Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 43(2): 101348, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19 is a major complication which might impact survival. We aimed to determine the prevalence of PE and assess its impact of PE on clinical outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19. METHODS: All intubated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Geneva University Hospitals between March 9, 2020, and May 31, 2022, were included. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the occurrence of PE and its association with clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days during the first 28 days after ICU admission. Linear regressions were performed to investigate the association between PE and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 370 intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19, 58 (15.7%) presented with PE. Patients with PE had significantly fewer ventilator-free days than patients without PE (median (IQR) of 3 (0-11) days versus 12 (0-19) days; p < 0.001). Mortality did not differ significantly between groups (12/58 [20.7%] of patients with PE versus 71/312 [22.8%] of patients without PE; p = 0.72). Duration of IMV, and ICU and hospital LOS were significantly longer among patients with PE. The need for ECMO support was similar among both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of PE in patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 had a significant impact on clinical outcomes. They had fewer ventilator-free days, longer duration of IMV, and longer ICU and hospital lengths of stay. However, pulmonary embolism was not associated with higher mortality. ETHICS APPROVAL: Ethical committee of Geneva (BASEC #: 2020-00917).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Intensive Care Units
2.
J Clin Med ; 12(10)2023 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37240549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fever is extremely common in neurocritical care patients and is independently associated with a worse outcome. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) lower the hypothalamic set point temperature through the inhibition of prostaglandin E2 synthesis, and they constitute a second line of pharmacological treatment for temperature control. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DCF in reducing body temperature and its effects on brain parameters. METHODS: A comprehensive search of several databases was run in November 2022 in Ovid EBM (Evidence Based Medicine) Reviews, Cochrane library, Ovid Medline and Scopus (1980 onward). The outcome of interest included DCF control of body temperature and its impact on cerebral parameters. RESULTS: A total of 113 titles were identified as potentially relevant. Six articles met eligible criteria and were reviewed. DCF induce a reduction in body temperature (MD, 1.10 [0.72, 1.49], p < 0.00001), a slight decrease in ICP (MD, 2.22 [-0.25, 4.68] IC 95%; p < 0.08) as well as in CPP and MAP (MD, 5.58 [0.43, 10.74] IC 95%; p < 0.03). The significant heterogeneity and possibility of publication bias reduces the strength of the available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Diclofenac sodium is effective in reducing body temperature in patients with brain injury, but data in the literature are scarce and further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of DCF.

3.
J Clin Med ; 8(10)2019 Sep 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547597

ABSTRACT

Previous experimental studies showed that increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) cholesterol shortens cardiac ventricular repolarization and the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc). However, little is known about the epidemiological relationship between HDL and QTc. The potential antiarrhythmic effect of HDL cholesterol remains a speculative hypothesis. In this cross-sectional population based study in adults living in the Italian-speaking part of Switzerland, we aimed to explore the association between HDL cholesterol and the QTc interval in the general population. A total of 1202 subjects were screened. electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, measurements of lipid parameters and other laboratory tests were performed. QTc was corrected using Bazett's (QTcBaz) and Framingham (QTcFram) formulas. HDL was categorized according to percentile distributions: <25th (HDL-1; ≤1.39 mmol/L); 25th-<50th (HDL-2; 1.40-1.69 mmol/L); 50th-<75th (HDL-3; 1.69-1.99 mmol/L); and ≥75th (HDL-4; ≥2.0 mmol/L). After exclusion procedures, data of 1085 subjects were analyzed. Compared with the HDL reference group (HDL-1), HDL-2 and HDL-3 were associated with a reduction of QTcBaz and QTcFram duration in crude (HDL-2, QTcBaz/QTcFram: ß-11.306/-10.186, SE 4.625/4.016; p = 0.016/0.012; HDL-3, ß-12.347/-12.048, SE 4.875/4.233, p = 0.012/<0.001) and adjusted (HDL-2: ß-11.697/-10.908, SE 4.333/4.151, p < 0.001/0.010; HDL-3 ß-11.786/-11.002, SE 4.719/4.521, p = 0.014/0.016) linear regression models in women. In adjusted logistic regression models higher HDL, were also associated with lower risk of prolonged QTcBaz/QTcFram (HDL-2: OR 0.16/0.17, CI 0.03-0.83/0.47-0.65; HDL-3: OR 0.10/0.14, CI 0.10-0.64/0.03-0.63) in women. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a non linear association (p < 0.001). The present findings indicate an epidemiological association between HDL cholesterol and QTc duration. To draw firm conclusions, further investigations in other populations and with a prospective cohort design are needed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...