Lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a metaanalysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 lowrisk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup metaanalyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05). Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.

Experimentally validated structural finite element method analysis of a tibial intramedullary nail: Optimal choice of the contact settings.

This article focuses on the static structural analysis of a tibial intramedullary nail, carried out by the finite element method. The investigated subject is concerned with the issue of frictional contacts that, generating a non-linear problem, play an important role in numerical analyses. Experimental tests were also developed on tibial intramedullary nail specimens. The experimental results, in terms of force-displacement, were used to calibrate and validate the finite element analysis, by tuning the contact parameters available in the software.

OPTIMIZING THE STAGING OF MELANOMA PATIENTS FOR THEIR BEST SURGICAL MANAGEMENT.

Interval nodes (IN) are defined as lymph nodes that lie along the course of lymphatic collecting vessels between a primary tumor site and a draining node field. Sometimes INs contain metastases and a consensus on their surgical management is needed. Therefore, to optimize the surgical management of melanoma patients with metastatic lymphatic involvement, especially when the sentinel lymph node biopsy identifies an unusual drainage field, we identified patients treated at the Department of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery of Bari between July 1994 and December 2012 identified with a primary-cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and subsequent positive-IN the lymphadenectomy to evaluate the impact of this procedure on overall survival and disease-free-period. 51 patients presented INs, and lymphadenectomy (LA) of the subsequent lymphatic field was performed in 13 subjects with positive-IN. In 4 cases additional lymphatic metastases were detected in the usual basin beyond the IN+. Recurrence-free period and survival rate at 5 years were higher in patients with positive-IN who underwent LA than in subjects who underwent LA due to positive lymph nodes in the usual field. Immediate lymphadenectomy of the subsequent lymphatic field in patients with positive-INs may afford patients earlier stage treatment of their disease and improved prognosis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma*.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to evaluate prognosis and surgical management of head and neck melanoma (HNM) and the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with a primary cutaneous melanoma treated starting from 01/07/1994 to 31/12/2012 in the department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Bari are included in a electronic clinical medical registry. Within the 90th day from excision of the primary lesion all patients with adverse prognostic features underwent SLNB. All patients with positive findings underwent lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: out of 680 patients affected by melanoma, 84 (12.35%) had HNM. In the HNM cohort lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 57 patients, 15 of which (26.3%) were positive. The percentage of unfound sentinel lymph node was similar both to the HNM group (5,26%) and to patients with melanoma of different sites (OMS 4,92%). There was a recurrence of disease after negative SLNB (false negatives) only in 4 cases. Recurrence-free period and survival rate at 5 years were worse in HNM cohort. CONCLUSION: SLNB of HNM has been for a long time contested due to its complex lymphatic anatomy, but recent studies agreed with this technique. Our experience showed that identification of sentinel lymph node in HNM cohort was possible in 98.25% of cases. Frequency of interval nodes is significantly higher in HNM group. The prognosis of HNM cohort is significantly shorter than OMS one. Finally, this procedure requires a multidisciplinary team in referral centers.