Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy fails in approximately 3.5% to 15% of patients. Evidence of successful laparoscopic reoperation is limited to a few studies. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy reoperation (LHM-R) from 2008 to 2016. The operative outcomes, preoperative and last follow-up manometric parameters, and symptom questionnaire results, including the Eckardt, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and eating assessment tool (EAT-10) scores, were obtained. The data were compared with those of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM-1). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients who underwent LHM-R and 35 patients who underwent LHM-1 were included. The reasons for failure in the LHM-R patient group included incomplete myotomy (71.4%), myotomy fibrosis (25.7%) and structural alterations in fundoplication (2.9%). The follow-up duration was 34 months for the LHM-R group and 24 months for the LHM-1 group (p = 0.557). The procedure was performed by laparoscopy in 100% of the patients in the two groups. No differences were found regarding surgical morbidity (11.4% LHM-R vs. 2.9% LHM-1, p = 0.164). The symptomatic outcomes were equivalent between groups (Eckardt p = 0.063, EAT-10 p = 0.166, GERD-HRQL p = 0.075). An IRP < 15 mmHg was achieved in 100% of the LHM-R and LHM-1 patients. At the last follow-up, 82.1% of the LHM-R patients and 91.4% of the LHM-1 patients were in symptomatic remission (p = 0.271). CONCLUSION: The results achieved with LHM-R are similar to those achieved with LHM-1. Laparoscopic reoperation should be considered an effective and safe treatment after a failed Heller myotomy.

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction: Characterization of a new entity? Clinical, manometric, and neuroimmunological description.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between clinical, manometric, and neuroimmunological profile of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and achalasia patients. METHODS: Seven EGJOO and 27 achalasia patients were enrolled in a blind cross-sectional study. Peripheral blood (PB) of 10 healthy donors and 10 lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle biopsies from organ transplant donors were included as controls. The presence of ganglion cells, cells of Cajal, Th22/Th7/Th2/Th1/Tregs/Bregs/pDCregs in tissue, and PB was assessed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Serum concentration of IL-22/IL-17A/IL-17F/IL-4/IFN-γ/IL-1ß/IL-6/IL-23/IL-33/TNF-α/IL-10 was determined using bioplex plates. ANAs and antineuronal antibodies were evaluated by immunofluorescence and Western blot. KEY RESULTS: EGJOO and achalasia patients had lower ganglion cells and cells of Cajal percentage vs. controls, while fibrosis was present only in achalasia patients. EGJOO and controls had lower cell percentage of Th22/Th17/Th2 vs. achalasia. EGJOO tissue had lower Th1/Treg cell number vs. achalasia, but higher levels vs. control group. Bregs and pDCregs percentage was higher in EGJOO vs. control group. Percentage of PB subpopulations in EGJOO was not significantly different from control group. Serum cytokine levels were higher for IL-1ß/IL-6/TNF-α, while IL-17A levels were lower in EGJOO vs. achalasia and control group. EGJOO group was negative for ANAs, while in achalasia group, 54% were positive. GAD65 and PNMa/Ta2 antibodies were present in achalasia, whereas Yo and recoverin were positive in EGJOO group. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Although EGJOO shares some clinical characteristics with achalasia, the neuroimmunological profile is completely different, suggesting that EGJOO might be a different entity.

Dor Vs Toupet Fundoplication After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluated by High-Resolution Manometry.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication is an effective treatment for achalasia. However, the type of fundoplication is still a subject of debate. AIM: The aim of the study is to identify which partial fundoplication leads to better control of acid exposure, manometric parameters, and symptoms scores. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare Dor vs Toupet fundoplication after LHM. The preoperative diagnosis was made by high-resolution manometry (HRM), upper endoscopy, and barium esophagogram. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms were evaluated with Eckardt, GERD-HRQL, and EAT-10 questionnaires. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were randomized, 38 underwent Dor and 35 Toupet. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Postoperative HRM showed that the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure were similar at 6 and 24 months. The number of patients with abnormal acid exposure was significantly lower for Dor (6.9%) than that of Toupet (34.0%) at 6 months, but it was not different at 12 or 24 months. No differences were found in postoperative symptom scores at 1, 6, or 24 months. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in symptom scores or HRM between fundoplications in the long term. A higher percentage of abnormal 24-h pH test were found for the Toupet group, with no difference in the long term.