Enhanced recovery and same-day discharge after brain tumor surgery under general anesthesia: initial experience with Hospital-at-Home-based postoperative follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of outpatient oncological neurosurgery (OON) in a European clinical setting and to compare them with the conventional inpatient protocol. METHODS: Patients who had undergone OON (either tumor removal or biopsy) at the authors' center since 2019 were analyzed. A matched cohort of patients was selected from patients undergoing tumor surgery in the same period. Collected data included patient demographics, postoperative progress, specific location of the target lesion, and the procedure performed. RESULTS: There were 18 patients in the case group and 59 patients in the control group. The outpatient surgeries had a same-day discharge rate of 89%, and all ambulatory patients successfully completed the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program within 6.24 hours of the procedure. All ambulatory patients underwent Hospital-at-Home postoperative follow-up for an average of 4.12 days. Radiological complications were present in 11% of the case group and 8% of the control group. Postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 6% of the same-day discharge group and 3% of the control group. Among the patients in the control group, 3% suffered from postoperative seizures, whereas no seizures were observed in the case group. These differences were not statistically significant. General anesthesia-related complications were not observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings demonstrate that Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols and same-day discharge craniotomy for tumor resection and image-guided biopsy under general anesthesia, when patients are carefully selected, can be safely performed with excellent outcomes in a European clinical setting. The OON program proved to be a viable alternative to conventional hospitalization, showing comparable safety records and offering advantages in terms of patient recovery.

Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of a telemedicine-based outpatient brain tumor surgery program.

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing evidence on the benefits of outpatient oncological neurosurgery (OON), it is only performed in a few specialized centers and there are no previous descriptions of established OON programs in Europe. Moreover, increasing application of telemedicine strategies, especially after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is drastically changing neurosurgical management, particularly in the case of vulnerable populations such as neuro-oncological patients. In this context, the authors implemented an OON program in their hospital with telematic follow-up. Herein, they describe the protocol and qualitatively analyze the barriers and facilitators of the development process. METHODS: An OON program was developed through the following steps: assessment of hospital needs, specific OON training, multidisciplinary team organization, and OON protocol design. In addition, the implementation phase included training sessions, a pilot study, and continuous improvement sessions. Finally, barriers and facilitators of the protocol's implementation were identified from the feedback of all participants. RESULTS: An OON protocol was successfully designed and implemented for resection or biopsy of supratentorial lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. The protocol included the patient's admission to the day surgery unit, noninvasive anesthetic monitoring, same-day discharge, and admission to the hospital-at-home (HaH) unit for telematic and on-site postoperative care. After a pilot study including 10 procedures in 9 patients, the main barriers identified were healthcare provider resistance to change, lack of experience in outpatient neurosurgery, patient reluctance, and limitations in the recruitment of patients. Key facilitators of the process were the patient education program, the multidisciplinary team approach, and the HaH-based telematic postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating an OON program with telematic follow-up in a European clinical setting is feasible. Nevertheless, it poses several barriers that can be overcome by identifying and maximizing key facilitators of the process. Among them, patient education, a multidisciplinary team approach, and HaH-based postoperative care were crucial to the success of the program. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine to assess potential cost savings, from reduced travel and wait times, and the impact on patient satisfaction.