Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 820, 2022 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35897060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Initial systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually based on two- or three-drug chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine), oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, combined with either anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) or, for RAS wild-type (WT) tumors, anti-EGFR antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Recommendations for patients who are not eligible for intensive combination therapies are limited and include fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab or single agent anti-EGFR antibody treatment. The use of a monochemotherapy concept of trifluridine/ tipiracil in combination with monoclonal antibodies is not approved for first-line therapy, yet. Results from the phase II TASCO trial evaluating trifluridine/ tipiracil plus bevacicumab in first-line treatment of mCRC patients and from the phase I/II APOLLON trial investigating trifluridine/ tipiracil plus panitumumab in pre-treated mCRC patients suggest favourable activity and tolerability of these new therapeutic approaches. METHODS: FIRE-8 ( NCT05007132 ) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II study which aims to evaluate the efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA), orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12, q28 days) plus either the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (6 mg/kg body weight, intravenously on day 1 and 15, q28 days) [arm A] or (as control arm) the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (5 mg/kg body weight, intravenously on day 1 and 15, q28 days) [arm B] in RAS WT mCRC patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate an improved objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 from 30% (control arm) to 55% with panitumumab. With a power of 80% and a two-sided significance level of 0.05, 138 evaluable patients are needed. Given an estimated drop-out rate of 10%, 153 patients will be enrolled. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab in first-line treatment of RAS WT mCRC patients. The administration of anti-EGFR antibodies rather than anti-VEGF antibodies in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil may result in an increased initial efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) 2019-004223-20 . Registered October 22, 2019, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05007132 . Registered on August 12, 2021.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Trifluridine , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Body Weight , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Fluorouracil , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Panitumumab/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyrrolidines , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Thymine , Trifluridine/therapeutic use
2.
Pneumologie ; 75(4): 284-292, 2021 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147639

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a huge burden on global health systems. Although far-reaching prevention measures such as the increase of intensive care capacities and drastic restrictions of public life have so far been able to avert an overload of the German health care system, the current situation implies an exceptionally high burden on medical professionals. The current study presents the results of an opinion evaluation among 513 pneumology specialists in Germany in the period from March 27th to April 11th, 2020. While the majority of respondents stated that Germany was "well" prepared for the pandemic, this assessment was significantly worse among participants from the outpatient sector compared to the hospital sector (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a lack of medical protective equipment was reported significantly more frequently by respondents from the outpatient sector (p < 0.001). The importance of telemedicine approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic was rated "high" (35.2 %) or "very high" (17.2 %) by most pneumology professionals, with participants from the hospital sector giving a higher rating (p < 0.001). Finally, 45.8 % of the respondents expressed a "negative" influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on their personal mood and 58.3 % expressed "strong" or "very strong" concerns about the health of their fellow human beings. This assessment was significantly stronger among female participants and participants from the nursing sector (p < 0.001). In summary, the current study analyses for the first time the professional and personal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pneumology professionals in Germany. The results could help to identify first starting points to better support health professionals during the current and future challenges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Medicine , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Perception , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Chirurg ; 89(11): 858-864, 2018 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30182267

ABSTRACT

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) is the second most common primary malignancy of the liver and is typically diagnosed at advanced disease stages. Among curative treatment options for CCC, radical surgical resection with extrahepatic bile duct resection, hepatectomy, and en-bloc lymphadenectomy are considered the mainstay of curative therapy. The assessment of the functional liver reserve by dynamic liver function tests and the estimation of the remaining future liver volume (future liver remnant, FLR) are of paramount importance. The introduction of novel interventional and surgical techniques, such as portal vein embolization, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), have enabled clinicians to achieve resectability even in patients previously deemed unresectable. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) shows acceptable results in small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) in liver cirrhosis and should be evaluated if cirrhosis precludes surgical treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE) alone or in combination with systemic therapy may be applied in cases of surgical irresectability. According to recent results of the British BILCAP trial, adjuvant therapy may be considered after surgical resection in curative intent.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Bile Duct Neoplasms , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Cholangiocarcinoma , Liver Neoplasms , Adult , Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy , Cholangiocarcinoma/therapy , Hepatectomy , Humans , Ligation , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Portal Vein , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...