Addressing inadequate blood flow during normothermic regional perfusion for in-situ donation after circulatory death grafts preservation.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has emerged as attainable strategy to tackle the issue of organ shortage, expanding the donor pool. The DCD concept has been applied to the multiple declinations of circulatory arrest, as per the Modified Maastricht Classification. Notwithstanding, whichever the scenario, DCD donors experience a variable warm ischemia time whose correlation with graft dysfunction is ascertained. This applies to both "controlled" (cDCD) donors (i.e., the timespan from the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies to the onset of in-situ perfusion), and "uncontrolled" DCD (uDCD) (i.e., the low-flow period during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - CPR). This sums up to the no-flow time from cardiac arrest to the start of CPR for uDCD donors, and to the no-touch period for both uDCDs and cDCDs. Static and hypothermic storage may not be appropriate for DCD grafts. In order to overcome this ischemic insult, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices are adopted to guarantee the in-situ grafts preservation by means of techniques such as the normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) which consists in a selective abdominal perfusion obtained via the endovascular or surgical occlusion of the thoracic aorta. The maintenance of an adequate pump flood throughout NRP is therefore a sine qua non to accomplish the DCD donation. The issue of insufficient pump flow during NRP is prevalent and clinically significant but its management remains technically challenging and not standardized. Hereby we propose a systematic algorithmic approach to address this relevant occurrence.

Myocardial protection during minimally invasive cardiac surgery through right mini-thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial damage is an independent predictor of adverse outcome following cardiac surgery and myocardial protection is one of the key factors to achieve successful outcomes. Cardioplegia with Custodiol is currently the most used cardioplegia during minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Different randomized controlled trials compared blood and Custodiol cardioplegia in the context of traditional cardiac surgery. No data are available for MICS. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cold blood versus Custodiol cardioplegia during MICS. METHOD: We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients undergoing MICS through a right mini-thoracotomy in a three-year period. Myocardial protection was performed using cold blood (44 patients, CBC group) or Custodiol (46 patients, Custodiol group) cardioplegia, based on surgeon preference and complexity of surgery. RESULTS: The primary outcomes were post-operative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase MB (CKMB) serum release and the incidence of Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS). Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were higher in the Custodiol group. No difference was observed in myocardial injury enzyme release (peak cTnI value was 18±46 ng/ml in CBC and 21±37 ng/ml in Custodiol; p=0.245). No differences were observed for mortality, LCOS, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias onset, transfusions, mechanical ventilation time duration, intensive care unit and total hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Custodiol and cold blood cardioplegic solutions seem to assure similar myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy approach.