Motor and sensory responses after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in multiple sclerosis patients with lower urinary tract symptoms treated in daily practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an effective treatment option for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: Patients with MS and LUTS unresponsive to medical treatment received PTNS for 12 weeks after saline urodynamics to evaluate the prevalence of motor, sensory and combined responses during PTNS and to determine whether the type of response can predict treatment outcome. LUTS were also assessed using a 3-day bladder diary, patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) questionnaire, patient perception of intensity of urgency scale (PPIUS), Kings Health QOL questionnaire (KHQ) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) before and after treatment. Patients were considered as "responders" if they reported an improvement >50% in their LUTS according to the PPBC. Sensory, motor and combined sensory/motor responses were compared between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included. 61% (51/83) of patients were responders. Sensory, motor and combined sensory/motor responses were found in 64% (53/83), 6% (5/83) and 30% (25/83) of patients respectively. A sensory response alone, or in combination with a motor response, was better associated with a successful outcome than the presence of a motor response alone (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A sensory response, either alone or in combination with a motor response, is more frequent and seems to be better associated with a successful outcome of PTNS than motor response alone.

Maintenance percutaneous posterior nerve stimulation for refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: an open label, multicenter, prospective study.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is an effective second line therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms. Data on percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation maintenance treatment are scarce. In this study we evaluate its effectiveness and propose an algorithm of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation maintenance treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, open label trial consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis and lower urinary tract symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy were treated with 12 weekly sessions of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Responder patients (50% or greater improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms as measured by the patient perception of bladder condition questionnaire) entered a maintenance phase with individualized treatment frequency based on patient response. Lower urinary tract symptoms were assessed using a 3-day frequency volume chart, urodynamics and patient perception of bladder condition questionnaire. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a global response assessment scale and a treatment satisfaction visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were included in the study and 74 (89%) responded to initial treatment. Persistent efficacy occurred in all initial responders after a mean treatment of 24 months. The greatest frequency of maintenance percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation was every 2 weeks. Lower urinary tract symptoms and patient treatment satisfaction improved with time compared to initial treatment (p <0.05). Bladder diary parameters and voiding parameters improved compared to baseline (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatment leads to a persistent improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Tuberculosis of the pancreas diagnosed with needle aspiration.

Tuberculosis of the pancreas is very rare and can present with many signs and symptoms, including obstructive jaundice, weight loss and a mass in the head of the pancreas. Hence the diagnosis of pancreatic tuberculosis remains a challenge and a high index of suspicion is required. If a tumour is suspected then an ultrasound- or CT-guided fine needle aspiration should be performed. Even if the initial microbiological results are negative, using conventional techniques, PCR can yield more rapid results and avoid an unnecessary laparotomy.