Outcomes and prognostic factors for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: analysis of patients from the National Cancer Data Base.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess survival and prognostic factors for anal carcinoma in the population. METHODS: Patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (1985-2000). Univariate and multivariable methods were used to assess factors associated with survival. Concordance was calculated to assess agreement between American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and actual outcome. RESULTS: Nineteen thousand one hundred ninety-nine patients with anal carcinoma were identified (Stage I, 25.3 percent; Stage II, 51.8 percent; Stage III, 17.1 percent; Stage IV, 5.7 percent). Overall five-year survival was 58.0 percent. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (6th edition) staging system provided good survival discrimination by stage: I, 69.5 percent; II, 59.0 percent; III, 40.6 percent; and IV, 18.7 percent (concordance index, 0.663). On multivariable analysis, patients with anal carcinoma had a higher risk of death if they were male, >or=65 years old, black, living in lower median incomes areas, and had more advanced T stage tumors, nodal or distant metastases, or poorly differentiated cancers (P < 0.0001). There was not a significant difference in survival by hospital type or year of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Although tumor characteristics and staging affect prognosis, patient factors, such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status, are also important prognostic factors for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal.

Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after cancer resections have been shown to be better for high-volume surgeons compared with low-volume surgeons; however, reasons for this relationship have been difficult to identify. The objective of this study was to assess studies examining the effect of surgeon training and experience on outcomes in surgical oncology. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess articles examining the impact of surgeon training, certification, and experience on outcomes. Studies were included if they examined cancer resections and performed multivariable analyses adjusting for relevant confounding variables. RESULTS: An extensive literature search identified 29 studies: 27 examined surgeon training/specialization, 1 assessed surgeon certification, and 4 evaluated surgeon experience. Of the 27 studies examining training/specialization, 25 found that specialized surgeons had better outcomes than nonspecialized surgeons. One study found that American Board of Surgery (ABS)-certified surgeons had better outcomes than noncertified surgeons. Of the two studies examining time since ABS certification, both found that increasing time was associated with better outcomes. Of the four studies that examined experience, three studies found that increasing surgeon experience was associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous studies have examined the impact of surgeon factors on outcomes, only a few cancers have been examined, and outcome measures are inconsistent. Most studies do not appear robust enough to support major policy decisions. There is a need for better data sources and consistent analyses which assess the impact of surgeon factors on a broad range of cancers and help to uncover the underlying reasons for the volume-outcome association.

Expression of a novel alternatively spliced UCP-2 transcript in osteogenic sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Development of chemoresistance is common in patients with osteogenic sarcoma (OGS); however, the underlying mechanism is largely unknown. Many anticancer drugs exert their therapeutic action by generating reactive oxygen radicals, which might be countered by the cancer cell through induction of uncoupling protein 2 (UCP-2). UCP-2 has been shown to be able to protect tumor cells from the cytotoxic actions of chemotherapeutic drugs. Because OGS is seldom completely cured by current chemotherapy regimens, we hypothesized that increased expression of UCP-2 underlies this phenomenon. The primary initial interest of our research was to evaluate the level of UCP-2 mRNA in OGS. METHODS: The level of UCP-2 mRNA was determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) comparing expression in normal-bone-derived specimens and OGS-derived specimens. Semiquantification of mRNA expression was achieved by radioactive RT-PCR. Nucleotide sequencing was performed using automated instruments. RESULTS: Interestingly, we failed to observe induction of UCP-2 mRNA in OGS tumor specimens and OGS-derived primary cell lines compared to the expression level in normal bone. However, we found expression of a hitherto unknown UCP-2 transcript in eight of eight OGS-derived and one EWS-derived cell lines and in nine of ten OGS biopsy specimens but in only one of six normal bone-derived specimens. Thus, tumor samples express both types (normal and the novel one) of UCP-2 mRNAs, whereas normal bone expresses only the wild-type form. Further experiments identified the novel mRNA species as an alternatively spliced UCP-2 transcript (termed UCP-2as). UCP-2as has a 22-nucleotide insertion from the 3' end of intron 3 that introduces an early stop codon in exon 4, which theoretically can produce a protein 79 amino acids long. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a hitherto unknown UCP-2 transcript. Expression of the novel transcript appears to be OGS-specific, implying a function advantageous to the tumor.