Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(5_suppl): 462S-466S, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610698

ABSTRACT

The objective of our study was to assess the relationship between postoperative opioid prescribing patterns and opioid consumption among patients who underwent septoplasty or rhinoplasty. A chart review of patients who underwent either septoplasty or rhinoplasty by 3 surgeons between July 2016 and June 2017 was performed, and pertinent clinical data were collected including the amount of narcotic pain medications prescribed. A telephone interview was then conducted to assess opioid usage and pain control regimen postoperatively. The number of opioid tablets prescribed and the number consumed were converted to total morphine milligram equivalent (MME) for uniform comparison. A total of 75 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 64 completed the telephone survey. Among these 64 patients, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) prescribed MME was 289.7 (101.3), and the mean (SD) consumed MME was 100.6 (109). Similarly, the mean (SD) number of opioid tablets prescribed was 42.4 (9.7), and the mean number of tablets consumed was 14.7 (16.3). Gender, procedure performed (septoplasty or rhinoplasty), use of Doyle splints, and surgeon were not associated with the amount of opioids prescribed or used. Subjective pain control was the only factor associated with an increase in opioid use (P = .0288). There was an overabundance of opioid pain medications prescribed compared to the amount consumed for pain control after septoplasty or rhinoplasty. Abuse of prescription opioids represents an important component of the nation's opioid crisis. Surgeons must be cognizant of the problem and adjust prescribing practices accordingly.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Nasal Septum/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Rhinoplasty/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Period , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 253S-258S, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32804571

ABSTRACT

Otophyma is a rare condition that can result in conductive hearing loss. Current otophyma literature does not examine validated treatment outcomes for patients. Utilizing a medical and surgical approach to maintain a patent canal can lead to significant objective improvements. The aim of this case series is to describe a combined successful approach in 3 cases from an academic, multidisciplinary center. The main outcomes analyzed were pre and post air-bone gap audiogram analysis and disimpaction frequency. The results showed that post-management, patient 1 had substantial improvement in hearing, recovering 49 dB in his right ear and 25 dB in his left ear, demonstrating near complete air-bone gap closure. Patient 2 showed a similar dermatologic and functional improvement, although objective audiometric assessment related to otophyma could not be performed due to coexisting chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma. Patient 3, in the 12 months prior to comanagement, had 8 bilateral disimpactions, and following comanagement had 2 disimpactions in 23 months. All 3 patients were pleased with the resultant functional and physical appearance following comanagement. By presenting this approach and objective measures of treatment, we hope to improve future clinical decision-making in a rare condition.


Subject(s)
Ear Deformities, Acquired/therapy , Hearing Loss, Conductive/therapy , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Retinoids/therapeutic use , Rosacea/therapy , Adult , Bone Conduction , Combined Modality Therapy , Ear Deformities, Acquired/etiology , Ear Deformities, Acquired/pathology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/etiology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/pathology , Humans , Male , Medical Illustration , Middle Aged , Rosacea/complications , Rosacea/pathology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(3): 538-545, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the microRNA (miRNA) expression profile of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) tumors from aggressive head and neck locations compared with nonaggressive anatomic sites and normal controls. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of miRNA expression. SETTING: Tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Tissue samples were collected from 3 anatomic regions: aggressive head and neck sites (ie, ears/lip), nonaggressive locations (ie, extremities/trunk), and adjacent normal skin. RNA was isolated from tissue cores of 45 samples (18 aggressive sites, 15 nonaggressive sites, and 12 normal-adjacent skin). miRNA expression analysis was completed for approximately 800 miRNAs using the NanoString nCounter panel. Five candidate miRNAs were selected for validation. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on the original samples plus 30 additional tissue samples (7 aggressive sites, 14 nonaggressive sites, and 9 normal-adjacent skin). RESULTS: Five candidate miRNAs with significant differences in miRNA expression (P < 0 ≤ .001) from discovery samples were selected: miR-21, miR-31, let-7g, miR-93, and miR-22. Relative expression for these miRNAs using qRT-PCR in the new sample set did not reveal any significant differences using 1-way analysis of variance. When sets were combined, miR-21 showed increased expression in aggressive tumors relative to nonaggressive tumors (P = .009), but no others reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: cSCC behaves more aggressively when originating from specific anatomical subsites of the head and neck. Of 5 miRNAs evaluated, only miR-21 showed significantly higher expression in tumors from aggressive sites relative to nonaggressive sites. Larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate other miRNAs.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/metabolism , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , MicroRNAs/genetics , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(2): 229-234, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688613

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine opioid prescribing patterns and consumption among patients undergoing common otologic surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with chart review and telephone survey. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Retrospective chart review and telephone survey of those undergoing tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, stapedectomy, and cochlear implantation in 2018. The survey consisted of questions regarding the details of the number of pills taken, duration of opioid use, subjective pain control, the use of over-the-counter pain medications, opioid disposal, and their history of substance abuse. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were able to be contacted and agreed to participate in the study. Fifty-nine (96.7%) stated that their pain was controlled, and 10 (16.4%) did not take any opioids postoperatively despite their prescription. The mean morphine milligram equivalent (MME) prescribed was 99.9 (44.3) and MME taken was 45.2 (SD 46.3) (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean number of pills prescribed was 17.8 (SD 8.6) and mean taken was 7.9 (SD 8.3) (p < 0.001). Comparison between males and females regarding MME and pills prescribed and taken were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05). Analysis of the MME and pills prescribed and taken among the different surgeries (tympanoplasty, stapes surgery, tympanomastoidectomy, and cochlear implantation) revealed no statistically significant interactions (p > 0.05). Pain control was achieved for 50% of patients with 5 pills (MME = 25 mg), for 75% with 12 pills (MME = 60 mg), and for 90% with 24 pills (MME = 135 mg). CONCLUSION: The opioid epidemic continues to be an ongoing issue in the United States, and prescription opioid abuse is a large contributor. There is increasing literature to suggest a practice of overprescribing in multiple surgical specialties. This same finding appears to be present in common otologic surgeries, where on average patients took less than half of the prescribed MME/pills, and 75% of patients had their pain controlled with 12 pills or fewer. Otolaryngologists performing otologic surgery should strongly consider adjusting their postoperative regimens to reflect these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Pain, Postoperative , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prescriptions , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...