Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) causes multi-lineage myelosuppression. Trilaciclib is an intravenous CDK4/6 inhibitor in development to proactively preserve HSPC and immune system function during chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Preclinically, trilaciclib transiently maintains HSPC in G1 arrest and protects them from chemotherapy damage, leading to faster hematopoietic recovery and enhanced antitumor immunity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase Ib (open-label, dose-finding) and phase II (randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled) study of the safety, efficacy and PK of trilaciclib in combination with etoposide/carboplatin (E/P) therapy for treatment-naive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients. Patients received trilaciclib or placebo before E/P on days 1-3 of each cycle. Select end points were prespecified to assess the effect of trilaciclib on myelosuppression and antitumor efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were enrolled, with 19 patients in part 1 and 75 patients in part 2 receiving study drug. Improvements were seen with trilaciclib in neutrophil, RBC (red blood cell) and lymphocyte measures. Safety on trilaciclib+E/P was improved with fewer ≥G3 adverse events (AEs) in trilaciclib (50%) versus placebo (83.8%), primarily due to less hematological toxicity. No trilaciclib-related ≥G3 AEs occurred. Antitumor efficacy assessment for trilaciclib versus placebo, respectively, showed: ORR (66.7% versus 56.8%, P = 0.3831); median PFS [6.2 versus 5.0 m; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; P = 0.1695]; and OS (10.9 versus 10.6 m; HR 0.87; P = 0.6107). CONCLUSION: Trilaciclib demonstrated an improvement in the patient's tolerability of chemotherapy as shown by myelopreservation across multiple hematopoietic lineages resulting in fewer supportive care interventions and dose reductions, improved safety profile, and no detriment to antitumor efficacy. These data demonstrate strong proof-of-concept for trilaciclib's myelopreservation benefits. CLINICAL TRAIL NUMBER: NCT02499770.

Global, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 in patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated AGS-1C4D4, a fully human monoclonal antibody to prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), with gemcitabine in a randomized, phase II study of metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0/1 and previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 1:2 to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) weekly seven times, 1 week rest, weekly three times q4weeks) or gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 (48 mg/kg loading dose, then 24 mg/kg q3weeks IV). The primary end point was 6-month survival rate (SR). Archived tumor samples were collected for pre-planned analyses by PSCA expression. RESULTS: Between April 2009 and May 2010, 196 patients were randomly assigned to gemcitabine (n = 63) or gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 (n = 133). The 6-month SR was 44.4% (95% CI, 31.9-57.5) in the gemcitabine arm and 60.9% (95% CI, 52.1-69.2) in the gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 arm (P = 0.03), while the median survival was 5.5 versus 7.6 months and the response rate was 13.1% versus 21.6% in the two arms, respectively. The 6-month SR was 57.1% in the gemcitabine arm versus 79.5% in the gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 arm among the PSCA-positive subgroup and 31.6% versus 46.2% among the PSCA-negative subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, phase II study achieved its primary end point, demonstrating an improved 6-month SR with addition of AGS-1C4D4 to gemcitabine among patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00902291.

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab (AMG 479) or conatumumab (AMG 655) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ganitumab (a mAb antagonist of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) or conatumumab (a mAb agonist of human death receptor 5) combined with gemcitabine in a randomized phase 2 trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to i.v. gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) combined with open-label ganitumab (12 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2W]), double-blind conatumumab (10 mg/kg Q2W), or double-blind placebo Q2W. The primary end point was 6-month survival rate. Results In total, 125 patients were randomized. The 6-month survival rates were 57% (95% CI 41-70) in the ganitumab arm, 59% (42-73) in the conatumumab arm, and 50% (33-64) in the placebo arm. The grade ≥3 adverse events in the ganitumab, conatumumab, and placebo arms, respectively, included neutropenia (18/22/13%), thrombocytopenia (15/17/8%), fatigue (13/12/5%), alanine aminotransferase increase (15/5/8%), and hyperglycemia (18/2/3%). CONCLUSIONS: Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had tolerable toxicity and showed trends toward an improved 6-month survival rate and overall survival. Additional investigation into this combination is warranted. Conatumumab combined with gemcitabine showed some evidence of activity as assessed by the 6-month survival rate.

Phase I dose-escalation study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of brivanib alaninate in combination with full-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies who have failed prior therapy.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics and efficacy of brivanib combined with full-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies who had failed prior therapies received brivanib (320, 600 or 800 mg daily) plus cetuximab (400 mg m(-2) loading dose then 250 mg m(-2) weekly). Assessments included adverse events, PK, tumour response, 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emitting tomography and K-Ras mutation analyses. RESULTS: Toxicities observed were manageable; the most common treatment-related toxicities (>10% of patients) were fatigue, diarrhoea, anorexia, increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, acneiform dermatitis, headache, mucosal inflammation, nausea, dry skin, vomiting, hypertension, pruritus, proteinuria and weight loss. Of 62 patients, 6 (9.7%) had objective radiographic partial responses, with an overall response rate of 10%. Median duration of response was 9.2 months; median progression-free survival was 3.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptable toxicity profile and efficacy of brivanib observed in this study were promising. These findings are being further evaluated in a phase III study of brivanib plus cetuximab vs cetuximab alone in patients previously treated with combination chemotherapy for K-Ras wild-type advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

A phase II trial of perifosine in locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Perifosine, a heterocyclic alkylphosphocholine signal transduction inhibitor, has activity against multiple cell types in vitro. This is a phase II study to determine activity and toxicity of perifosine in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1, were enrolled. An oral loading dose of 900 mg was followed by 100 mg per day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) methodology and a 2-stage design were used. Suspension could occur for inadequate response in the first cohort or for more than 25% grade 3 or greater toxicity. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Six received 1 month and 4 received 2 months of treatment. Four discontinued therapy as a result of progression and 2 because of clinical deterioration. Three died during treatment. One patient had stable disease but discontinued therapy as a result of unacceptable adverse events (95% confidence interval: 0.3-45%). There were no objective responses and all patients died of progressive disease. Median overall and progression-free survival was 1.85 months (95% confidence interval: 0.9-2.7) and 1.5 months (95% confidence interval: 0.9-1.9) respectively. CONCLUSION: The study was suspended and subsequently terminated as a result of unacceptable adverse events during the first stage. Perifosine does not appear to be worthy of further study in this group of patients.

Phase II trial of irinotecan/gemcitabine as second-line therapy for relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 39902.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the irinotecan/gemcitabine combination in patients with relapsed/refractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable tumor who had received one previous chemotherapy or chemotherapy/radiation regimen were eligible. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered i.v. over 30 min followed immediately by irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) i.v. over 90 min, both on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Patients were stratified based on response to initial treatment [i.e. primary sensitive disease with progression >or=3 months (group A), or refractory disease (group B)]. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled but one never received treatment and one ineligible patient did not have SCLC. Median patient ages of the remaining patients were 61 and 63 years in groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 36), respectively, with performance status of 0 or 1 in 85% of 71 patients. Primary grade 3/4 toxic effects in groups A versus B were neutropenia (36% versus 43%), thrombocytopenia (36% versus 26%), nausea (12% versus 11%), vomiting (0 versus 11%), diarrhea (12% versus 9%), and pulmonary (12% versus 12%). Two patients had fatal events including pneumonitis (n = 1) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 1). Responses occurred in 11 group A [two complete responses and nine partial responses (PRs)] and four group B (all PRs) patients, for response rates of 31% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17%, 49%) and 11% (95% CI 3%, 26%), respectively. Median survival and progression-free survival times were 7.1 (95% CI 6, 10.5) versus 3.5 (95% CI 3.1, 5.7) months, and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6, 5.3) versus 1.6 (95% CI 1.4, 2.8) months for group A versus B. CONCLUSION: The irinotecan/gemcitabine combination is active and well tolerated as second-line therapy in SCLC patients. Additional studies are warranted as second-line therapy in patients who progressed 90 days or more after first-line therapy. However, the observed efficacy results in refractory SCLC patients indicate that this regimen should not be further explored in this population.

Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus irinotecan or docetaxel in stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the activity and tolerability of gemcitabine plus irinotecan or docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, plus either irinotecan 100 mg/m2 or docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 80 enrolled patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, 78 were evaluable for activity and safety. Overall response rates, consisting of partial responses, were 12.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4% to 35%] for gemcitabine-irinotecan and 23.1% (95% CI 10% to 42%) for gemcitabine-docetaxel. Median overall survival was 7.95 months (95% CI 5.2-10.2) and 12.8 months (95% CI 7.9-17.1) for gemcitabine-irinotecan and gemcitabine-docetaxel, respectively. The corresponding estimated 1-year survivals were 23% and 51%, respectively. The 2-year survival rate in arm A (gemcitabine-irinotecan) is not currently estimable. The 2-year survival rate for arm B (gemcitabine-docetaxel) is 22% (95% CI 6% to 37%). Both combinations were well tolerated; the most common hematological toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 26% of patients in each treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that gemcitabine plus docetaxel or irinotecan is well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. The survival data with the combination gemcitabine-docetaxel are promising. Gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy may be particularly useful for patients who have experienced toxicities with a platinum regimen or in patients who may be more susceptible to platinum-related toxicity.

Beyond pancreatic cancer: irinotecan and gemcitabine in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Non-platinum combinations including gemcitabine and irinotecan (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) for the management of a variety of malignancies have started to emerge. Gemcitabine and irinotecan are well-tolerated single agents, each with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity. Preclinical data suggests synergy for the two drugs when used in combination. A phase I trial has defined a well-tolerated combination regimen using both drugs on a day-1, -8 schedule every 3 weeks. Phase II data suggest activity for the combination in pancreatic cancer, and a phase III trial of the two-drug combination versus gemcitabine alone is underway in previously untreated pancreatic cancer patients. Other phase II trials evaluating the impact of this combination on a variety of other tumors, such as non-small cell lung, small cell lung, breast, colorectal, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, are either forthcoming or in progress. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 10):34-43.

Irinotecan/gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) and irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) are active cytotoxic drugs against pancreatic cancer. Preclinical data evaluating the combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan suggest dose-dependent synergistic interactions in SCOG small-cell lung cancer and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Two phase I trials of this combination have been reported to date: the day 1 and 8 every-3-week schedule (IrinoGem trial), and the day 1, 8, and 15 every-4-week schedule (MSKCC trial). Both trials aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan when administered as a 90-minute i.v. infusion either immediately after (IrinoGem) or before or immediately after (MSKCC) gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute i.v. infusion in patients with solid tumors. The achieved maximum tolerated dose of IrinoGem has a higher dose intensity of irinotecan (100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every-3-week cycle) compared with the MSKCC schedule (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, every-4-week trial). In IrinoGem, two of three previously untreated metastatic pancreas cancer patients had durable radiologic partial responses. The third had stable disease with clinical benefit for eight cycles. In addition, a patient with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary--potentially pancreatic--has had a durable response and is alive more than 30 months after the diagnosis. Preliminary results of a 45-patient multicenter phase II trial with IrinoGem in advanced and metastatic pancreas cancer were recently reported. Toxicity was modest, with no toxic deaths or neutropenic fever. Radiologic response rate was 20% of patients (9 out of 45), and a CA 19-9 decrease of more than 50% from baseline values occurred in 32.5% of patients (13 out of 40). Median survival was 6 months (range: 0.9 to 12.2+ months) and median time to treatment failure was 2.9 months (range: 0.1 to 11.3+ months). A pivotal international multicenter phase III trial comparing IrinoGem to single-agent gemcitabine in advanced and metastatic pancreas cancer is ongoing.

Docetaxel followed by gemcitabine and irinotecan in solid tumors.

Docetaxel (Taxotere), gemcitabine (Gemzar), and irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) are active single agents in a variety of solid tumors. In combination, synergism may be schedule dependent. Preclinical studies suggested synergistic interactions when docetaxel was administered 24 hours before gemcitabine or irinotecan. The objective of this phase I trial in patients with refractory solid tumors was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel followed 24 hours later by gemcitabine and irinotecan. Two different schedules were tested: docetaxel escalated by 5 mg/m2/cohort from an initial dose of 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (schedule A) or escalated by 15 mg/m2/cohort from 45 mg/m2 on day 8 only (schedule B). In both schedules, docetaxel was given over 1 hour. Gemcitabine and irinotecan were given on days 2 and 9 (arm A) or 1 and 9 (arm B) at fixed doses of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes and 100 mg/m2 over 90 minutes, respectively. Escalation of docetaxel was planned in groups of three patients, with three additional patients added at the first indication of dose-limiting toxicity. Four dose levels in arm A and one dose level in arm B have been tested. Seventeen patients were evaluable in arm A; one died of an unrelated cause on cycle 1, and another withdrew consent before beginning treatment. Five of six patients were evaluable in arm B; one patient inadvertently received G-CSF on cycle 1. Forty-two cycles have been delivered in arm A (mean; 2.2 cycles/patient), and 25 cycles in arm B (mean, 4.2 cycles/patient); the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel on arm A was 20 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 diarrhea in one patient, grade 3 infection in two patients, and grade 4 neutropenia for > 4 days in one patient at the 25 mg/m2 level. The dose-limiting toxicities on arm B occurred at the first dose level and included grade 3 diarrhea in one patient, grade 4 diarrhea in one patient, and grade 4 neutropenia for 4 days in another patient. Accrual to schedule B was closed after testing the cohort 1 dose level because testing of a single deescalated docetaxel dose given on day 8 was not considered clinically relevant.

Limited small-cell lung cancer: a potentially curable disease.

Patients with limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung are treated with combined-modality therapy with the intent to cure. Standard therapy consists of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, thoracic irradiation, and for responders, prophylactic cranial irradiation. Despite this aggressive approach, too few patients achieve 5-year survival. In the past several years, new chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes and the topoisomerase I inhibitors, have demonstrated substantial activity against small-cell carcinoma. These agents are now being incorporated into clinical trials for patients with limited-stage disease. The best combination of these agents with platinum-based regimens is yet to be determined, and data supporting increased survival are awaited. Other studies are exploring thoracic radiation issues. Questions remain regarding optimal timing, dose, volume, and fractionation schemes. The most effective combination of thoracic irradiation and the newer chemotherapy agents also remains to be determined. The current approach to limited-stage small-cell carcinoma is reviewed, ongoing trials are described, and future directions are explored.

Radiation and chemotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Nearly 50,000 people in the United States will be diagnosed with stage III non-small cell lung cancer during the year 2000. Over the past 10 years, combined modality therapy has become the standard of care for primary treatment of most of these patients. Numerous studies and meta-analyses document an improvement in survival for patients with stage III disease treated with sequential chemotherapy followed by chest radiation, compared with radiation alone. Some more recent studies have shown a further improvement in survival when the chemotherapy and full-dose radiation are given concurrently. Acute toxicity is increased compared with sequential chemotherapy followed by radiation, but late toxicities seem similar. A current question under study is whether the use of initial chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy will further improve median and overall survival compared with immediate concurrent therapy alone.

Advances in treatment of inoperable NSCLC: gemcitabine doublets--a promising alternative.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) was originally approved for use in combination with cisplatin (Platinol) for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Research began to focus on combining gemcitabine with newer drugs, such as carboplatin (Paraplatin), vinorelbine (Navelbine), the taxanes, and the camptothecins, when it became clear that these agents had potentially increased efficacy and fewer side effects than the standard treatment. This article will briefly review the original experience with the gemcitabine/cisplatin doublet and then examine the experience to date with non-cisplatin-based gemcitabine doublet combinations in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Irinotecan in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Synergy with no overlapping toxicities has been demonstrated for the combination of irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) and gemcitabine (Gemzar) in vitro. Results of a single-institution phase I study in which patients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer were given irinotecan and gemcitabine were promising, with two of three patients achieving a partial response. Because of the favorable outcome of the phase I study, a multicenter phase II trial was undertaken in previously untreated patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Data from other sites entering patients in this phase II study have been analyzed, and a multicenter phase III trial of single-agent gemcitabine vs the irinotecan combination in first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer is underway.

Single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine/irinotecan combination (irimogem) in non-small cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine is a fluoridated pyrimidine related to cytosine arabinoside that has significant activity in solid tumor models. Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog with an active metabolite, SN-38, which inhibits topoisomerase I activity by stabilizing the topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complex. Gemcitabine studies in non-small cell lung cancer conducted in the United States, as well as an international collaboration and clinical trials from Europe and Japan, found overall response rates of 20% to 26%, a median duration of response between 5 to 9 months, and a median duration of survival ranging from 7 to 12.3 months. Gemcitabine also has been shown to be more effective than best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer. In a phase I trial of irinotecan (50, 75, 100, and 115 mg/m2) in combination with 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, three patients had documented partial responses: one with pancreas cancer at irinotecan 100 mg/m2, one with pancreas cancer, and one with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary at irinotecan 115 mg/m2. Three of five non-small cell lung cancer patients had stable disease for four or more cycles at irinotecan doses of 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2; no non-small cell lung cancer patients were treated at irinotecan 115 mg/m2. We recommend that a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks be used as the starting dose in future phase II studies. Furthermore, based on the absence of severe nonhematologic toxicity or grade IV hematologic toxicity in the majority of patients treated at the highest dose, escalation of irinotecan to 115 mg/m2 may be considered for subsequent cycles in patients who do not experience > or =grade I hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity during the first cycle of gemcitabine/irinotecan combination chemotherapy.

The 1997 International Staging System for non-small cell lung cancer: have all the issues been addressed?

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer has been revised recently. Important changes have been made to allow better correlation of prognoses and direction of management. The classification of synchronous pulmonary nodules in the same lobe as the primary tumor as T4 stage IIIB may imply a poorer outcome than is warranted, while the designation of a similar stage for malignant pleural effusion may not be reflective of the very poor prognosis associated with this extent of disease.

Synergistic effect of gemcitabine and irinotecan (CPT-11) on breast and small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Gemcitabine (2'-2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC), an analog of deoxycytidine, is an antineoplastic agent with clinical activity against several types of cancer. Irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is a drug with a broad spectrum of anticancer activity. Since these drugs have different mechanisms of cytotoxicity and dose-limiting toxicity profiles, preclinical combination studies were performed on the MCF-7 breast cancer and the SCOG small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines. Both gemcitabine and CPT-11 as single agents were effective growth inhibitors in these cell lines. Isobologram analysis revealed for the first time that the combination of these drugs exerted synergy over a wide range of concentrations in MCF-7 and SCOG cells. Moreover, combination index (CI) analysis revealed that at low concentrations, combinations of gemcitabine and CPT-11 show a synergistic growth inhibitory effect on MCF-7 cells. However, in SCOG cells CI analysis showed synergy at concentrations of gemcitabine and CPT-11 greater than 1 microM but antagonism at combination concentrations less than 1 microM. These preclinical cytotoxicity data provide an experimental basis for conducting clinical trials using combinations of gemcitabine and CPT-11, especially in patients with breast and lung cancers.