Usefulness of omalizumab in rapid drug desensitization in patients with severe anaphylaxis induced by carboplatin: open questions

No disponible

[Anaphylaxis after carrying out prick tests]. / Anafilaxia tras realización de pruebas cutáneas en prick.

The skin prick test (SPT) is a simple and fast method used routinely in allergology practice. Systemic reactions have been described with this technique on few occasions. We are presenting a case of anaphylaxis with hemodynamic consequences after carrying out skin prick test with a cat dander extract. A 23 years old female who suffered rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma following contact with cats. We performed skin prick test with a battery of the usual inhalants. Twenty minutes after carrying out the prick test the patient showed intense ocular irritation and reddening followed by dysphonia and a feeling of pharyngeal occupation. Although skin prick test is a safe diagnostic approach, it should be performed only in places equipped to treat anaphylaxis and for trained specialists .

Anafilaxia tras realización de pruebas cutáneas en prick / Anaphylaxis after carrying out prick tests

Las pruebas cutáneas en prick (SPT) son un método sencillo y muy útil en la práctica alergológica diaria. Se han descrito reacciones sistémicas con este método diagnóstico en contadas ocasiones. Presentamos un caso de anafilaxia tras la realización de SPT con epitelio de gato. Se trataba de una mujer de 23 años que presentaba rinoconjuntivitis y asma bronquial al contacto con gato. Realizamos SPT con bateria de aeroalérgenos habituales, presentando cuadro de irritación ocular, disfonía y sensación de ocupación faríngea a los 20 minutos. Aunque el riesgo de reacción sistémica tras SPT es escaso, recomendamos la realización de esta prueba diagnóstica en lugares preparados para tratar reacciones anafilácticas y por personal experto

The skin prick test (SPT) is a simple and fast method used routinely in allergology practice. Systemic reactions have been described with this technique on few occasions. We are presenting a case of anaphylaxis with hemodynamic consequences after carrying out skin prick test with a cat dander extract. A 23 years old female who suffered rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma following contact with cats. We performed skin prick test with a battery of the usual inhalants. Twenty minutes after carrying out the prick test the patient showed intense ocular irritation and reddening followed by dysphonia and a feeling of pharyngeal occupation. Although skin prick test is a safe diagnostic approach, it should be performed only in places equipped to treat anaphylaxis and for trained specialists

Fixed exanthema from systemic tobramycin.

Eye drops contain several ophthalmic medications which can produce allergic reactions. We report the case of a patient with contact dermatitis from neomycin and a probable fixed exanthema after parenteral administration of tobramycin who tolerated topical tobramycin and other aminoglycosides.

Occupational asthma due to acrylates in a graphic arts worker.

BACKGROUND: Acrylates are used in a wide variety of products such as solvents, adhesives, paints, printing ink, soft contact lenses, porcelain nails, and methacrylates (used by dentists and orthopedists). Currently there are various types of acrylic compounds: acrylates, cyanoacrylates (such as tissue adhesives and home glues), and methacrylates (prostheses and dental and orthopedic fillings). The sensitization mechanism is unknown, but the allergy is believed to be due to a non-IgE mediated phenomenon, since a late asthmatic response occurs. Various cases of acrylate-induced asthma have been reported, especially in dentists and persons using glues or paints containing this substance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present the case of a 52-year-old man who had been working in graphic arts for the previous 7 years. For the previous 2 years he had experienced persistent cough with a sensation of drowning, dyspnea that increased with moderate exertion, and nasal obstruction despite continuous treatment. The symptoms first appeared after an episode of acute respiratory difficulty associated with weight loss, pulmonary infiltrates, and eosinophilia. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured during work and sick leave, and specific bronchial challenge with acrylates was performed in a bronchial chamber. RESULTS: The PEF improved on weekends and sick leave. The challenge test provoked a late asthmatic response and the non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity increased after the test. As well in the sputum samples there was a increase of eosinophil amount.

Occupational asthma due to acrylates in a graphic arts worker / Asma ocupacional por acrilatos en un trabajador de artes gráficas

Background: Acrylates are used in a wide variety of products such as solvents, adhesives, paints, printing ink, soft contact lenses, porcelain nails, and methacrylates (used by dentists and orthopedists). Currently there are various types of acrylic compounds: acrylates, cyanoacrylates (such as tissue adhesives and home glues), and methacrylates (prostheses and dental and orthopedic fillings). The sensitization mechanism is unknown, but the allergy is believed to be due to a non-IgE mediated phenomenon, since a late asthmatic response occurs. Various cases of acrylate-induced asthma have been reported, especially in dentists and persons using glues or paints containing this substance. Material and methods: We present the case of a 52-year-old man who had been working in graphic arts for the previous 7 years. For the previous 2 years he had experienced persistent cough with a sensation of drowning, dyspnea that increased with moderate exertion, and nasal obstruction despite continuous treatment. The symptoms first appeared after an episode of acute respiratory difficulty associated with weight loss, pulmonary infiltrates, and eosinophilia. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured during work and sick leave, and specific bronchial challenge with acrylates was performed in a bronchial chamber. Results: The PEF improved on weekends and sick leave. The challenge test provoked a late astmatic response and the non-specifc bronchial hyperreactivity increased after the test. As well in the sputum samples there was a increase of eosinophil amount

Antecedentes: Los acrilatos se usan en una amplia variedad de productos, como solventes, adhesivos, pinturas, tinta de imprenta, lentes de contacto blandas y uñas de porcelana, mientras que los metacrilatos los usan dentistas y ortopedas. Hay varios tipos de compuestos acrílicos: acrilatos, cianoacrilatos (como adhesivos de tejidos y pegamentos de uso doméstico), así como de metacrilatos usados en prótesis dentales y rellenos ortopédicos. Los mecanismos de sensibilización se desconocen, pero se piensa que la reacción alérgica no está mediada por IgE, ya que la reacción asmática se produce tardíamente. Hay publicados varios casos de asma inducida por acrilato, especialmente en dentistas y personas que usan colas o pinturas que contienen esas sustancias. Material y métodos: Se presenta el caso de un varón de 52 años de edad que había trabajado en artes gráficas en los últimos 7 años. En los dos últimos años había presentado tos persistente con sensación de ahogo, disnea que aumentaba con el ejercicio moderado y obstrucción nasal, a pesar del tratamiento continuado. Los síntomas aparecieron primero tras un episodio agudo de dificultad respiratoria asociada con pérdida de peso, infiltrados pulmonares y eosinofilia. El flujo espiratorio punta (PEF) se midió durante el trabajo y los días de baja laboral. Se llevó a cabo prueba de provocación con acrilatos en cámara bronquial. Resultados: El PEF mejoró en los fines de semana y los días de baja laboral. El test de provocación dio lugar a una crisis de asma tardía. Después de la prueba, aumentó la hiperreactividad bronquial no específica. Al mismo tiempo, en las muestras de esputo se constató un aumento del contenido en eosinófilos

Inducción de tolerancia en la hipersensibilidad a mesalazina (5-ASA) / Inductionof tolerance in hypersensitivity to mesalazine (5-ASA)

La mesalazina es un derivado del ácido 5-aminosalicílico (5-ASA, el cual es útil en el tratamiento de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. La sulfasalazina está formada por dos partes, la sulfapiridina y el 5-ASA, siendo ésta última la parte activa de la molécula. Los nuevos preparados derivados del 5-ASA se desarrollaron tratando de evitar los efectos secundarios tradicionalmente asociados a la sulfapiridina, aunque se siguen observando y aparecen nuevos efectos. Presentamos dos casos, el primero es un varón diagnosticado de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, con antecedentes de dos reacciones previas de urticaria y angioedema tras ácido acetilsalicílico, que presenta urticaria tras la toma de mesalazina. El segundo presenta urticaria generalizada tras tres meses de iniciar tratamiento con mesalazina. Dada la necesidad de tratamiento en ambos casos, se realiza el protocolo de desensibilización a mesalazina desarrollado en 17 días en nuestro servicio, con el que se llega a la tolerancia de dicho fármaco hasta dosis terapéuticas. Ante pacientes con hipersensibilidad a distintos fármacos, que sean necesarios para el tratamiento de su patología, pueden realizarse pautas de “desensibilización”, que aseguren una buena tolerancia

Mesalazine is a derivative of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), which is useful in the treatment of intestinal inflammatory disease. Sulfasalazine is formed by two parts, sulfapyridine and 5-ASA, the latter being the active part of the molecule. The new preparatives derived from 5-ASA were developed in an attempt to avoid the traditionally associated side effects to sulfapyridine, although they are still observed and new effects appear. We present two cases. The first is a man diagnosed of inflammatory intestinal disease, with background of two previous reactions of urticaria and angioedema after acetyl salicylic acid, who presented urticaria after taking mesalazine. The second one had generalized urticaria after three months of initiating treatment with mesalazine. Given the need for treatment in both cases, a desensitization protocol to mesalazine was made. It was developed in 17 days in our service. Tolerance to that drug to therapeutic doses is reached. When faced with patients with hypersensitivity to different drugs, that are necessary to treat their disease, “desensitization” regimes, that assure good tolerance, can be made

Flare up to betalactams.

BACKGROUND: The flare up phenomenon has most frequently been described with nickel. Not many cases of flare up to drugs have reported in the literature, however we have reported it with different medications. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 31-year-old woman developed an adverse reaction with an antibiotic during her childhood. Prick test with penicillin (100,000 IU/ml), penicilloyl polylysine (PPL), minor determinant mixture (MDM), amoxicillin (200 mg/ml), ampicillin (200 mg/ml) and cephalotin (200 mg/ml), and intradermal test to the same substances diluted in saline were all negative immediately. We performed an oral challenge test with 500 mg of amoxicillin. Twelve hours later, the intradermal test to PPL and MDM became positive (PPL 10 x 10 mm, MDM 8 x 7 mm). All patch tests were positive after 72 hours with erythema, vesicles and infiltration and the patient also had exanthema with pruritus on her entire body. CONCLUSIONS: We present one patient with delayed allergic reaction caused by amoxicillin and penicillin, that we all know as Flare up. We suggest that this phenomenon of Flare up occurs by a Type IV mechanism mediated by T-cells without participation of IgE antibodies. The betalactam hypersensitivity mechanism which has usually been described is an IgE mediated reaction, but there are other not very well known mechanisms that are responsible for the delayed reactions.

Flare up to betalactams

Background: The flare up phenomenon has most frequently been described with nickel. Not many cases of flare up to drugs have reported in the literature, however we have reported it with different medications. Methods and results: A 31-year-old woman developed an adverse reaction with an antibiotic during her childhood. Prick test with penicillin (100,000 IU/ml), penicilloyl polylysine (PPL), minor determinant mixture (MDM), amoxicillin (200 mg/ml), ampicillin (200 mg/ml) and cephalotin (200 mg/ml), and intradermal test to the same substances diluted in saline were all negative immediately. We performed an oral challenge test with 500 mg of amoxicillin. Twelve hours later, the intradermal test to PPL and MDM became positive (PPL 10 x 10 mm, MDM 8 x 7 mm). All patch tests were positive after 72 hours with erythema, vesicles and infiltration and the patient also had exanthema with pruritus on her entire body. Conclusions: We present one patient with delayed allergic reaction caused by amoxicillin and penicillin, that we all know as Flare up. We suggest that this phenomenon of Flare up occurs by a Type IV mechanism mediated by T-cells without participation of IgE antibodies. The betalactam hypersensitivity mechanism which has usually been described is an IgE mediated reaction, but there are other not very well known mechanisms that are responsible for the delayed reactions

No disponible

[Induction of tolerance in hypersensitivity to mesalazine (5-ASA)]. / Inducción de tolerancia en la hipersensibilidad a mesalazina (5-ASA).

Mesalazine is a derivative of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), which is useful in the treatment of intestinal inflammatory disease. Sulfasalazine is formed by two parts, sulfapyridine and 5-ASA, the latter being the active part of the molecule. The new preparatives derived from 5-ASA were developed in an attempt to avoid the traditionally associated side effects to sulfapyridine, although they are still observed and new effects appear. We present two cases. The first is a man diagnosed of inflammatory intestinal disease, with background of two previous reactions of urticaria and angioedema after acetyl salicylic acid, who presented urticaria after taking mesalazine. The second one had generalized urticaria after three months of initiating treatment with mesalazine. Given the need for treatment in both cases, a desensitization protocol to mesalazine was made. It was developed in 17 days in our service. Tolerance to that drug to therapeutic doses is reached. When faced with patients with hypersensitivity to different drugs, that are necessary to treat their disease, "desensitization" regimes, that assure good tolerance, can be made.

Nasal provocation test (NPT) with aspirin: a sensitive and safe method to diagnose aspirin-induced asthma (AIA).

BACKGROUND: We have aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a simpler technique with less risk than oral provocation to diagnose aspirin-induced asthma (AIA). METHODS: We studied a group of 20 AIA patients compared to a control group with 40 aspirin-tolerant patients (confirmed by oral provocation test): 10 asthmatic patients and 30 healthy subjects. A nasal provocation test (NPT) with lysine acetylsalicylic acid (L-ASA) was carried out. Nasal and pulmonary functions were monitored with anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) and spirometry. An L-ASA solution (900 mg/ml L-ASA, equivalent to 500 mg/ml acetylsalicylic acid) was diluted with saline solution. We administered four increasing doses: 5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) with saline solution control. Nasal and pulmonary functions were monitored with rhinomanometry and spirometry. The patients were controlled for nasal inspiratory peak flow and expiratory peak flow. RESULTS: The results showed high sensitivity and specificity: 80% and 92.5%, respectively, with an 84.2% positive predictive value and an 89.2% negative predictive value. The patients had no bronchial or systemic symptoms, and no decreases over 20% were recorded in the FEV1. CONCLUSION: NPT has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of AIA. An oral provocation should be performed to confirm the result whenever the clinical situation of the patient permits it.

Anisakis simplex: a cause of intestinal pseudo-obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: the ingestion of Anisakis simplex larvae may lead to the appearance of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the number of reported cases of parasitization by Anisakis in Spain is lower than would be expected in a country with the second-highest fish consumption per inhabitant in the world, particularly since fish is often eaten raw or only slightly cooked. We suggest that the incidence of anisakiasis in Spain would be higher if complementary studies were used in all patients suspected of having anisakiasis. METHODS: we studied 6 patients with a diagnosis of intestinal obstruction who frequently ate fish. Skin prick tests with seafood, inhalant allergen and Anisakis extracts were done. Total and specific IgE against Anisakis larvae were tested with a CAP system radioimmunoassay and immunoblot assays. Oral challenge tests with frozen larvae were also used. RESULTS: a positive skin prick result and high levels of total and specific IgE were found in all patients. The results of immunoblot assays for IgE did not show a consistent pattern, but a group of several low (14-18 kDa) and intermediate molecular weight antigens (30-50 kDa) were found in all patients. All patients tolerated the oral challenge test well. CONCLUSIONS: in our patients with intestinal pseudo-obstruction and a history of frequent fish eating, the clinical and laboratory findings were suggestive of parasitization by Anisakis simplex larvae as the cause of the obstruction. Such complementary studies should be used whenever there is a suspicion of anisakiasis. The results of the oral provocation test show that the intake of dead larvae does not induce clinical parasitization.

Anisakis simplex: una causa de pseudobstrucción intestinal / Anisakis simplex: a cause of intestinal pseudo-obstruction

OBJETIVOS: la ingesta de la larva viva del parásito Anisakis simplex puede provocar la aparición de síntomas gastrointestinales. Siendo España el segundo país consumidor de pescado por habitante, es destacable el bajo número de casos de Anisakiasis gastrointestinal recogidos en la bibliografía, más aún cuando se consume frecuentemente crudo o poco cocinado, criterios que posibilitan dicha parasitación. Pretendemos demostrar que se observarían una mayor incidencia de casos si se realizasen técnicas complementarias cuando exista sospecha clínica. DISEÑO EXPERIMENTAL: se han estudiado seis pacientes diagnosticados de pseudobstrucción intestinal e ingesta de pescado previamente. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas en prick con extractos de inhalantes, pescados y Anisakis simplex, determinación de IgE total, IgE específica frente a Anisakis mediante CAP radioinmunoensayo e inmunoblot y provocación oral controlada con larva de Anisakis previamente congelada. RESULTADOS: presentaron cifras elevadas de IgE total e IgE específica frente a Anísakís y Prick-test positivo con extracto del parásito. No se objetivó un patrón homogéneo en el inmunoblotting, pero todos reconocían antígenos de bajo peso molecular (14-18 Kd) y de mediano peso molecular (30-50). Los pacientes, sometidos a provocación, no refirieron sintomatología gastrointestinal o sistémica. CONCLUSIONES: presentamos seis pacientes en los que los hallazgos clínicos y de laboratorio orientan a considerar la parasitación por la larva de Anisakis simplex como factor etiológico del cuadro abdominal. Sería conveniente protocolizar el estudio complementario cuando exista sospecha clínica de anisakiasis. La ingesta de larva muerta no produce afectación clínica como así lo manifiesta la tolerancia al test de provocación (AU)