Do we need to target 'prediabetic' hypertensive patients?

Patients at risk for diabetes development have been recently characterized as those presenting higher baseline serum glucose concentration, increased body mass index, elevated systolic blood pressure, reduced serum high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and those with history of prior use of antihypertensive drugs. Little is known, however, about the long-term outcome of patients at high risk for diabetes development, so-called 'prediabetic' patients. Prediabetes state has been defined as the presence of either impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose, and accumulating evidence suggests that individuals with a non-diabetic range of hyperglycaemia (prediabetic) are already at risk for cardiovascular diseases. This short review analyses the need of targeting 'prediabetic' hypertensive patients in order to develop strategies for cardiovascular protection intended to diminish the consequences of precipitating the development of diabetes and its cardiovascular and renal deleterious effects.

Effects of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive therapy on outcome in the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive treatment on the outcome of older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, we extended the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial by an open-label follow-up study lasting 4 years. METHODS: The Syst-Eur trial included 4695 randomized patients with minimum age of 60 years and an untreated blood pressure of 160-219 mmHg systolic and below 95 mmHg diastolic. The double-blind trial ended after a median follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1-97 months). Of 4409 patients still alive, 3517 received open-label treatment consisting of nitrendipine (10-40 mg daily) with the possible addition of enalapril (5-20 mg daily), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg daily), or both add-on drugs. Non-participants (n = 892) were also followed up. RESULTS: Median follow-up increased to 6.1 years. Systolic pressure decreased to below 150 mmHg (target level) in 2628 participants (75.0%). During the 4-year open-label follow-up, stroke and cardiovascular complications occurred at similar frequencies in patients formerly randomized to placebo and those continuing active treatment. These rates were similar to those previously observed in the active-treatment group during the double-blind trial. Considering the total follow-up of 4695 randomized patients, immediate compared with delayed antihypertensive treatment reduced the occurrence of stroke and cardiovascular complications by 28% (P = 0.01) and 15% (P = 0.03), respectively, with a similar tendency for total mortality (13%, P = 0.09). In 492 diabetic patients, the corresponding estimates of long-term benefit (P < 0.02) were 60, 51 and 38%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive treatment can achieve blood pressure control in most older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Immediate compared with delayed treatment prevented 17 strokes or 25 major cardiovascular events per 1000 patients followed up for 6 years. These findings underscore the necessity of early treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

Development of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular prognosis in essential hypertensive patients.

The existence of a significant percentage of treated hypertensive patients presenting a diminished renal function has been recently described. Mild renal function abnormalities are recognized as powerful predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, longitudinal data demonstrating this association are lacking. The objectives of this study have been analysis of the evolution of GFR, assessed as creatinine clearance (CrCl), during long-term follow-up of hypertensive patients and evaluation of the impact of the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on cardiovascular prognosis. A historical cohort of 281 patients attending our Hypertension Unit was selected according to the following criteria: essential hypertension, more than 5 yr of follow-up, and normal GFR at baseline (CrCl > 90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). Patients had an average follow-up of 13.2 +/- 4.8 yr. Forty-one patients (14.6%) developed CKD (CrCl < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) attributed to hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Initial serum creatinine, age, systolic BP at baseline, and average total cholesterol during follow-up were independent predictors of CKD development. Forty-nine (17.4%) of 281 patients presented a cardiovascular event during follow-up: 17 patients (40.6%) who developed CKD and 32 patients (13.3%) with preserved renal function (log rank test P < 0.001). After adjustment in a Cox multivariate analysis, age, development of CKD during follow-up, and male gender were independent predictors of the appearance of cardiovascular events. In essential hypertensive patients with normal renal function at baseline, the development of CKD during the follow-up is strongly and independently related with poor cardiovascular prognosis.

The KARTAN study: a postmarketing assessment of Irbesartan in patients with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: An important purpose of postmarketing surveillance of drugs is to better characterize the safety profile of drug therapy in the clinical setting. Another goal is to confirm the effectiveness of these drugs in patients who are candidates for antihypertensive therapy and who may have been excluded from Phase III studies. Irbesartan is a long-acting angiotensin II-receptor blocker specific for the angiotensin 1-receptor subtype that, in clinical trials in patients with hypertension, reduces blood pressure. OBJECTIVES: The KARTAN (this word was derived from the first and last syllables of Karvea [trademark of Bristol-Myers Squibb Group, Madrid, Spain] and irbesartan) study was designed to confirm and extend the findings from previous clinical trials using data from a large number of patients with hypertension treated with irbesartan in routine clinical practice. The primary goal was to assess the types and incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring at a low frequency (<0.05%) with irbesartan. The secondary objectives were to study the effect of irbesartan as an antihypertensive agent, to assess the types and incidences of the most frequent ADRs (>/=0.05%) occurring in routine clinical practice, and to detect possible interactions between irbesartan and other drugs frequently used in the primary care setting. METHODS: This 6-month, observational, open-label, uncontrolled, national, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted by 852 primary care physicians across Spain. Men and women aged >/=18 years with mild to moderate hypertension who, in their physicians' opinion, should have been treated with irbesartan were included. Each patient was followed up for 6 months, attending visits at baseline (ie, the start of treatment) and 1, 3, and 6 months after the start of treatment. A sample size of 3219 patients was calculated for the detection of >/=1 low-incidence (<0.05%) ADR. After the baseline visit, therapy typically was begun with irbesartan 150 mg/d. The initial dose was titrated up, at 300-mg increments based on the patient's response, at each visit as needed to achieve the treatment goals (systolic blood pressure, <140 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg). Information regarding ADRs was collected on case-report forms designed for each visit and analyzed by the scientific committee of the study. All recruited patients were included in the tolerability analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4887 patients were enrolled (2165 men, 2 772 women; mean [SD] age, 61.1 [11.0] years [range, 19-94 years]; 23.3% of patients were aged >70 years); 4612 were assessable for efficacy. One hundred eight patients (2.2%) experienced ADRs over the 6-month treatment period; 3 of these patients (0.1%) experienced >1 ADR. Of the total number of clinical manifestations of ADRs, 24 occurred at an incidence <0.05%. Irbesartan produced reductions in blood pressure that were statistically significant from the first visit (all p < 0.001), and 39.9% of the patients achieved the treatment goal at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In this postmarketing surveillance study of patients with hypertension treated in routine clinical practice, irbesartan showed a satisfactory tolerability profile that was consistent with that seen in randomized, controlled trials.

Hypertensive renal damage in metabolic syndrome is associated with glucose metabolism disturbances.

Recent evidence highlights the relationship between metabolic syndrome (MS) and increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Mild renal function abnormalities are associated with an enhanced CV risk, considered to be due to the presence of associated risk factors. Hence, MS and renal abnormalities could be linked and contribute to augment CV risk. For estimating the prevalence of diminished creatinine clearance (CC; <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) in hypertensive patients with or without MS and for investigating the factors accompanying this abnormality, 1625 hypertensive patients, aged 18 yr or older, were included. The presence of MS was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. The overall prevalence of MS was 49.4% (n = 802). No significant difference was found for CC between those with and without MS, albeit the presence of MS was accompanied by greater urinary albumin excretion (P = 0.01). The prevalence of a diminished CC was also similar in the two groups. MS-positive patients presented a progressive decay in CC when classified as normoglycemic (n = 319), impaired fasting glucose (n = 237), and diabetic patients (n = 246; 85.9 +/- 30.2, 81.8 +/- 26.8, and 75.2 +/- 25.7 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively; P = 0.0007 linearity test) and the opposite for microalbuminuria (29.5 +/- 45.5, 45.0 +/- 96.6, and 74.1 +/- 146.3 mg/24 h, respectively; P = 0.001 linearity test). In multiple regression analysis, factors related to the finding of a diminished CC in MS and non-MS patients were similar. Hypertensive patients at a relatively young age present with an elevated prevalence of minor abnormalities of renal function that is mostly related to the presence of metabolic alteration of glucose together with age and BP.

European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of eight societies and by invited experts).

Guidelines aim to present all the relevant evidence on a particular issue in order to help physicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. They should be helpful in everyday clinical decision-making. A great number of guidelines have been issued in recent years by different organisations--European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and other related societies. By means of links to web sites of National Societies several hundred guidelines are available. This profusion can put at stake the authority and validity of guidelines, which can only be guaranteed if they have been developed by an unquestionable decision-making process. This is one of the reasons why the ESC and others have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing guidelines. In spite of the fact that standards for issuing good quality guidelines are well defined, recent surveys of guidelines published in peer-reviewed journals between 1985 and 1998 have shown that methodological standards were not complied with in the vast majority of cases. It is therefore of great importance that guidelines and recommendations are presented in formats that are easily interpreted. Subsequently, their implementation programmes must also be well conducted. Attempts have been made to determine whether guidelines improve the quality of clinical practice and the utilisation of health resources. In addition, the legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed and examined, resulting in position documents, which have been published by a specific task force. The ESC Committee for practice guidelines (CPG) supervises and coordinates the preparation of new guidelines and expert consensus documents produced by task forces, expert groups or consensus panels. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement of these guidelines or statements.

Combination is better than monotherapy with ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist at recommended doses.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist (ARB) could provide a higher degree of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system(RAS) than either agent alone. The primary aim of this study was to look at the effect of three therapeutic regimens (titrated ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) versus titrated ARB versus the combination of an ACE-I and an ARB) on the attainment of adequate blood pressure (BP) control and antiproteinuric effect. Both ACE-I and ARB were titrated as monotherapy up to the maximal recommended dose. METHODS: A pilot randomised, parallel group open-label study was conducted in 36 patients with primary renal disease, proteinuria above 1.5 g/day and BP >140/90 mmHg while on therapy with an ACE-I. Patients were randomly assigned to (1) benazepril, n=12; (2) valsartan, n=12; or (3) benazepril plus valsartan, n=12. Other antihypertensive therapies could also be added to attain goal BP (<140/90 mmHg). The primary endpoint was the change in proteinuria during six months of follow-up. RESULTS: In the presence of similar BP decreases and stable creatinine clearance values, mean proteinuria decreases were 0.5+1.7, 1.2+2.0 and 2.5+1.8 g/day in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. When compared with baseline values, only the fall induced by the combination of ARB and ACE-I attained statistical significance (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The antiproteinuric capacity of monotherapy at recommended doses with either an ACE-I or an ARB is lower than that obtained with the combination of the two drugs.

Renal participation in cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension.

The kidney plays a relevant role in the origin of essential hypertension in humans, and it suffers the consequences of sustained elevated blood pressure in the absence of therapy. Recently, a relevant prevalence of mild renal insufficiency both in general population than in hypertensive patients has been described. A direct relationship seems to exist between the level of cardiovascular risk and the prevalence of the renal disorder, whether this is detected as an elevation in serum creatinine or as a diminution of estimated creatinine clearance. This renal function impairment is a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic heart failure and following myocardial infarction. Prevention of renal and cardiovascular damage in these patients will be one of the most relevant tasks in the future. The aim of this short review is to discuss the evidence in favor of a relevant prevalence of mild renal insufficiency in hypertensive patients, as well as the association of this disorder with a very significant increment in global cardiovascular risk.

Hyperuricemia, low urine urate excretion and target organ damage in arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia can be the consequence of an increased urate production, a decreased renal excretion, or both. An increased prevalence of hyperuricemia has been described in essential hypertensive patients partly due to a decreased renal urinary urate excretion (UUE). Hyperuricemia has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients in some but not in all epidemiological studies in which this relationship has been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of low UUE in the association between serum urate, renal function and hypertension severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in a sample of 677 male hypertensive patients, aged 35-60 years, with essential arterial hypertension consecutively attended in a hospital hypertension unit. The presence of hypertension-related organ damage at diagnosis was classified according to classical WHO criteria as grade 1, 2 or 3. Urate underexcretion was defined as 24-h urinary urate below the product serum urate x 100. RESULTS: Mean serum urate levels were 6.4 +/- 1.6 mg/dl in the total sample. Hyperuricemia (serum urate >7 mg/dl) was present in 28.5% of patients and only 17.0% had underexcretory hyperuricemia. This subgroup of patients exhibited the higher rate of hypertension-related target organ damage (TOD). A multivariate analysis, showed that underexcretory hyperuricemia but not hyperuricemia remained an independent predictor of TOD (odds ratio 2.5. 95% CI 1.6-3.89). Serum urate correlated positively with serum creatinine in hyperuricemic patients (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), but not in patients with underexcretory hyperuricemia (r = 0.21, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Underexcretory hyperuricemia is strongly related to hypertensive organ damage and this relationship does not seem to be mediated by a decreased renal function. This aspect could underline the predictive value of hyperuricemia independently of serum creatinine. UUE could improve the clinical predictive value of hyperuricemia as a cardiovascular risk factor.

Doxazosin GITS versus hydrochlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

The objective of this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm comparative study, with a 4-month follow-up, was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and metabolic safety of doxazosin GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 4-8 mg/day vs hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg/day as add-on therapy in patients not controlled with monotherapy with other drugs. Ninety-eight patients completed the study (mean age 57.4 +/- 15 years, 53% female). Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure reduction was 8.2/4.5 mmHg in the HCTZ group and 8.9/5.0 mmHg in the doxazosin GITS group, and a strict blood pressure control was achieved in 79% and 83% of the patients, respectively. The incidence rates of adverse events were low and similar in both groups. However, metabolic differences were seen between the groups, doxazosin GITS vs HCTZ, respectively: total cholesterol (mg/dl) 210 +/- 53 vs 231 +/- 62 (p < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dl) 139 +/- 40 vs 161 +/- 57 (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mg/dl) 58 +/- 16 vs 48 +/- 13 (p < 0.01), HDL/total cholesterol ratio 27.6 +/- 8 vs 21.2 +/- 7 (p < 0.001), plasma uric acid (mg/dl) 5.3 +/- 2.6 vs 6.8 +/- 3.1 (p < 0.05) and serum potassium (mEq/l) 4.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.2 (p < 0.01). In conclusion, doxazosin GITS has a tolerability and efficacy profile similar to low doses of thiazide diuretics, with a better evolution of metabolic and electrolyte parameters. Therefore, in patients not controlled with monotherapy, doxazosin GITS can be considered an alternative to the addition of thiazide diuretics.

Predictive value of clinic and ambulatory heart rate for mortality in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of clinic and ambulatory heart rate with total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular death in a cohort of elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial. METHODS: A total of 4682 patients participated, whose untreated blood pressure on conventional measurement at baseline was 160 to 219 mm Hg systolic and lower than 95 mm Hg diastolic. Clinic heart rate was the mean of 6 readings during 3 visits. Ambulatory heart rate was recorded with a portable intermittent technique in 807 subjects. RESULTS: Raised baseline clinic heart rate was positively associated with a worse prognosis for total, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality among the 2293 men and women taking placebo. Subjects with heart rates higher than 79 beats/min (bpm) (top quintile) had a 1.89 times greater risk of mortality than subjects with heart rate lower than or equal to 79 bpm (95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.68 bpm). In a Cox regression analysis, predictors of time to death were heart rate (P<.001), age (P<.001), serum creatinine level (P =.001), presence of diabetes (P =.002), previous cardiovascular disease (P =.01), triglyceride readings (P =.02), smoking (P =.04), and elevated systolic blood pressure (P =.05), while total cholesterol level was found to be nonsignificant in the model. In the ambulatory monitoring subgroup, clinic and ambulatory heart rates predicted noncardiovascular but not cardiovascular mortality. However, in a Cox regression analysis in which clinic and ambulatory heart rates were included, a significant association with noncardiovascular mortality was found only for clinic heart rate (P =.004). In the active treatment group, the weak predictive power of clinic heart rate for mortality disappeared after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, a clinic heart rate greater than 79 bpm was a significant predictor of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality. Ambulatory heart rate did not add prognostic information to that provided by clinic heart rate.

Prognostic significance of renal function in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: results from the Syst-Eur trial.

Several reports suggest that markers of renal function such as serum creatinine, serum uric acid, and urinary excretion of protein may be related to cardiovascular complications and mortality. This study analyzed the data from the Syst-Eur trial, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind intervention trial in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The purpose was to evaluate whether serum levels of creatinine and uric acid and urinary protein excretion at entry are related to subsequent morbidity and mortality. Incidence rates of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke (fatal as well as nonfatal), coronary events, and all cardiovascular endpoints were calculated for each quintile of serum creatinine or serum uric acid or for each category of protein excretion (none, trace, and overt). Crude and adjusted relative hazard rates were also determined for each 20 micro M increase in serum creatinine, each 50 micro M increase in serum uric acid, and for each protein excretion category. Even when adjusted for age, gender, and various other covariates, serum creatinine was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. There was an U-shaped relationship between serum uric acid and total mortality, but otherwise no obvious relationships were detected between serum uric acid levels and complications when appropriate adjustments were made for confounding variables. Proteinuria at entry was a significant predictor of total mortality and all cardiovascular endpoints. It is concluded that higher levels of serum creatinine and trace or overt proteinuria are associated with an increased number of cardiovascular events and with a higher mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension.