Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neth Heart J ; 15(2): 45-50, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17612659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND.: Due to the shortage of donor hearts, mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as a bridge to transplantation. In order to allow for more widespread use of ventricular assist devices it is mandatory that patients are not continuously hospitalised. We present the results of our experience with patients with end-stage heart failure, discharged from hospital after implantation of a ventricular assist device and followed in an outpatient setting. METHODS.: After an intensive training and education programme, focusing on the management of the percutaneous driveline and instructions on how to handle in case of an alarm or malfunction of the device, patients were discharged. They were followed in the outpatient department. All regular and unplanned visits were registered, including readmissions. RESULTS.: Twenty-seven patients treated with a ventricular assist device were discharged from hospital. There were 37 extra visits, of these, 27 were device related resulting in 21 readmissions (0.78/patient). We treated eight infectious episodes in four patients, all device related. Furthermore seven thromboembolic episodes occurred in four patients. One patient died because of multiorgan failure seven weeks after he was readmitted with an urosepsis. In our experience of 11.4 patient years at home while on the device, only 5% of the time was spent in hospital for complications. In comparison with patients on an assist device who stayed in hospital until transplantation, there were no more complications. CONCLUSION.: This study demonstrates that patients with end-stage heart failure, treated with a ventricular assist device, can be safely discharged from hospital, with an acceptable rate of readmissions. It results in a fair quality of life, with a high degree of independence of the patient. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:45-50.).

2.
Neth Heart J ; 10(6): 267-271, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25696107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as bridge to heart transplantation (HTx) in patients with end-stage heart failure. METHOD: Between March 1993 and December 2001, 38 patients with refractory end-stage heart failure underwent HeartMate LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton Calif.) implantation. RESULTS: A total of 33 of the 38 patients (87%) survived the implantation and perioperative period. There were five perioperative deaths (13%), two due to right ventricular failure, two as a result of bleeding and one probably due to septic shock at the time of LVAD implantation. Three patients (9%) died late in the postoperative period due to septic shock, mechanical failure of the device and a cerebral embolus resulting from LVAD endocarditis, initiated by an acute cholecystitis. Twelve patients (32%) had one or more infectious episodes during long-term assist, of which one patient died. Four patients are still on the device, waiting for a heart transplantation. Twenty-six patients (76%) underwent HTx after 206±129 days of support. CONCLUSION: These results show the efficacy of LVAD support as a bridge to heart transplantation in patients with end-stage heart failure. Major long-term complications are infections and mechanical failure of the device.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...