Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Thromb J ; 22(1): 30, 2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38539225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic complications are well known in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Over the years it has not been possible to reach a consensus on a possible prophylaxis of thromboembolic events during intensive therapy. Only the administration of enoxaparin was able to achieve evidence in the literature to date. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 173 childhood leukemia patients were treated over 20 years with a thromboembolic prophylaxis including enoxaparin and AT III during induction therapy with L-asparaginase and cortisone. RESULTS: We here report the effectiveness of administration of enoxaparin and AT III in childhood leukemia, showing a strikingly low prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (2.9%). Especially in adolescent patients, a particularly great need for AT III was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend thromboembolic prophylaxis with enoxaparin and AT III substitution during induction/reinduction therapy with L-asparaginase and glucocorticosteroids, especially from adolescence onwards.

2.
J Prof Nurs ; 36(5): 322-329, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33039065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identifying students' who are able to complete a rigorous course of study, graduate on time, and pass the NCLEX-RN© is a principle role of nursing program admissions teams. PURPOSE: To examine which preadmission factors predict students' success in the first semester of a baccalaureate nursing program. METHODS: Undergraduate students' data from the academic years 2013 to 2017 were analyzed (N = 927). Bivariate and multiple regression analyses were used to examine potential predictors of first semester course success, and scores on standardized NCLEX preparation exams. RESULTS: Preadmission cumulative GPA (OR = 3.82, 95% CI = 1.43-10.16) and prerequisite science GPA (OR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.14-5.78) predicted success in the pathopharmacology course. Preadmission cumulative GPA (OR = 6.53, 95% CI = 1.59-26.85) and TEAS composite score (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-1.22) predicted success in the health assessment course. Preadmission cumulative GPA (OR = 3.42, 95% CI = 1.18-9.92) and TEAS composite score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.10) predicted success in the foundations course. Higher preadmission cumulative GPA (B = 14.19, p < 0.01), prerequisite science GPA (B = 12.62, p < 0.01), and TEAS composite score (B = 0.48, p < 0.01) predicted a higher pathopharmacology-KAPLAN, Inc. test scores. Higher preadmission cumulative GPA (B = 62.52, p < 0.01), prerequisite science GPA (B = 61.18, p < 0.01), and TEAS composite score (B = 4.76, p < 0.01) predicted a higher fundamentals-HESI test scores. CONCLUSIONS: Preadmission cumulative GPA, prerequisite science GPA, and TEAS composite score were significant predictors of success in first semester courses and performance on standardized tests.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Achievement , Educational Measurement , Humans , Licensure, Nursing , School Admission Criteria
3.
AAPS J ; 17(4): 1019-24, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921938

ABSTRACT

A novel format was introduced at the recent AAPS NBC Workshop on Method Development, Validation and Troubleshooting in San Diego on 18th May 2014. The workshop format was initiated by Binodh De Silva; Marie Rock and Sherri Dudal joined the initiative to develop and chair the workshop. Questions were solicited by a variety of avenues, including a Linked-In Discussion Group. Once collated and clarified, the topics covered assay development, validation, and analysis of PK, Immunogenicity, and Biomarkers with an additional topic on alternative bioanalytical technologies. A panel of experts (workshop report co-authors) was assigned to each topic to bring forward thought-provoking aspects of each topic. The format of the workshop was developed to target the needs of bioanalytical scientists with intermediate to advanced experience in the field ranging to enable robust discussion and to delve deeper into the current bioanalytical hot topics. While the new format allowed for an interactive session with the topical discussion driven by the audience members, it did not foster equal discussion time for all of the proposed topics, especially Biomarkers and alternative LBA technologies.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Pharmacokinetics , Humans , Ligands , Validation Studies as Topic
4.
AAPS J ; 17(2): 277-88, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25549614

ABSTRACT

In September 2013, the FDA released a draft revision of the Bioanalytical Method Validation (BMV) Guidance, which included a number of changes to the expectations for bioanalysis, most notably the inclusion of biomarker assays and data. To provide a forum for an open, inclusive discussion of the revised draft BMV Guidance, the AAPS and FDA once again collaborated to convene a two-and-a-half day workshop during early December 2013 in Baltimore, MD, USA. The resulting format embodied extensive open discussion and each thematic session included only brief, concise descriptions by Agency and industry representatives prior to opening the floor discussion. The Workshop was built around four thematic sessions (Common Topics, Chromatographic, Ligand-Binding Assays, and Biomarkers) and a final session with international regulators, concluding with a review of the outcomes and recommendations from the thematic sessions. This Workshop report summarizes the outcomes and includes topics of agreement, those where the FDA will consider the Industry's perspective, and those where the workshop provided a first open dialogue. This article will be available to the bioanalytical community at http://www.aaps.org/BMV13 .


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Biological Assay/standards , Government Regulation , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Validation Studies as Topic
6.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 70: 408-14, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22854133

ABSTRACT

This paper summarizes the development and validation of five enzyme activity methods to assess the specific inhibition of human endogenous matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 (interstitial collagenase), MMP-2 (gelatinase A), MMP-3 (stromelysin 1), MMP-8 (collagenase 2) and MMP-13 (collagenase 3) by anti-Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) antibodies in human serum. These MMPs are of interest since antibodies against a therapeutic enzyme may cross-react with, and inactivate, the MMPs. The validated methods utilize spiked exogenous individual MMPs added to serum to determine if the serum inhibits MMP enzyme activity. Factors evaluated and optimized during development include pH, reaction time and temperature, inhibitor concentration for the positive control, and substrate and serum concentration. Characteristics established during validation for each MMP activity inhibition method included intra- and inter-assay precision and recovery, recovery in the pooled normal human serum samples, bench-top stability at room temperature and on wet ice, and assay cut-point determination. Precision results ranged from ~1 to 12% CV, recoveries of the activities of the exogenous MMPs ranged from ~84 to 90% and cut-point values ranged from 67 to 91%.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Biological Assay , Clostridium histolyticum/enzymology , Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Matrix Metalloproteinases/analysis , Microbial Collagenase/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Biological Assay/methods , Biological Assay/standards , Calibration , Cross Reactions , Enzyme Stability , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Matrix Metalloproteinase 1/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 1/immunology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 13/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 13/immunology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 2/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 2/immunology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 3/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 3/immunology , Matrix Metalloproteinase 8/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 8/immunology , Matrix Metalloproteinases/immunology , Microbial Collagenase/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/analysis , Recombinant Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Temperature , Time Factors
8.
Anal Biochem ; 300(2): 177-84, 2002 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11779109

ABSTRACT

Adverse reactions to medications account for a substantial number of hospitalizations and in some cases fatalities. The nature of the many drug-drug interactions caused by the inhibition of drug-metabolizing enzymes can now be predicted and examined with a greater deal of accuracy due to research developments in the understanding of the drug-metabolizing enzymes. However, the more troubling aspects of drug-drug interactions are the idiosyncratic reactions that are unpredictable and quite often life-threatening. These reactions are often caused by a prior sensitization of a person's immune system to a given drug or class of drugs. The following work offers a technique to examine in a medium-throughput system the cross-reactivity of drugs to antibodies in order to predict if structures share the same antigenic potential toward a sensitized individual. Two commercially important sulfonamide drugs, sulfamethazine and furosemide, were taken and their binding to their respective antibodies were tested in the presence of other structurally related sulfonamide drugs. The BIACORE 3000 biosensor was used for the study and the solution-phase equilibrium assay principle was employed. The data obtained help us determine which drugs can react, and to what extent, with sulfamethazine and furosemide, giving rise to possible allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. Though sulfamethazine and furosemide were used in this study; this principle and methodology can be applied to study any drug molecule-antibody pair.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques/methods , Cross Reactions/immunology , Sulfonamides/chemistry , Sulfonamides/immunology , Furosemide/chemistry , Furosemide/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Optics and Photonics , Sulfamethazine/chemistry , Sulfamethazine/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...