Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: As breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use grows, benchmark performance parameters are needed for auditing and quality assurance purposes. We describe the variation in breast MRI abnormal interpretation rates (AIRs) by clinical indication among a large sample of US community practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 41 facilities across five Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium imaging registries. Each registry obtained institutional review board approval for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant analysis. We included 11,654 breast MRI examinations conducted in 2005-2010 among women aged 18-79 years. We categorized clinical indications as 1) screening, 2) extent of disease, 3) diagnostic (eg, breast symptoms), and 4) other (eg, short-interval follow-up). We characterized assessments as positive (ie, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] 0, 4, and 5) or negative (ie, BI-RADS 1, 2, and 6) and provide results with BI-RADS 3 categorized as positive and negative. We tested for differences in AIRs across clinical indications both unadjusted and adjusted for patient characteristics and registry and assessed for changes in AIRs by year within each clinical indication. RESULTS: When categorizing BI-RADS 3 as positive, AIRs were 21.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.8-22.3) for screening, 31.7% (95% CI, 29.6-33.8) for extent of disease, 29.7% (95% CI, 28.3-31.1) for diagnostic, and 27.4% (95% CI, 25.0-29.8) for other indications (P < .0001). When categorizing BI-RADS 3 as negative, AIRs were 10.5% (95% CI, 9.5-11.4) for screening, 21.8% (95% CI, 19.9-23.6) for extent of disease, 17.7% (95% CI, 16.5-18.8) for diagnostic, and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) for other indications (P < .0001). The significant differences in AIRs by indication persisted even after adjusting for patient characteristics and registry (P < .0001). In addition, for most indications, there were no significant changes in AIRs over time. CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI AIRs differ significantly by clinical indication. Practices should stratify breast MRI examinations by indication for quality assurance and auditing purposes.

Two-dimensional sonographic cine imaging improves confidence in the initial evaluation of the fetal heart.

OBJECTIVES: Initial screening sonography of the fetal heart with static images is often inadequate, resulting in repeated imaging or failure to detect abnormalities. We hypothesized that the addition of short cine clips would reduce the need for repeated imaging. METHODS: Two-dimensional (2D) static sonograms and short 2D cine clips of the 4-chamber view and left and right ventricular outflow tracts were obtained from 342 patients with gestational ages of greater than 16 weeks. A diagnostic radiologist and a perinatologist retrospectively reviewed the static and cine images independently and graded them as normal, abnormal, or suboptimal. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in the number of structures called normal was seen when 2D cine clips were added to static imaging for both observers (P < .05); the radiologist called 86.5% normal with combined static and cine images versus 61.9% with static images alone, whereas the perinatologist recorded 68.1% as normal versus 58.8%, respectively. The radiologist called 77.8% of structures normal with cine images only versus 61.9% with static images only (P < .001), whereas the perinatologist called fewer structures normal with cine images alone (38.9%) versus static images alone (58.8%). The use of cine loops alone resulted in no significant increase in the ability to clear the heart as normal. The maternal body mass index was inversely associated with the ability to clear structures when 2D cine images were added to static images (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 2D cine clips to standard 2D static imaging of the fetal heart significantly improves the number of structures cleared as normal. Two-dimensional cine clips are easily obtained, add little time to a study, and require minimal archival space.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation and posttreatment imaging evaluation.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a technique that allows irradiation of only that part of the breast that is at greatest risk for recurrence of breast cancer. Because only a portion of the breast is irradiated, APBI can be performed in a relatively short period of time, usually in 5 days rather than the traditional 6 weeks. When used in carefully selected patients, APBI also allows normal portions of the breast parenchyma and regional vital organs to be spared from unnecessary irradiation. Common post-APBI imaging findings include focal skin thickening, seroma, scar, and skin retraction. Studies are underway that will compare a cohort of patients who underwent whole-breast irradiation with a cohort who underwent APBI to help determine whether the two techniques lead to significantly different imaging findings. Additional multicenter studies will be needed to document and analyze any such differences. In the future, APBI may play a significant role in selected patients, with pretherapy dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast possibly aiding in the selection process.