Early interventions with parental participation and their implications on the neurodevelopment of premature children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The occurrence of preterm birth is correlated with the potential emergence of disabilities in children. Early intervention programs are designed to promote better developmental outcomes. These interventions employ family-centered methodologies, wherein parents are instructed to facilitate neurodevelopment, thereby promoting heightened involvement of the child in their daily activities. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of early family-based interventions on motor, cognitive, and language development. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the databases PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, SciELO, and Open Grey. The search terms utilized included NDT (neuro-developmental treatment), Bobath, neurodevelopmental therapy, parents administered, family administered, physical therapy modalities, early intervention (educational), early intervention, premature infant, preterm, and premature. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies written in English or Spanish were taken into consideration. The initial search resulted in 420 articles. After removing duplicates and applying the selection criteria, 12 articles were selected for the systematic review and 5 articles were selected for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between early intervention and enhanced cognitive function (p = 0.01) in this study. Additionally, the meta-analysis indicated improvements resulting from early family-based intervention (p = 0.02) in motor function. Early motor interventions that emphasize parent involvement and education in neurodevelopment show significant outcomes in motor and cognitive areas at 2 years of age in very premature or extremely premature infants. However, inconclusive effects have been found in the language area, which is the least studied domain. Due to the methodological heterogeneity observed, further research is needed to establish conclusive decisions regarding the administration of these interventions and the determination of key evaluation periods.

Lower plasma melatonin levels in non-hypoxic premature newborns associated with neonatal pain.

We analyzed plasma melatonin levels in different groups of preterm newborns without hypoxia and their relationship with several perinatal variables like gestational age or neonatal pain. Prospective cohort study of preterm newborns (PTNB) without perinatal hypoxia, Apgar > 6 at 5 min, and oxygen needs on the third day of life. We compared melatonin levels at day 3 of life in different groups of non-hypoxic preterm infants (Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, and chi2) and analyzed the relationship of melatonin with GA, birth weight, neonatal pain (Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scale), caffeine treatment, parenteral nutrition, or the development of free radical diseases (correlation study, linear regression) and factors associated with moderate/intense pain and free radical diseases (logistic regression analysis). Sixty-one preterm infants with gestational age (GA) of 30.7 ± 2.0 weeks with no oxygen requirements at day 3 of life were studied with plasma melatonin levels of 33.8 ± 12.01 pg/ml. Preterm infants weighing < 1250 g at birth had lower plasma melatonin levels (p = 0.05). Preterm infants with moderate or severe pain (PPIPP > 5) have lower melatonin levels (p = 0.01), and being preterm with PIPP > 5 is associated with lower plasma melatonin levels (p = 0.03). Being very preterm (GA < 32 GS), having low weight for gestational age (LWGA), receiving caffeine treatment, or requiring parenteral nutrition did not modify melatonin levels in non-hypoxic preterm infants (p = NS). Melatonin on day 3 of life in non-hypoxic preterm infants is not associated with later development of free radical diseases (BPD, sepsis, ROP, HIV, NEC). CONCLUSION: We observed that preterm infants with moderate to severe pain have lower melatonin levels. These findings are relevant because they reinforce the findings of other authors that melatonin supplementation decreases pain and oxidative stress in painful procedures in premature infants. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether melatonin could be used as an analgesic in painful procedures in preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration was not required since this was an observational study. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Melatonin is a potent antioxidant and free radical scavenger in newborns under stress conditions: hypoxia, acidosis, hypotension, painful procedures, or parenteral nutrition. • Pain stimulates the production of melatonin. • Various studies conclude that melatonin administration decreases pain during the neonatal period. WHAT IS NEW: • Non-hypoxic preterm infants with moderate to severe pain (PIPP>5) have lower levels of melatonin. • Administration of caffeine and treatment with parenteral nutrition do not modify melatonin levels in non-hypoxic preterm infants.

A study of drug-resistant childhood epilepsy testing the new ILAE criteria.

PURPOSE: To test the new ILAE definition of drug-resistant epilepsy in a cohort study. METHODS: All children younger than 14 with two or more unprovoked seizures observed at our hospital between 1994 and 2008 were included. RESULTS: Five hundred and eight patients were followed for an average of 90 months (range 24-168). The probabilities of achieving seizure freedom, according to the ILAE criteria, with the first, second, third and fourth and subsequent therapeutic regimens were 65%, 29%, 27% and 21%, respectively. In the cohort, 87 patients met the criteria for drug-resistant epilepsy, which represents 19% of the treated patients (n=459) and 17% of the overall sample. The probability of meeting the criteria for drug-resistant epilepsy was 11%, 11% and 13% at 2, 6 and 10 years respectively. Sixty two percent of drug resistant cases were younger than 4 years old, 73% had an associated developmental delay and/or motor deficit, 42% had an identifiable structural cause of epilepsy and 32% had a specific epileptic syndrome. For drug-resistant patients who tried additional therapeutic regimens, the probability of achieving a seizure-free state without further recurrences was 23% and 27% at three and five years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with more stringent criteria, the new ILAE criteria classify a greater number of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. A significantly higher proportion of cases meeting this definition subsequently enter remission. A definition of drug-resistance that includes the additional criteria of failure of a third antiepileptic drug or high seizure frequency may better identify patients with truly drug-resistant epilepsy.