...