High permeability haemofiltration improves peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation in septic patients with acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (HF) with high permeability (HP) haemofilters is a novel approach in the adjuvant therapy of septic patients. HP haemofilters are characterized by an increased pore size which facilitates the filtration of inflammatory mediators. The present study examines whether HP-HF has an impact on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation and whether ultrafiltrate can alter PBMC function in isolates from healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-eight septic patients with acute renal failure were randomly allocated to either HP-HF or conventional HF (C-HF). HP-HF was performed with a newly developed high-flux polyamide membrane (P2SH) with a nominal cut-off point of 60 kDa. For C-HF, a high-flux polyamide haemofilter (Polyflux 11S; cut-off, 30 kDa) was used. RESULTS: Septic patients demonstrated a significantly reduced proliferation of anti-CD3-stimulated PBMCs compared to healthy controls (P = 0.016). Initiating HF led to a restoration of the PBMC proliferation in HP-HF but not in C-HF. Exposing PBMCs isolated from healthy donors to ultrafiltrates from patients with sepsis demonstrated a significant suppressive effect of HP ultrafiltrates on the anti-CD3-stimulated PBMC proliferation (P = 0.011). Ultrafiltrate from patients with sepsis who received C-HF had no impact on PBMC proliferation. CONCLUSION: HP-HF restores PBMC proliferation in septic patients probably by eliminating immunomodulatory mediators. HP-HF may represent a new renal replacement therapy able to modulate PBMC function in sepsis.

Intermittent high permeability hemofiltration in septic patients with acute renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: High permeability hemofiltration (HP-HF) is a new renal replacement modality designed to facilitate the elimination of cytokines in sepsis. Clinical safety data on this new procedure is still lacking. This study investigates the effects of HP-HF on the protein and coagulation status as well as on cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with septic shock. In addition, the clearance capacity for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is analyzed. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center pilot trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) induced by septic shock were studied. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated by intermittent high permeability hemofiltration (iHP-HF; nominal cut-off point: 60 kilodaltons). Intermittent HP-HF was performed over 5 days for 12 h per day and alternated with conventional hemofiltration. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intermittent HP-HF proved to be a safe hemofiltration modality in regard to cardiovascular hemodynamics and its impact on the coagulation status. However, transmembrane protein loss occurred and cumulative 12-h protein loss was 7.60 g (IQR: 6.2-12.0). The filtration capacity for IL-6 was exceptionally high. The IL-6 sieving coefficient approximated 1 throughout the study period. The total plasma IL-6 burden, estimated by area under curve analysis, declined over time ( p<0.001 vs baseline). The TNF-alpha elimination capacity was poor. CONCLUSIONS: High permeability hemofiltration is a new approach in the adjuvant therapy of sepsis that facilitates the elimination of cytokines. HP-HF alternating with conventional hemofiltration is well tolerated. Further studies are needed to analyze whether HP-HF is able to mitigate the course of sepsis.

Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration modulates inflammatory response in septic patients with multiorgan failure.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Continuous venovenous hemofiltration with high-permeability hemofilters is a novel approach in the adjuvant therapy of septic patients. High-permeability hemofilters are characterized by an increased pore size which facilitates the filtration of inflammatory mediators. The present study examines whether intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration has an immunomodulatory effect on polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear cells. METHODS: Twenty-eight septic patients with acute renal failure were randomly allocated to either receive intermittent high-permeability or conventional hemofiltration. Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration consisted of a daily 12-hour course of high-permeability hemofiltration alternated by conventional hemofiltration. For high-permeability hemofiltration, a newly developed high-flux polyamide membrane (P2SH) with a nominal cutoff point of 60 kD was used. For conventional hemofiltration a high-flux polyamide hemofilter (Polyflux 11S, cutoff point 30 kD) was used. RESULTS: The polymorphonuclear leukocyte phagocytosis activity before starting hemofiltration was almost double the rate of healthy controls in both groups (p < 0.001). The phagocytosis rate decreased significantly during the course of intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration (p < 0.05), whereas the values remained unchanged in the conventional hemofiltration group. Incubation of high-permeability filtrates with blood from healthy donors resulted in a significant induction of phagocytosis (p < 0.001), whereas conventional filtrates had no phagocytosis-stimulating effects. In addition, incubation of healthy-donor mononuclear cells with high-permeability but not conventional filtrates resulted in a significant tumor necrosis factor alpha release (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent high-permeability hemofiltration is a novel extracorporeal elimination modality which exhibits immunomodulatory effects on leukocytes, attenuating polymorphonuclear neutrophil phagocytosis. Further studies are necessary to elucidate whether these effects translate in a clinical improvement in patients suffering from sepsis.

TNF-alpha elimination with high cut-off haemofilters: a feasible clinical modality for septic patients?

BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapies with high cut-off haemofilters are new approaches in the adjuvant therapy of sepsis. We analysed the cytokine elimination capacity of a newly developed polyflux high cut-off haemofilter. Different renal replacement therapies are compared and tested for their clinical feasibility. METHODS: Blood from healthy volunteers (n=15) was incubated for 4 h with 1 mg of endotoxin and then circulated through a closed extracorporeal circuit. A newly developed polyflux haemofilter (P2SX) was used. Haemofiltration, haemodialysis and albumin dialysis were tested. IL-1ra (17 kDa), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (28 kDa), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) (51 kDa), albumin (64 kDa), creatinkinase (CK) (80 kDa) and IgG (140 kDa) were measured in blood and filtrates prior to the initiation and after 5 min, 1, 2 and 4 h. RESULTS: Haemofiltration was superior to haemodialysis in the clearance capacity of all substances when applied in the 1 l/h ultrafiltration mode. Increasing the ultrafiltration rate/dialysate flow from 1 to 3 l/h led to a significant increase in cytokine clearances (P<0.001). At 3 l/h the differences between haemofiltration and haemodialysis vanished and both techniques achieved comparable cytokine clearances. Median clearance values ranged between 25 and 54 ml/min for interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), 23 and 42 ml/min for IL-6 and 15 and 28 ml/min for TNF-alpha. Albumin loss was highest in the haemofiltration group with albumin clearances ranging between 7 and 13 ml/min. Using diffusion instead of convection significantly reduced the loss of albumin (P<0.01 for 1 l/h, P<0.05 for 3 l/h). Albumin dialysis was able to completely inhibit albumin loss but cytokine clearance capacity was limited. CONCLUSIONS: High cut-off haemofilters achieve high clearances for inflammatory IL-6 and TNF-alpha. Due to the high protein loss in haemofiltration, dialysis in combination with balanced protein substitution seems to be a suitable approach for clinical trials.

Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion difference.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians calculate the anion gap (AG) and the strong ion difference (SID) to make acid-base diagnoses. The technology used is assumed to have limited impact. The authors hypothesized that different measurement technologies markedly affect AG and SID values. METHODS: SID and AG were calculated using values from the point-of-care blood gas and electrolyte analyzer and the central hospital laboratory automated blood biochemistry analyzer. Simultaneously measured plasma sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations were also compared. RESULTS: Mean values for central laboratory and point-of-care plasma sodium concentration were significantly different (140.4 +/- 5.6 vs. 138.3 +/- 5.9 mm; P < 0.0001), as were those for plasma chloride concentration (102.4 +/- 6.5 vs. 103.4 +/- 6.0 mm; P < 0.0001) but not potassium. Mean AG values calculated with the two different measurement techniques differed significantly (17.6 +/- 6.2 mEq/l for central laboratory vs. 14.5 +/- 6.0 mEq/l for point-of-care blood gas analyzer; P < 0.0001). Using the Stewart-Figge methodology, SID values also differed significantly (43.7 +/- 4.8 vs. 40.7 +/- 5.6 mEq/l; P < 0.0001), with mean difference of 3.1 mEq/l (95% limits of agreement, -3.4, 9.5 mEq/l). For 83 patients (27.6%), differences in AG values were as high as 5 mEq/l or more, and for 46% of patients whose AG value was outside the reference range with one technology, a value within normal limits was recorded with the other. CONCLUSIONS: Results with two different measurement technologies differed significantly for plasma sodium and chloride concentrations. These differences significantly affected the calculated AG and SID values and might lead clinicians to different assessments of acid-base and electrolyte status.