Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 53(5): 639-645, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management regarding metastatic colorectal cancer throughout Europe is not well known. AIMS: To draw a European comparison of the management and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancers. METHODS: Factors associated with chemotherapy administration were identified through logistic regressions. Net survival was estimated and crude probabilities of death related to cancer and other causes using a flexible cumulative hazard model. RESULTS: Among the 13 227 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 in cancer registries from 10 European countries, 3140 were metastatic. 62% of metastatic patients received chemotherapy. Compared to Spain, the related adjusted odds ratios ranged from 0.7 to 4.0 (P<0.001) according to country. The 3-year net survival by country ranged between 16% and 37%. The survival gap between countries diminished from 21% to 10% when adjusting for chemotherapy, age and sex. Geographical differences in the crude probability of death related to cancer were large for patients <70 or ≥80 years at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in the application of European guidelines partly explain these differences. General health between populations, accessibility to a reference centre, or provision of health care could also be involved. Further population-based studies are warranted to disentangle between these possible explanations.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnosis , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Registries , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(1): 191-202, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556466

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To validate tools to identify patients at risk for perioperative complications to implement prehabilitation programmes in head and neck surgery (H&N). METHODS: Retrospective cohort including 128 patients submitted to H&N, with postoperative Intermediate Care Unit admittance. The accuracy of the risk calculators ASA, P-POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP and ARISCAT to predict postoperative complications and mortality was assessed. A multivariable analysis was subsequently performed to create a new risk prediction model for serious postoperative complications in our institution. RESULTS: Our 30-day morbidity and mortality were 45.3% and 0.8%, respectively. The ACS-NSQIP failed to predict complications and had an acceptable discrimination ability for predicting death. The discrimination ability of ARISCAT for predicting respiratory complications was acceptable. ASA and P-POSSUM were poor predictors for mortality and morbidity. Our new prediction model included ACS-NSQIP and ARISCAT (area under the curve 0.750, 95% confidence intervals: 0.63-0.87). CONCLUSION: Despite the insufficient value of these risk calculators when analysed individually, we designed a risk tool combining them which better predicts the risk of serious complications.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Cohort Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...