Prognostic implications of fibrosis in low risk aortic stenosis patients.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among patients with aortic stenosis (AS), interstitial fibrosis has been associated with progression to heart failure and is a marker of poorer prognosis. We aimed to assess the impact of myocardial fibrosis on clinical events after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in low risk, severe AS. METHODS: We prospectively followed 56 severe AS patients with ejection fraction >40%, who underwent AVR with simultaneous myocardial biopsies and collagen volume fraction (CVF) determination. Baseline and follow-up echocardiographic parameters were assessed. Outcomes were all-cause death and the combined endpoint of all-cause death or non-fatal cardiovascular hospitalization. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly women (67.9%) and mean age was 66±12 years. At follow-up, there was a significant decrease in transaortic gradients and wall stress, as well as regression in indexed LV mass. Patients who suffered a fatal event or the combined endpoint had a higher degree of fibrosis (27.1±20.7% vs. 15.4±11.8%, p=0.035; 24.0±18.2% vs. 15.3±12.0%, p=0.038, respectively). Patients with CVF≥15.4% had higher rates of all-cause death (37.5% vs. 97.0%, p=0.001) and lower survival free of the combined endpoint of all-cause death or non-fatal cardiovascular hospitalization (0% vs. 91.2%, p<0.001). CVF was the only independent predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio (HR) 1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.29 for each 10% increase; p=0.026) and all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.73; 95% CI: 1.03-2.911 for each 10% increase; p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In low risk AS patients, higher levels of fibrosis are independent predictors of all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death or non-fatal cardiovascular hospitalization. Further advances in anti-fibrotic therapies in AS are needed.

Long-term outcomes of primary cardiovascular prevention: A retrospective study at a referral center in Portugal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lifestyle changes are frequently insufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with dyslipidemia. This study aims to characterize the long-term evolution of lipid profile and CV risk of patients under primary prevention. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of outpatients at a Portuguese cardiovascular risk clinic with ≥2 CV risk factors, followed for ≥2 years between 1995 and 2015. Statin therapy had been initiated early, in accordance with the clinic's practice. After written informed consent was obtained, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected from medical charts, at baseline and last visit. Changes in lipid profile and CV risk scores were estimated. Associations between HDL-C or LDL-C changes and gender, age, observation time and treatments were assessed through bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: Out of 516 participants with mean follow-up of 11.4±4.3 years, 56.6% were female and 91.5% received statins. Lipid profile showed statistically significant improvement, including median changes in LDL-C and HDL-C of -77.0 mg/dl and +19 mg/dl, respectively. CV risk also showed statistically significant improvements according to all scores. Statin therapy resulted in a mean HDL-C increase of 7.4 mg/dl (independently of gender and other treatments) and a mean LDL-C reduction of 51.8 mg/dl (irrespective of age and other treatments). CONCLUSION: Results from this long-term real-life study indicate that primary prevention, specifically early and continuous therapy with intermediate-intensity statins as an add-on to lifestyle interventions, was important in obtaining consistent and adequate metabolic correction in patients with additional risk factors.

Does the type of seizure influence heart rate variability changes?

OBJECTIVE: Heart rate variability (HRV), an index of the autonomic cardiac activity, is decreased in patients with epilepsy, and a low HRV is associated with a higher risk of sudden death. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures are one of the most consistent risk factors for SUDEP, but the influence (and relative risk) of each type of seizure on cardiac function is still unknown. Our objective was to assess the impact of the type of seizure (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure - FBTCS - versus non-FBTCS) on periictal HRV, in a group of patients with refractory epilepsy and both types of seizures. METHODS: We performed a 48-hour Holter recording on 121 patients consecutively admitted to our Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. We only included patients with both FBTCS and non-FBTCS on the Holter recording and selected the first seizure of each type to analyze. To evaluate HRV parameters (AVNN, SDNN, RMSSD, pNN20, LF, HF, and LF/HF), we chose 5-min epochs pre- and postictally. RESULTS: We included 14 patients, with a median age of 36 (min-max, 16-55) years and 64% were female. Thirty-six percent had cardiovascular risk factors, but no previously known cardiac disease. In the preictal period, there were no statistically significant differences in HRV parameters, between FBTCS and non-FBTCS. In the postictal period, AVNN, RMSSD, pNN20, LF, and HF were significantly lower, and LF/HF and HR were significantly higher in FBTCS. From preictal to postictal periods, FBTCS elicited a statistically significant rise in HR and LF/HF, and a statistically significant fall in AVNN, RMSSD, pNN20, and HF. Non-FBTCS only caused statistically significant changes in HR (decrease) and AVNN (increase). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSION: This work emphasizes the greater effect of FBTCS in autonomic cardiac function in patients with refractory epilepsy, compared to other types of seizures, with a significant reduction in vagal tonus, which may be associated with an increased risk of SUDEP.

Heart rate variability in patients with refractory epilepsy: The influence of generalized convulsive seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with epilepsy, mainly drug-resistant, have reduced heart rate variability (HRV), linked to an increased risk of sudden death in various other diseases. In this context, it could play a role in SUDEP. Generalized convulsive seizures (GCS) are one of the most consensual risk factors for SUDEP. Our objective was to assess the influence of GCS in HRV parameters in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 121 patients with refractory epilepsy admitted to our Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. All patients underwent a 48-hour Holter recording. Only patients with GCS were included (n = 23), and we selected the first as the index seizure. We evaluated HRV (AVNN, SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50, LF, HF, and LF/HF) in 5-min epochs (diurnal and nocturnal baselines; preictal - 5 min before the seizure; ictal; postictal - 5 min after the seizure; and late postictal - >5 h after the seizure). These data were also compared with normative values from a healthy population (controlling for age and gender). RESULTS: We included 23 patients, with a median age of 36 (min-max, 16-55) years and 65% were female. Thirty percent had cardiovascular risk factors, but no previously known cardiac disease. HRV parameters AVNN, RMSSD, pNN50, and HF were significantly lower in the diurnal than in the nocturnal baseline, whereas the opposite occurred with LF/HF and HR. Diurnal baseline parameters were inferior to the normative population values (which includes only diurnal values). We found significant differences in HRV parameters between the analyzed periods, especially during the postictal period. All parameters but LF/HF suffered a reduction in that period. LF/HF increased in that period but did not reach statistical significance. Visually, there was a tendency for a global reduction in our patients' HRV parameters, namely AVNN, RMSSD, and pNN50, in each period, comparing with those from a normative healthy population. No significant differences were found in HRV between diurnal and nocturnal seizures, between temporal lobe and extra-temporal-lobe seizures, between seizures with and without postictal generalized EEG suppression, or between seizures of patients with and without cardiovascular risk factors. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSION: Our work reinforces the evidence of autonomic cardiac dysfunction in patients with refractory epilepsy, at baseline and mainly in the postictal phase of a GCS. Those changes may have a role in some SUDEP cases. By identifying patients with worse autonomic cardiac function, HRV could fill the gap of a lacking SUDEP risk biomarker.

The addition of neoadjuvant pertuzumab for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer: a cost estimate with real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is largely prevalent worldwide. HER2-positive BC account for roughly 20-25% of all BC cases and has an overall survival lower than other BC. Innovation on BC therapeutics is a constant, but novel therapies have higher costs. Therefore, cost-effectiveness research is essential to provide healthcare decision-makers with solid foundations for a resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the average direct medical costs/patient and cost-effectiveness of adding pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment (NeoT) for HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Two retrospective real-world consecutive cohorts of ≥18yo female patients diagnosed with HER2-positive BC treated with NeoT at the Breast Clinic of IPO-Porto were studied. The AC-DH regimen (2012-2015) comprised 8 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (4 cycles of doxorubicin + cyclosphosphamide followed by 4 cycles ofdocetaxel + trastuzumab), while the AC-DHP regimen (2015-2017) included also pertuzumab as NeoT. NeoT was followed by surgery and adjuvant trastuzumab. Micro-costing technique and a bottom-up approach was used comprising all medical direct costs from the hospital perspective. Unit costs were obtained from government official prices or from IPO-Porto costing system. Costs were adjusted to 2017 and are expressed in euros. Multivariable logistic regression models were used for effectiveness assessment, while generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used for costs. ICER was calculated using the pathological complete response (pCR) as the preferential measure of effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. RESULTS: AC-DHP (n = 40) and AC-DH (n = 54) cohorts had heterogenous patient profiles (median age 43y/53y; 67.5%/59.3% positive HR; 60.0%/27.8% operable; 25.0%/24.1% inflammatory, respectively). The AC-DHP average total cost/patient was 56,375€, with pertuzumab accounting for 13,978€ (24.79%) and increasing in 15,982€ the average cost/patient (p < 0.001). Clinical staging and hormone receptors (HR) were significantly associated with pCR. ICER was 1.370€ per percentage point of pCR. CONCLUSIONS: ICER was more favourable in stage III HR negative BC patients compared to other patient profiles. Innovative treatments access is critical to deliver high-quality healthcare, but sustainability must be considered. These results suggest the importance of establishing a cost-effectiveness profile of Pertuzumab in NeoT for HER2-positive BC.

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era in Portugal: a retrospective analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative.

BACKGROUND: As part of the multinational I-O Optimise research initiative, this retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluated real-world treatment patterns and survival prior to immunotherapy reimbursement in Portugal. METHODS: This study utilized a database held by IPO-Porto, Portugal's largest oncology hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC from January 2012 to December 2016 at IPO-Porto, with follow-up to June 2017, were included. Treatment analyses were performed from 2015 onwards. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS and systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) treatment were assessed using multivariate statistical models. RESULTS: Of 1524 patients diagnosed with NSCLC at IPO-Porto, 1008 patients had advanced disease (stage IIIB: 10.1%, 154/1524, stage IV: 56.0%, 854/1524). For those with advanced disease, median age was 65 years (range: 21-92) and 75.6% (762/1008) were male. Median OS (interquartile range [IQR]) was 11.4 (5.2-26.9) months for stage IIIB and 6.3 (2.4-15.0) months for stage IV. Factors associated with decreased risk of death included female sex and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) mutations/rearrangements; factors associated with increased risk of death included older age and stage IV disease. Among patients diagnosed in 2015 or 2016, 75.8% (297/392) received ≥1 line of SACT. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line therapy (non-squamous cell carcinoma [NSQ]: 72.9%; squamous cell carcinoma [SQ] 87.3%, 55/63; patients with EGFR/ALK mutations/rearrangements primarily received tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The likelihood of receiving SACT was lower in older patients and those diagnosed with stage IV disease. Patients not receiving SACT had poor survival outcomes (median OS [IQR]: NSQ, 1.8 [1.1-3.1] months; SQ, 2.3 (1.3-3.4) months), while median OS (IQR) in SACT-treated patients was 12.6 (6.1-24.5) months for NSQ and 10.3 (5.7-15.9) months for SQ. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world data analysis from a large Portuguese oncology hospital demonstrates a high disease burden for advanced NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era, with nearly one-quarter of patients not receiving SACT. Even in patients receiving SACT, median survival was only about 1 year.

cTnI, BNP and CRP profiling after seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To profile serum levels of high sensitivity Troponin I (hs-cTnI), B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), and high sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hs-CRP), after epileptic seizures in patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy, relating the results to the revised SUDEP-7 inventory. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients admitted to our Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. hs-cTnI, BNP, and hs-CRP were measured at admission and after the first seizure. The revised SUDEP-7 Risk Inventory was calculated. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (53.4 % female). The index seizure was a focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (FBTCS) in 25.9 % of the patients, and 17.5 % had post-ictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES). After the seizure, 25.9 % had a significant (above 50 %) increase in hs-cTnI, 23.3 % in BNP, and 4.3 % in hs-CRP. About 40 % had cardiovascular risk factors (CRF), without known cardiac disease. The elevation of one biomarker did not compel the elevation of another. hs-cTnI increase was associated with FBTCS, PGES, longer seizures, maximal ictal heart rate, and HR change. Increases in BNP were associated with CRF. hs-CRP increase was associated with PGES. We found no significant association between SUDEP-7 and any biomarker increase. SIGNIFICANCE: Several patients had increases in biomarkers of myocardial necrosis/dysfunction after seizures, without significant association with the SUDEP-7 inventory. Different patterns of biomarkers' elevations point to multifactorial pathophysiologies hypothetically associated with incipient myocardial lesions. A larger cohort with follow-up data could help to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

Outcomes Management in a Real-World Evidence Context: The Case of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

At present, for patients with metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer, European Society for Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend enzalutamide (E) or abiraterone (A). There are still a few studies comparing both drugs in a real-world setting, thus, in this article, we discuss an outcomes management methodology, supporting the follow-up of patients. This involves measuring relevant baseline traits and outcomes, such as overall survival (OS), treatment duration, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. We include 38 men in the A group and 15 in the E group. When comparing the survival of both drugs, both present similar OS. Regarding the quality-of-life analysis (QoL) with EPIC26, reported Standard QoL score was 58.3% in our patients, which was in line with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer reference. As a result, by showing that we can capture the distinctive clinical benefits of A and E, and that patient-reported outcomes can be systematically collected for more than 2 years per living patient, we can now incorporate these findings in clinical discussions, risk-sharing agreements, or policy-level arguments.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Pharmacists: Does It Reduce Costs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has as its main objective to ensure that the plasma drug concentration remains within the appropriate range. Regarding the economic dimension of TDM, it is known that there are gains in health outcomes; however, there is still little evidence for the benefit of this procedure performed by pharmacists within the hospital context. With this project, we aimed to create a matrix of cost avoidance associated with TDM performed by pharmacists and to quantify the total avoided costs in 1 year, by implementing a TDM process in a tertiary hospital. For the studied period, we collected 362 pharmaceutical interventions related to TDM of antibiotics performed in adults. As a result, considering these data, the total cost avoidance in 1 year was 371,018 ($416,584.58) at one medical center. We conclude that TDM is highly cost-avoidant and that the implementation costs by pharmaceutical services is clearly lower than the benefit achieved.

Lipoprotein(a) as a key target in combined therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent cardiovascular risk factor but is closely associated with other similar risk factors that are manageable with appropriate treatment and guidance. We aimed to study the impact of using combined therapy for managing Lp(a) levels in patients at high cardiovascular risk but without major adverse cardiovascular events, in primary prevention. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in 516 patients randomly selected from a group of 1677 patients who attended cardiovascular risk and metabolism consultations between 1995 and 2015. The disorders observed and therapies used were classified into nosological and pharmacological groups, respectively. Cardiovascular risk was calculated based on the Framingham risk score, the European Society of Cardiology's SCORE and the American College of Cardiology's ASCVD Risk Estimator, and changes in patients' lifestyle were assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<0.001) were found in almost all metabolic variables, except fasting insulin and C-peptide. Lp(a) levels were also significantly reduced (p<0.001). Carotid intima-media thickness improved, decreasing from 2.90 mm to 1.40 mm; however, there was no reduction in the number of cases of vascular stenosis. Of patients with hepatic steatosis (85.5%), 40.7% presented hepatomegaly, but liver function was only altered in a few patients (14.5%). Lipid-lowering therapy, especially statins, significantly decreased Lp(a), benefiting from synergy with other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) is a key overall indicator of vascular risk and should be considered a therapeutic target. Besides a healthy lifestyle, primary prevention should include combined drug therapies to address all cardiovascular risk factors and to delay the atherosclerotic process.

Genetic Variants Are Not Rare in ICD Candidates with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Time for Next-Generation Sequencing?

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), even though SCD may occur with LVEF > 35%. Family history of unexplained SCD, especially in the young, raises concern about potential inheritable risk factors. It remains largely unknown how genetic tests can be integrated into clinical practice, particularly in the selection of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in DCM patients with a class I recommendation for ICD implantation, based on current guidelines. METHODS: We included ambulatory stable adult patients with idiopathic or familial DCM with previously implanted ICD. Molecular analysis included 15 genes (LMNA, MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNT2, ACTC1, TPM1, CSRP3, TCAP, SGCD, PLN, MYL2, MYL3, TNNI3, TAZ, and LDB3) using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: We evaluated 21 patients, 12 (57%) males and 9 (43%) with familial DCM, including 3 (14%) with a family history of premature unexplained SCD. Mean age at DCM diagnosis was 40 ± 2 years, and mean age at ICD implantation was 50 ± 12 years. LVEF was 27 ± 9%, and LV end-diastolic diameter was 65 ± 7 mm. Genetic variants were found in six (29%) patients, occurring in 5 genes: TPM1, TNNT2, MYH7, PLN, and MYBPC3. The majority were classified as variants of uncertain significance. Family history of SCD was present in both patients with PLN variants. CONCLUSION: In patients with DCM and ICD, genetic variants could be identified in a significant proportion of patients in several genes, highlighting the potential role of genetics in DCM SCD risk stratification.

Lipoprotein(a) in the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk in the Portuguese Population.

INTRODUCTION: High values of lipoprotein(a), related to atherosclerosis progression, are often considered a marker of thrombosis. We assessed the lipoprotein(a) profile in a group of patients with high vascular risk and no cardiovascular events, established its correlation with other cardiovascular risk factors and inferred the results for patients with metabolic disorders and, at least, two risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This longitudinal observational study included 516 patients, who had at least two cardiovascular risk factors and regularly attended, for at least two years, the outpatient consultations at a clinic of metabolism and vascular risk for primary prevention. Sociodemographic, clinical and anthropometric parameters were obtained at the baseline visit. Hepatic morphology was assessed in 509 patients (98.6%) by ultrasonography. The 10-year vascular risk was estimated using Framingham risk score, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and systematic coronary risk evaluation tables. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between lipoprotein(a) levels and the addressed vascular risk factors, as well as between lipoprotein(a), and Framingham risk score, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and systematic coronary risk evaluation charts. Lipoprotein(a) values were also considerably higher in patients with steatosis. DISCUSSION: Increased lipoprotein(a) values were directly associated with all markers of cardiovascular risk and with non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis. CONCLUSION: Due to its high availability and low cost, lipoprotein(a) should become part of the routine evaluation of patients at vascular risk.

Introdução: Valores elevados de lipoproteína(a), relacionados com a progressão da aterosclerose, são frequentemente considerados marcadores de trombose. O perfil de lipoproteína(a) foi avaliado num grupo de doentes sem eventos cardiovasculares mas com elevado risco vascular, estabelecendo-se a correlação com outros fatores de risco cardiovascular e inferindo-se os resultados para doentes com alterações metabólicas e, pelo menos, dois fatores de risco vascular. Material e Métodos: Este estudo observacional longitudinal incluiu 516 doentes com, pelo menos, dois fatores de risco cardiovascular e que frequentavam, regularmente e há pelo menos dois anos, a consulta ambulatória de metabolismo e risco vascular para prevenção primária. Os parâmetros sociodemográficos, clínicos e antropométricos foram recolhidos na primeira visita. A morfologia hepática foi avaliada por ultrassonografia em 509 doentes (98,6%). O risco vascular a 10 anos foi estimado através de tabelas de cálculo de risco de Framingham, doença cardiovascular e risco coronário sistemático. Resultados: Foram encontradas correlações significativas entre os níveis de lipoproteína(a) e os fatores de risco vasculares analisados, assim como entre lipoproteína(a) e as escalas de risco de Framingham, doença cardiovascular e risco coronário sistemático. Os valores de lipoproteína(a) apresentaram-se mais elevados em doentes com esteatose. Discussão: Os valores elevados de lipoproteína(a) estão diretamente associados com todos os marcadores de risco cardiovascular e com esteatose hepática não alcoólica. Conclusão: Como tal, considerando a sua elevada acessibilidade e custo reduzido, o marcador lipoproteína(a) deverá ser integrado na avaliação de rotina de doentes com risco vascular.

Molecular characterization of Portuguese patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a disease of the heart muscle characterized by ventricular dilatation and impaired systolic function. Familial forms account for 30-50% of cases. Autosomal dominant inheritance is the predominant pattern of transmission. Causal genetic variants have been identified in several genes and molecular diagnosis has implications for genetic counseling and risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the frequency of genetic variants and the molecular basis of DCM in Portugal. METHODS: We performed a multicenter study of unrelated patients, recruited between 2013 and 2014. Variants in 15 genes were screened using PCR with direct sequencing (next-generation sequencing with at least 30-fold coverage combined with Sanger sequencing). RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included, 64 (60%) men, mean age at diagnosis 38±13 years, with 48 (45%) familial cases. In total, 31 rare variants in eight genes (mainly in MYBPC3, TNNT2 and LMNA) were identified, in 28 patients (26%). Only four variants had been previously described in association with DCM, 11 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and nine variants were novel. Four variants were likely pathogenic and the remainder were of uncertain significance. We found no major differences in the main clinical and imaging characteristics between patients with or without rare variants and patients with likely pathogenic variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reflect the complexity and diversity of DCM genetics. For better interpretation of the pathogenicity of the variants found and their causative roles in DCM, molecular cascade screening of families is imperative. Further insight into genotype-phenotype correlations and risk stratification is desirable.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal.

OBJECTIVE: We provide a real-world overview of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment patterns, outcomes and healthcare resource use (HRU) in Portugal. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from consecutive patients diagnosed/treated at the Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto) between 2012 and 2015. Primary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with treatment patterns and HRU secondary. Analysis was by line of therapy (LOT), and post hoc by age (<65/≥65 years). RESULTS: 165, 73 and 32 patients received first, second and third LOTs respectively (N = 187). OS probabilities were 91.5%, 83.2% (<65 years) and 86.6%, 65.3% (≥65 years) at 12, 24 months respectively. PFS decreased from the start of each LOT for both age groups and was less for patients ≥65 years. Younger patients received more combination treatment (immunomodulatory drugs + proteasome inhibitors) and stem cell transplants, and had higher mean costs than older patients (€81,213 vs. €36,864 where three LOTs were received). Cost drivers were medications, transplantations and hospitalisations. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest divergence between younger and older MM patients. Older patients had lower OS and PFS probabilities, HRU costs and fewer stem cell transplantations. The treatment patterns in each LOT may differ from other countries' findings, suggesting treatment heterogeneity.

Moving the needle towards the democratization of echocardiography: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography has been traditionally performed in echo labs and the potential benefits of its use by primary care physicians (PCPs) are still unexplored. We present a case where POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) was used as a complement of physical examination by a family doctor, allowing a prompt clinical decision in a heart failure (HF) patient. CASE SUMMARY: An 85-year-old woman, living independently, asks her family doctor for a home consultation due to increasing dyspnoea. On examination, severe dyspnoea and bilateral ankle oedema was noted and a point-of-care echocardiogram was performed by the primary care physician, who observed: severely compromised left ventricular systolic function, moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and severe dilation of the inferior vena cava. As a result, the diagnosis of HF with decreased ejection fraction was formed supporting the therapeutic decision. DISCUSSION: This case represents an elderly patient with dyspnoea, without previous HF diagnosis. The primary care physician, used portable ultrasound as a complement of physical examination, which confirmed a HF diagnosis, allowing a prompt decision-making on therapy. POCUS, can be a powerful tool to expedite treatment in different settings, including the home consultations by PCPs.

Development of a benchmark tool for cancer centers; results from a pilot exercise.

BACKGROUND: Differences in cancer survival exist between countries in Europe. Benchmarking of good practices can assist cancer centers to improve their services aiming for reduced inequalities. The aim of the BENCH-CAN project was to develop a cancer care benchmark tool, identify performance differences and yield good practice examples, contributing to improving the quality of interdisciplinary care. This paper describes the development of this benchmark tool and its validation in cancer centers throughout Europe. METHODS: A benchmark tool was developed and executed according to a 13 step benchmarking process. Indicator selection was based on literature, existing accreditation systems, and expert opinions. A final format was tested in eight cancer centers. Center visits by a team of minimally 3 persons, including a patient representative, were performed to verify information, grasp context and check on additional questions (through semi-structured interviews). Based on the visits, the benchmark methodology identified opportunities for improvement. RESULTS: The final tool existed of 61 qualitative and 141 quantitative indicators, which were structured in an evaluative framework. Data from all eight participating centers showed inter-organization variability on many indicators, such as bed utilization and provision of survivorship care. Subsequently, improvement suggestions for centers were made; 85% of which were agreed upon. CONCLUSION: A benchmarking tool for cancer centers was successfully developed and tested and is available in an open format. The tool allows comparison of inter-organizational performance. Improvement opportunities were successfully identified for every center involved and the tool was positively evaluated.